19.07.2022 Views

Southern Seminary Magazine (Vol 90.1) The Light of Truth: Apologetics in the 21st Century

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

pillars and bridges<br />

criterions that are foundational<br />

to and which ground one’s overall<br />

worldview. Although some<br />

deny that <strong>the</strong>y have a worldview,<br />

this is not <strong>the</strong> case: everyone has<br />

a worldview whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y acknowledge<br />

it or not.<br />

Despite differences between<br />

worldviews, every view is grounded<br />

<strong>in</strong> some ultimate criterion(s)<br />

or presuppositions that directs<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir reason<strong>in</strong>g and allows <strong>the</strong>m<br />

to <strong>in</strong>terpret <strong>the</strong>ir experience <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> world, especially on ultimate<br />

matters. Given this fact, this is<br />

why what is most significant <strong>in</strong><br />

worldview analysis is compar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and contrast<strong>in</strong>g a worldview’s<br />

presuppositional commitments.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, it is important to<br />

note that it is not enough merely<br />

to assert one’s presuppositions;<br />

one must also argue for <strong>the</strong>m, at<br />

least if one wants to argue for <strong>the</strong><br />

truth <strong>of</strong> one’s view over aga<strong>in</strong>st o<strong>the</strong>r worldviews. For<br />

this reason, a presuppositional approach to apologetics<br />

does not merely assert <strong>the</strong> truth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gospel, it also argues<br />

for <strong>the</strong> objective truth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Christian worldview<br />

over aga<strong>in</strong>st non-Christian views.<br />

Additionally, to clarify what presuppositionalism is as<br />

an apologetic method, it is crucial to note that it is not<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> evidences <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> defense <strong>of</strong> Christianity.<br />

Unfortunately, <strong>the</strong> term may convey such a misunderstand<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

as if presuppositionalism is only concerned<br />

about argu<strong>in</strong>g for one’s ultimate criterions and not concerned<br />

about giv<strong>in</strong>g specific pro<strong>of</strong>s and evidences for<br />

<strong>the</strong> truth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gospel. On <strong>the</strong> contrary, presuppositionalism<br />

affirms <strong>the</strong> necessary role that evidences serve<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> defense <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gospel, especially given <strong>the</strong> nature<br />

<strong>of</strong> Christianity.<br />

Unlike o<strong>the</strong>r religious and philosophical views, <strong>the</strong><br />

truthfulness <strong>of</strong> Christianity depends on <strong>the</strong> claim that<br />

our triune God is not only <strong>the</strong> Creator <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world but<br />

also <strong>the</strong> God who acts <strong>in</strong> history as <strong>the</strong> sovereign and<br />

providential Lord.<br />

Creation and history are <strong>the</strong> stage and <strong>the</strong>ater on which<br />

God displays his glory, and ultimately <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>carnation,<br />

life, death, and resurrection <strong>of</strong> God <strong>the</strong> Son, our Lord Jesus<br />

Christ—<strong>the</strong> one who has assumed our human nature<br />

to accomplish our redemption. For this reason, Christianity<br />

stands or falls on <strong>the</strong> objective truth <strong>of</strong> particular<br />

events <strong>in</strong> history. Thus, for example, if <strong>the</strong> flood, exodus,<br />

“Creation and history are <strong>the</strong><br />

stage and <strong>the</strong>ater on which God<br />

displays his glory, and ultimately<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>carnation, life, death, and<br />

resurrection <strong>of</strong> God <strong>the</strong> Son, our<br />

Lord Jesus Christ—<strong>the</strong> one who<br />

has assumed our human nature to<br />

accomplish our redemption.”<br />

and Old Testament events did not occur as Scripture describes—or<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> our Lord Jesus, <strong>the</strong>re was no<br />

virg<strong>in</strong> conception, miraculous life, bodily resurrection,<br />

glorious ascension, and Pentecost—Christianity crumbles.<br />

If <strong>the</strong>se events did not occur <strong>in</strong> history, <strong>the</strong> truth <strong>of</strong><br />

Scripture and <strong>the</strong> claims <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gospel are false.<br />

However, presuppositionalism rightly rem<strong>in</strong>ds us that<br />

evidences never stand alone apart from be<strong>in</strong>g presented<br />

<strong>in</strong> an overall <strong>the</strong>ology. Why? Because <strong>the</strong>re are no such<br />

th<strong>in</strong>gs as “brute facts,” namely un-<strong>in</strong>terpreted or self-<strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g<br />

“facts.” Instead, “facts” are part <strong>of</strong> an overall<br />

context—an <strong>in</strong>terpretive system or worldview—by which<br />

<strong>the</strong>y are understood. This is why <strong>in</strong> our presentation <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> “facts” for Christianity, facts must be presented with<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> entire worldview <strong>the</strong>y are embedded, o<strong>the</strong>rwise<br />

<strong>the</strong>y signify noth<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

For example, th<strong>in</strong>k <strong>of</strong> Christ’s bodily resurrection.<br />

Apart from <strong>the</strong> worldview <strong>of</strong> Scripture, <strong>the</strong> resurrection<br />

would not signify what it actually does <strong>in</strong> Scripture. After<br />

all, Jesus’ resurrection is more than a mere historical<br />

event: it is evidence that Jesus alone is <strong>the</strong> Savior, Lord,<br />

Judge, <strong>the</strong> one who has ratified a new covenant, and <strong>in</strong>augurated<br />

a new creation (Acts 2:32-36; 4:12; 13:32-38;<br />

17:30-31; 1 Cor. 15:1-3; Heb. 9:15-28). Apart from a<br />

specific view <strong>of</strong> God, history as <strong>the</strong> unfold<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> God’s<br />

eternal plan, and a specific conception <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Redeemer,<br />

Christ’s bodily resurrection <strong>in</strong> history would signify<br />

none <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se truths.<br />

20 <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn baptist <strong>the</strong>ological sem<strong>in</strong>ary

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!