19.08.2022 Views

A History of Central Eastern Europe

Four towns in Zemplen Megye in Hungary are studied: Hosszu-Laz, Felso-Regmec, Nagy-Trna (now in Slovakia), and Satoralijaujhely; and two villages in the Spis region of Slovakia: Stara Ves and Majere with Lysa nad Dunajcom provide the backdrop for an overview of this part of Hungary and Upper Hungary from the 18th to 20th centuries.

Four towns in Zemplen Megye in Hungary are studied: Hosszu-Laz, Felso-Regmec, Nagy-Trna (now in Slovakia), and Satoralijaujhely; and two villages in the Spis region of Slovakia: Stara Ves and Majere with Lysa nad Dunajcom provide the backdrop for an overview of this part of Hungary and Upper Hungary from the 18th to 20th centuries.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SLOVAK SOCIETY

Slovakia has historically been an agricultural country with 3 distinct groups of “farmers” –

Farmers: worked a farm, a “full farm” being ~ 90 ac which was passed on to the eldest son or grandson.

The yearly costs in SZEPES paid to the CSÁKY family before 1848 were:

o The robota (hrs of labor) those w/ horses worked 52 days a year; without worked 104; or 1 day and 2

days a week respectively. The remaining days were spent tending to their separate fields;

o One large wagon-load of firewood, cut and brought to castle;

o 2 chickens, 2 roosters, dozen eggs, and ½ crock of rendered pig fat;

o 1 Hungarian forint

Tenants: were similar to the farmers but on a smaller scale; they had their house, but no work animals.

Their robota was 18 days a year or one and a half days per month.

Subtenants: held no land in their own right but lived with farmers or tenants. Their robota amounted to

just one day per month or a total of 12 per year.

In any year the taxes due the noble, i.e. not manual work, were subject to being doubled if the land-owner

married (nice way to guarantee an easy 1 st year). After 1848 title to the land and buildings that “farmers” had leased

was transferred from the noble to the farmer. A variety of taxes were also payable directly to the king and city:

‣ Gemeindesteuer (city tax)

‣ Mautpflicht

‣ Korbgeld

‣ Portengeld

‣ Salzfuhr (Salt was a state monopoly and each household had to buy a set amount at a set price)

As populations rose the demand for goods needed to run a farm rose: clothing, shoes & food. So did the demand for

saloons, taverns & churches. A village was run by a mayor who had been elected by the farmers.

The larger businesses, such as breweries, distilleries, mills and factories were owned by the landlord whose

economic success was intricately linked to the prosperity of their farmers and tenants. Running a saloon or a mill

was often leased out to individuals by the owner.

It was important to the State to keep the farmers in possession of their lands, the source of income through land

taxes. Nobles/landlords were exempt from land taxes. As landlords repossessed farms, the King’s income dropped

but the landlord had to have more hands to work his dominical farms. The robota was increased to 3 & 6 days/wk

(with & without animals) in some parts of the Kingdom! As dominical lands increased, farmer land decreased and

there were fewer hands to satisfy the needs of the noble’s dominical lands. With fewer farmers & farms

(urbarial/cultivated and extirpaturial/cleared land) there was less tax revenue. This was made up for by raising taxes.

This constant tug-of-war between the noble class and the monarchy created a population steadily growing less

prosperous due to increase land taxes and increased robota which led to “peasant uprisings.”

The local Roman Catholic Bishop had a right, as the state religion, established by law to 1 / 10 of all crops

cultivated – the equivalent of a 10% tithe – called the “tenth.” Only Roman Catholic clergy were enriched in this

manner and all citizens had to pay no matter what religion you adhered to. This ended in 1781 as part of JOSEPH II to

loosen the grip the Church had on the finances of the HABSBURG holdings. Landlords had a right to a further 1 / 10 of

all remaining crops, or 1 / 9 of the total crops (10% of 90%) of their subjects which was called the “ninth.” A Bishop

who was also a landlord became wealthy very quick – taking almost 1 / 5 of everyone’s harvest!

A ruled over a territory was a GRAFSCHAFT and, depending on gender, was ruled by:

LANGUAGE MASCULINE FEMININE TERRITORY

GERMAN GRAF GRÄFIN GRAFSCHAFT

SLOVAK GRÓF GRÓFKA GRÓFSTVO

HUNGARIAN GRÓF GRÓFNŐ & GRÓFNÉ GRÓFSÁG

50b

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!