25.12.2012 Views

German Submarine Warfare 1914-1918 in the Eyes - British Naval ...

German Submarine Warfare 1914-1918 in the Eyes - British Naval ...

German Submarine Warfare 1914-1918 in the Eyes - British Naval ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Meanwhile, <strong>the</strong> number of patrol and convoy guard vessels <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

exponentially. Dreadnought construction ceased <strong>in</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> favour of smaller,<br />

more manoeuvrable vessels. Pre-dreadnought battleships were de-commissioned;<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir crews transferred to new warships.<br />

The last year of <strong>the</strong> unrestricted submar<strong>in</strong>e war<br />

From October, 1917 submar<strong>in</strong>e numbers and availability <strong>in</strong> <strong>German</strong>y<br />

decreased. New construction did not replace losses. Relative s<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>gs per boat<br />

decreased. Still, what U-boats could be brought <strong>in</strong>to service prosecuted <strong>the</strong> war<br />

until near <strong>the</strong> end of hostilities. Their élan and determ<strong>in</strong>ation can not be doubted.<br />

<strong>Submar<strong>in</strong>e</strong> S<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>gs – Claims and Reality<br />

Table 16: Mio BRT World Tonnage sunk <strong>1914</strong>-<strong>1918</strong> by different sources<br />

Published By <strong>Submar<strong>in</strong>e</strong>s By M<strong>in</strong>es Total<br />

<strong>German</strong> Admiralty 75 <strong>1914</strong>-<strong>1918</strong> 15.0 3.7 18.7*<br />

<strong>British</strong> Admiralty 76 1919 11.1 1.1 12.2<br />

Sp<strong>in</strong>dler 77 1966 11.0 1.2 12.2<br />

* 9,506 BRT miss<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> sum, see footnote for Michelsen<br />

Each month <strong>the</strong> naval staff <strong>in</strong> Berl<strong>in</strong> published a record of U-boat successes<br />

by tonnage. These numbers were 50% higher than <strong>British</strong> figures for <strong>the</strong> same<br />

period. Chalk<strong>in</strong>g up successes and failures <strong>in</strong> wartime should always be read with<br />

tongue firmly planted <strong>in</strong> cheek. Each side has to balance political considerations as<br />

well as public reaction. However, <strong>in</strong> <strong>German</strong>y <strong>the</strong> Imperial Navy senior staff’s<br />

fanciful concoctions stretched credibility beyond <strong>the</strong> break<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

Later <strong>in</strong> 1917, <strong>the</strong> Imperial Navy’s <strong>in</strong>flated numbers climbed to 153% of<br />

actual tonnage destroyed, and <strong>in</strong> <strong>1918</strong> to an astound<strong>in</strong>g 193% of <strong>the</strong> truth. The<br />

army and government used <strong>the</strong> fictional count as a basis for <strong>the</strong>ir political,<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustrial and strategic calculations. Inside <strong>the</strong> Navy <strong>the</strong> real numbers were known<br />

as <strong>the</strong> “captured <strong>German</strong> s<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g lists” (see Chapter V) and were circulated among<br />

U-boat-commanders and <strong>the</strong> High Seas Fleet. These numbers correspond quite<br />

exactly with <strong>the</strong> numbers of <strong>the</strong> <strong>British</strong> Admiralty.<br />

75 Follow<strong>in</strong>g Michelsen, U-Bootskrieg, pp. 196-197. Michelsen published <strong>the</strong> ‘official numbers’,<br />

announced by <strong>the</strong> <strong>German</strong> Admiralty Staff <strong>1914</strong>-<strong>1918</strong>. There is a addition eror <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sum for<br />

submar<strong>in</strong>es and m<strong>in</strong>es of 9,506 BRT <strong>in</strong> Michelsen.<br />

Galster, 1925, p. 145, also uses <strong>the</strong> ‘official numbers’ of <strong>the</strong> Admiralty Staff: For Feb. 1917 – Dec<br />

1917 he claims 8,916,500 BRT sunk, for Jan. to Sep. <strong>1918</strong> 5,198,000.<br />

Sp<strong>in</strong>dler, Vol. V, p. 345, gives <strong>the</strong> ‘official numbers <strong>1914</strong>-<strong>1918</strong>’ as 17,223,096 BRT.<br />

76 NA/ADM 137/3921. The same numbers for <strong>the</strong> <strong>British</strong> Admiralty also <strong>in</strong>: Salter, Allied Shipp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Control, pp. 355-359.<br />

77 Sp<strong>in</strong>dler, Handelskrieg, Vol V, pp. 368-371. Also a 50,000 BRT mistake <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> summation.<br />

xxxvi

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!