German Submarine Warfare 1914-1918 in the Eyes - British Naval ...
German Submarine Warfare 1914-1918 in the Eyes - British Naval ...
German Submarine Warfare 1914-1918 in the Eyes - British Naval ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The UB III was a syn<strong>the</strong>sis of UC II and UB II, de-facto a ‘Mittel-U light’.<br />
They were built <strong>in</strong> high numbers, were quite successful and appreciated by <strong>the</strong><br />
submar<strong>in</strong>e commanders. Their high losses resulted from <strong>the</strong>ir operations <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
second half of <strong>the</strong> war, when anti-submar<strong>in</strong>e defences had <strong>in</strong>creased.<br />
The long range U-cruisers came late <strong>in</strong> 1917 and <strong>in</strong> small numbers. The <strong>British</strong><br />
had expected <strong>the</strong>m already for 1916 and judged about <strong>the</strong>ir strategic long range<br />
potential:<br />
“[...<strong>the</strong>y] might possibly have entailed a complete revision of many of <strong>the</strong> means of defence<br />
which were prov<strong>in</strong>g effective aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> smaller submar<strong>in</strong>es [...]” 85<br />
<strong>German</strong> naval construction <strong>1914</strong>-<strong>1918</strong><br />
Dreadnought priority until 1916<br />
Imperial Navy fleet construction authorization (Flottengesetz) for 1912<br />
approved three new dreadnought keels to be laid down <strong>in</strong> 1915. Six submar<strong>in</strong>es<br />
were scheduled annually but Tirpitz favoured dreadnought construction. With war,<br />
<strong>the</strong> focus shifted slightly with a dozen each of ocean-go<strong>in</strong>g and coastal submar<strong>in</strong>es<br />
added to <strong>the</strong> construction list.<br />
The three dreadnoughts previewed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> budget were laid down <strong>in</strong> 1915. Five<br />
additional super-dreadnoughts were ordered as replacements for sunken old<br />
cruisers and three of <strong>the</strong>se were laid down between November 1915 and July 1916.<br />
Table 19: <strong>German</strong> dreadnoughts laid down 1915-1916 86<br />
Ship Type BRT<br />
Costs (Mio.<br />
RM)<br />
Pr<strong>in</strong>z Eitel Friedrich battle-cruiser 35,300 66<br />
Mackensen battle-cruiser 35,300 66<br />
Württemberg battleship 32,200 50<br />
Yorck battle-cruiser 38,000 75<br />
Blücher battle-cruiser 35,000 66<br />
Friedr. Carl battle-cruiser 35,000 66<br />
Ocean-go<strong>in</strong>g submar<strong>in</strong>es of <strong>the</strong> U-19 type displaced 650 BRT and cost 3.3<br />
million Reichsmarks. Battleship construction required at least three years; a<br />
submar<strong>in</strong>e 12-18 months. A s<strong>in</strong>gle dreadnought cost <strong>the</strong> equivalent of twenty<br />
ocean-go<strong>in</strong>g U-boats. 87<br />
85 HW 7/2, analysis of Room 40, here pr<strong>in</strong>ted on page 240.<br />
86 Numbers based on: Groener, Deutsche Kriegsschiffe; and on: Forstmeier, Grosskampfschiffe.<br />
87 Lambert, Fisher’s Revolution, cites examples of <strong>the</strong> same k<strong>in</strong>d of calculations for <strong>the</strong> <strong>British</strong> side.<br />
xxxix