25.12.2012 Views

German Submarine Warfare 1914-1918 in the Eyes - British Naval ...

German Submarine Warfare 1914-1918 in the Eyes - British Naval ...

German Submarine Warfare 1914-1918 in the Eyes - British Naval ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1 200<br />

1 000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

96<br />

Table 1: The <strong>German</strong> Navy 1900-<strong>1914</strong> <strong>in</strong> 1,000 BRT 13<br />

B (battleship) C (cruiser) D (destroyer) U (submar<strong>in</strong>e)<br />

138 164<br />

218<br />

1900 1902 1904 1906 1908 1910 1912 <strong>1914</strong><br />

Numbers of ships by column: B-battleships; C-cruiser; D-destroyer, torpedo<br />

boats, m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g vessels; U-<strong>German</strong> submar<strong>in</strong>es. The total size of <strong>the</strong> Navy is given <strong>in</strong><br />

Brutto Register Tonnage (BRT).<br />

With characteristic <strong>the</strong>atricality and no small amount of dis<strong>in</strong>genuousness<br />

Churchill announced before <strong>the</strong> war<br />

“All sorts of sober m<strong>in</strong>ded people <strong>in</strong> England began to be profoundly disquieted. What did<br />

<strong>German</strong>y want this navy for? Aga<strong>in</strong>st whom, except us, could she measure it, match it, or<br />

use it?” 14<br />

“It is noth<strong>in</strong>g. It is less than noth<strong>in</strong>g. It is too foolish, too fantastic to be thought of <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

twentieth century. Or is it fire and murder leap<strong>in</strong>g out of <strong>the</strong> darkness at our throats,<br />

torpedoes ripp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> bellies of half-awakened ships, a sunrise on a vanished naval<br />

supremacy, and an island well guarded hi<strong>the</strong>rto, at last defenceless? No, it is noth<strong>in</strong>g. […]<br />

It would be a pity to be wrong. Such a mistake could only be made once – once for all.” 15<br />

“The <strong>British</strong> Navy is to us a necessity and, from some po<strong>in</strong>ts of view, <strong>the</strong> <strong>German</strong> Navy is<br />

to <strong>the</strong>m more <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> nature of a luxury. Our naval power <strong>in</strong>volves <strong>British</strong> existence. It is<br />

existence to us; it is expansion to <strong>the</strong>m …” 16<br />

<strong>Naval</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g at this time was driven by numbers: number and speed of<br />

ships, number of guns carried, <strong>the</strong>ir calibre and range, numbers of departments and<br />

personnel, and so forth. It was axiomatic <strong>in</strong> those years that a fleet one third<br />

stronger than its opponent would annihilate an enemy. Brita<strong>in</strong> only needed to build<br />

more ships than <strong>German</strong>y and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a forty percent advantage. “Two keels for<br />

13 Numbers based on: Groener, Deutsche Kriegsschiffe.<br />

14 Churchill, World Crisis, p. 23.<br />

15 Churchill, World Crisis, p. 30.<br />

16 Churchill, World Crisis, p. 61.<br />

268<br />

2<br />

364<br />

6<br />

520<br />

12<br />

710<br />

xiii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!