25.12.2012 Views

German Submarine Warfare 1914-1918 in the Eyes - British Naval ...

German Submarine Warfare 1914-1918 in the Eyes - British Naval ...

German Submarine Warfare 1914-1918 in the Eyes - British Naval ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

Table 20: <strong>German</strong> warships laid 1915-<strong>1918</strong> <strong>in</strong> 1,000 BRT 88<br />

52<br />

34<br />

71<br />

173<br />

B C D U<br />

87<br />

60<br />

37<br />

38<br />

1915 1916 1917 <strong>1918</strong><br />

Until <strong>the</strong> summer of 1917 <strong>the</strong>re were on average always seven to eight new<br />

dreadnoughts under construction <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> yards, along with a dozen light cruisers and<br />

some 60-80 destroyers, compared with roughly 100 submar<strong>in</strong>es. For <strong>the</strong> wartime<br />

orders of heavy surface ships <strong>in</strong> 1915 and 1916 (eight dreadnoughts plus fifteen<br />

light cruisers) 200 additional submar<strong>in</strong>es could have been funded. The Navy could<br />

have easily doubled submar<strong>in</strong>e construction <strong>in</strong> 1915-1916.<br />

<strong>German</strong> <strong>Submar<strong>in</strong>e</strong> Orders <strong>1914</strong>-<strong>1918</strong><br />

The submar<strong>in</strong>e arm (Uboots-Inspektorat, UI) of <strong>the</strong> High Seas Fleet had<br />

calculated <strong>in</strong> May, <strong>1914</strong> <strong>the</strong> need for a total of 222 U-boats for a merchant<br />

blockade of <strong>the</strong> <strong>British</strong> Isles. Tirpitz simply ignored what he may have thought<br />

were fantastic numbers, but <strong>the</strong> first successes of submar<strong>in</strong>es aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>British</strong><br />

Warships <strong>in</strong> <strong>1914</strong> and 1915 put him under pressure to reconsider <strong>the</strong> situation: 89 In<br />

April, 1915 <strong>the</strong> Kaiser received a memorandum from his naval staff request<strong>in</strong>g an<br />

order of 200 additional submar<strong>in</strong>es. In January, 1916 Navy leadership called for<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r 350 submar<strong>in</strong>es to mount a comprehensive blockade of Brita<strong>in</strong> stretch<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from <strong>the</strong> Atlantic, <strong>the</strong> North Sea and <strong>the</strong> English Channel, as well as re-enforce<br />

Mediterranean operations.<br />

In all, <strong>the</strong> hulls ordered amounted to a total of 170 available submar<strong>in</strong>es a year<br />

by January 1917. 90<br />

Arguments <strong>in</strong> opposition were not slow <strong>in</strong> com<strong>in</strong>g. In November, 1916<br />

Admiral von Capelle compla<strong>in</strong>ed about excessive order<strong>in</strong>g of submar<strong>in</strong>es. He<br />

believed that <strong>the</strong> war would end soon and an excess of submar<strong>in</strong>es would have a<br />

negative impact on <strong>the</strong> post-war naval budget for dreadnought construction. 91 The<br />

88 Numbers based on: Groener, Deutsche Kriegsschiffe.<br />

89 Weir, Kaiser's Navy, p. 172.<br />

90 Rössler, Ubootbau, pp. 96-99.<br />

91 Ibid. p. 107.<br />

xl<br />

92<br />

84<br />

86<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!