19.08.2022 Views

A History of Central Eastern Europe

Four towns in Zemplen Megye in Hungary are studied: Hosszu-Laz, Felso-Regmec, Nagy-Trna (now in Slovakia), and Satoralijaujhely; and two villages in the Spis region of Slovakia: Stara Ves and Majere with Lysa nad Dunajcom provide the backdrop for an overview of this part of Hungary and Upper Hungary from the 18th to 20th centuries.

Four towns in Zemplen Megye in Hungary are studied: Hosszu-Laz, Felso-Regmec, Nagy-Trna (now in Slovakia), and Satoralijaujhely; and two villages in the Spis region of Slovakia: Stara Ves and Majere with Lysa nad Dunajcom provide the backdrop for an overview of this part of Hungary and Upper Hungary from the 18th to 20th centuries.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Central Eastern Europe

The borderlands of the Hungarian, Slovak and Polish countries as they stand

today are of particular concern in any attempt to discover, understand and illuminate the

places and people that lived in this seemingly vast and mysterious section of the world.

But the hazy cloud that obscures the spectacular history of this area is only one of

recent invention. For the better part of the last century the Soviet control of virtually all

lands between Russia and Germany and extending to cover the Balkan peninsula have

made it difficult, if not undesirable, to uncover or rediscover these domains with their

rich history. This was not always the case – during the nineteenth century, and for

centuries before that, Europe stood as a whole entity; the artificial division into a

“Western” and “Eastern” Europe was a construct of man, a construct whose goal was to

slice the continent in two and give the appearance of an advanced culture and society

with progressive ideas in Western Europe. Societies that the United States could

befriend, defend and partner with; the “other” Europe – the backwards, illiterate, dark

one stuck in medieval ways had to be conquered, educated or otherwise dragged from

the depths of Soviet thought by those more “enlightened.” Or, at least, that was the

approach, in the proverbial nutshell that governed Western actions for the last century.

Eastern, that is to say, Soviet beliefs and acts dovetailed quite nicely with the Western

approach – the isolationist tendencies of Soviet-controlled areas were required for their

doctrines to be successful. The pre-Soviet history of the nations had to be suppressed

or rewritten, Western culture had to be portrayed as flawed and decadent while Soviet

doctrine exalted as the pinnacle of mankind’s achievements, the logical conclusion of

centuries of progress during which many different forms of government had been tried –

absolute monarchies, republics, democracies, constitutional monarchies – and

discarded for the utopian Soviet society. The disinformation coming from both sides of

the artificial divide was desired and required by both.

With the fall of Soviet power and the corrupted version of Communism that came

to predominate in the last half of the twentieth century the artificial division has also

fallen. The Berlin Wall is perhaps the greatest metaphorical symbol of this artificial

divide: constructed at the height of the Cold War in 1961, it lasted less than 30 years

before being destroyed in 1989. Future generations will be much better educated in the

history of this area as it is no longer in our government’s interest to project this area and

these people as enemies of our state or as a threat to our liberty. But those of my

generation will not benefit from the History 102 high school classes required for

graduation in 2015, or 2006 for that matter. It is our responsibility to go out and actively

seek to know, to educate ourselves, if we are to know the history of the area. Is it

important for us to know this history? The answer to that question is as individual as we

are. Its import to me is to facilitate my understanding of how it was that I came to be. My

parent’s background is quite ordinary – they grew up in the same town, they graduated

from the same high school – but that of their parent’s is anything but ordinary. How is it

that just two generations ago four individuals from such diverse backgrounds – one the

son of immigrants from the Kingdom of Naples, another a Hungarian probably of

German descent, the third being perhaps the most “American” of all with roots on this

continent going back almost four hundred years yet added to by an immigrant escaping

the Irish potato famine of the 1840s, and finally a daughter of ostensibly Slovak ancestry

whose surname has yet to be claimed by any nationality – how is it that these four

people came together at the time and place they did? Keep reading to know the answer.

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!