Indian_Real_Estate_Law (2)

17.07.2022 Views

Indian Real Estate Laws 178tions to send them immediately to C, at Cuttack.B may sell the provisions at Calcutta,if they will not bear the journey to Cuttackwithout spoiling. (b) A consigns provisions toB at Calcutta, with directions to send themimmediately to C, at Cuttack. B may sell theprovisions at Calcutta, if they will not bearthe journey to Cuttack without spoiling." 189.Agent’s authority in an emergency.—An agenthas authority, in an emergency, to do all suchacts for the purpose of protecting his principalfrom loss as would be done by a person ofordinary prudence, in his own case under similarcircumstances. —An agent has authority,in an emergency, to do all such acts forthe purpose of protecting his principal fromloss as would be done by a person of ordinaryprudence, in his own case under similarcircumstances." Illustrations (a) An agent forsale may have goods repaired if it be necessary.(a) An agent for sale may have goods repairedif it be necessary." (b) A consigns provisionsto B at Calcutta, with directions to sendthem immediately to C, at Cuttack. B maysell the provisions at Calcutta, if they will notbear the journey to Cuttack without spoiling.(b) A consigns provisions to B at Calcutta,with directions to send them immediately toC, at Cuttack. B may sell the provisions atCalcutta, if they will not bear the journey toCuttack without spoiling." 190. When agentcannot delegate.—An agent cannot lawfullyemploy another to perform acts which he hasexpressly or impliedly undertaken to performpersonally, unless by the ordinary custom oftrade a sub-agent may, or, from the nature ofthe agency, a sub-agent must, be employed.—An agent cannot lawfully employ anotherto perform acts which he has expressly or impliedlyundertaken to perform personally, unlessby the ordinary custom of trade a subagentmay, or, from the nature of the agency,a sub-agent must, be employed." 191. ‘Subagent’defined.—A ‘sub-agent’ is a person employedby, and acting under the control of, theoriginal agent in the business of the agency.—A ‘sub-agent’ is a person employed by, andacting under the control of, the original agentin the business of the agency." 192. Representationof principal by sub-agent properlyappointed—Where a sub-agent is properly appointed,the principal is, so far as regards thirdpersons, represented by the sub-agent, and isbound by and responsible for his acts, as ifhe were an agent originally appointed by theprincipal. —Where a sub-agent is properlyappointed, the principal is, so far as regardsthird persons, represented by the sub-agent,and is bound by and responsible for his acts,as if he were an agent originally appointed bythe principal." Agent’s responsibility for subagent.—Theagent is responsible to the principalfor the acts of the sub-agent. —Theagent is responsible to the principal for theacts of the sub-agent." Sub-agent’s responsibility.—Thesub-agent is responsible for his actsto the agent, but not to the principal, exceptin cases of fraud or wilful wrong. —The subagentis responsible for his acts to the agent,but not to the principal, except in cases offraud or wilful wrong." 193. Agent’s responsibilityfor sub-agent appointed without authority.—Wherean agent, without having authorityto do so, has appointed a person toact as a sub-agent, the agent stands towardssuch person in the relation of a principal to anagent, and is responsible for his acts both tothe principal and to third persons; the principalis not represented by or responsible forthe acts of the person so employed, nor is thatperson responsible to the principal. —Wherean agent, without having authority to do so,has appointed a person to act as a sub-agent,the agent stands towards such person in therelation of a principal to an agent, and is responsiblefor his acts both to the principal andto third persons; the principal is not representedby or responsible for the acts of theperson so employed, nor is that person responsibleto the principal." 193. Agent’s responsibilityfor sub-agent appointed withoutauthority.—Where an agent, without havingauthority to do so, has appointed a personto act as a sub-agent, the agent stands towardssuch person in the relation of a principalto an agent, and is responsible for hisacts both to the principal and to third persons;the principal is not represented by or responsiblefor the acts of the person so employed,nor is that person responsible to the principal.6.6 6. THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872

179 Indian Real Estate Laws—Where an agent, without having authorityto do so, has appointed a person to act as asub-agent, the agent stands towards such personin the relation of a principal to an agent,and is responsible for his acts both to the principaland to third persons; the principal is notrepresented by or responsible for the acts ofthe person so employed, nor is that person responsibleto the principal." 194. Relation betweenprincipal and person duly appointed byagent to act in business of agency.—Where anagent, holding an express or implied authorityto name another person to act for the principalin the business of the agency, has namedanother person accordingly, such person is nota sub-agent, but an agent of the principal forsuch part of the business of the agency as is entrustedto him. —Where an agent, holding anexpress or implied authority to name anotherperson to act for the principal in the businessof the agency, has named another person accordingly,such person is not a sub-agent, butan agent of the principal for such part of thebusiness of the agency as is entrusted to him."Illustrations (a) A directs B, his solicitor, tosell his estate by auction, and to employ anauctioneer for the purpose. B names C, anauctioneer, to conduct the sale. C is not a subagent,but is A’s agent for the conduct of thesale. (b) A authorizes B, a merchant in Calcutta,to recover the moneys due to A from C& Co. B instructs D, a solicitor, to take legalproceedings against C & Co. for the recoveryof the money. D is not a sub-agent, butis solicitor for A. 195. Agent’s duty in namingsuch person.—In selecting such agent forhis principal, an agent is bound to exercise thesame amount of discretion as a man of ordinaryprudence would exercise in his own case;and, if he does this, he is not responsible tothe principal for the acts or negligence of theagent so selected. —In selecting such agentfor his principal, an agent is bound to exercisethe same amount of discretion as a manof ordinary prudence would exercise in his owncase; and, if he does this, he is not responsibleto the principal for the acts or negligence ofthe agent so selected." Illustrations (a) A instructsB, a merchant, to buy a ship for him.B employs a ship-surveyor of good reputationto choose a ship for A. The surveyor makesthe choice negligently and the ship turns outto be unseaworthy and is lost. B is not, butthe surveyor is, responsible to A. (a) A instructsB, a merchant, to buy a ship for him.B employs a ship-surveyor of good reputationto choose a ship for A. The surveyor makesthe choice negligently and the ship turns outto be unseaworthy and is lost. B is not, but thesurveyor is, responsible to A." (b) A consignsgoods to B, a merchant, for sale. B, in duecourse, employs an auctioneer in good creditto sell the goods of A, and allows the auctioneerto receive the proceeds of the sale. Theauctioneer afterwards becomes insolvent withouthaving accounted for the proceeds. B isnot responsible to A for the proceeds. (b) Aconsigns goods to B, a merchant, for sale. B,in due course, employs an auctioneer in goodcredit to sell the goods of A, and allows theauctioneer to receive the proceeds of the sale.The auctioneer afterwards becomes insolventwithout having accounted for the proceeds. Bis not responsible to A for the proceeds." 195.Agent’s duty in naming such person.—In selectingsuch agent for his principal, an agentis bound to exercise the same amount of discretionas a man of ordinary prudence wouldexercise in his own case; and, if he does this, heis not responsible to the principal for the actsor negligence of the agent so selected. —In selectingsuch agent for his principal, an agentis bound to exercise the same amount of discretionas a man of ordinary prudence wouldexercise in his own case; and, if he does this,he is not responsible to the principal for theacts or negligence of the agent so selected." Illustrations(a) A instructs B, a merchant, tobuy a ship for him. B employs a ship-surveyorof good reputation to choose a ship for A. Thesurveyor makes the choice negligently and theship turns out to be unseaworthy and is lost.B is not, but the surveyor is, responsible toA. (a) A instructs B, a merchant, to buy aship for him. B employs a ship-surveyor ofgood reputation to choose a ship for A. Thesurveyor makes the choice negligently and theship turns out to be unseaworthy and is lost.B is not, but the surveyor is, responsible toA." (b) A consigns goods to B, a merchant,6. THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 6.6

179 Indian Real Estate Laws

—Where an agent, without having authority

to do so, has appointed a person to act as a

sub-agent, the agent stands towards such person

in the relation of a principal to an agent,

and is responsible for his acts both to the principal

and to third persons; the principal is not

represented by or responsible for the acts of

the person so employed, nor is that person responsible

to the principal." 194. Relation between

principal and person duly appointed by

agent to act in business of agency.—Where an

agent, holding an express or implied authority

to name another person to act for the principal

in the business of the agency, has named

another person accordingly, such person is not

a sub-agent, but an agent of the principal for

such part of the business of the agency as is entrusted

to him. —Where an agent, holding an

express or implied authority to name another

person to act for the principal in the business

of the agency, has named another person accordingly,

such person is not a sub-agent, but

an agent of the principal for such part of the

business of the agency as is entrusted to him."

Illustrations (a) A directs B, his solicitor, to

sell his estate by auction, and to employ an

auctioneer for the purpose. B names C, an

auctioneer, to conduct the sale. C is not a subagent,

but is A’s agent for the conduct of the

sale. (b) A authorizes B, a merchant in Calcutta,

to recover the moneys due to A from C

& Co. B instructs D, a solicitor, to take legal

proceedings against C & Co. for the recovery

of the money. D is not a sub-agent, but

is solicitor for A. 195. Agent’s duty in naming

such person.—In selecting such agent for

his principal, an agent is bound to exercise the

same amount of discretion as a man of ordinary

prudence would exercise in his own case;

and, if he does this, he is not responsible to

the principal for the acts or negligence of the

agent so selected. —In selecting such agent

for his principal, an agent is bound to exercise

the same amount of discretion as a man

of ordinary prudence would exercise in his own

case; and, if he does this, he is not responsible

to the principal for the acts or negligence of

the agent so selected." Illustrations (a) A instructs

B, a merchant, to buy a ship for him.

B employs a ship-surveyor of good reputation

to choose a ship for A. The surveyor makes

the choice negligently and the ship turns out

to be unseaworthy and is lost. B is not, but

the surveyor is, responsible to A. (a) A instructs

B, a merchant, to buy a ship for him.

B employs a ship-surveyor of good reputation

to choose a ship for A. The surveyor makes

the choice negligently and the ship turns out

to be unseaworthy and is lost. B is not, but the

surveyor is, responsible to A." (b) A consigns

goods to B, a merchant, for sale. B, in due

course, employs an auctioneer in good credit

to sell the goods of A, and allows the auctioneer

to receive the proceeds of the sale. The

auctioneer afterwards becomes insolvent without

having accounted for the proceeds. B is

not responsible to A for the proceeds. (b) A

consigns goods to B, a merchant, for sale. B,

in due course, employs an auctioneer in good

credit to sell the goods of A, and allows the

auctioneer to receive the proceeds of the sale.

The auctioneer afterwards becomes insolvent

without having accounted for the proceeds. B

is not responsible to A for the proceeds." 195.

Agent’s duty in naming such person.—In selecting

such agent for his principal, an agent

is bound to exercise the same amount of discretion

as a man of ordinary prudence would

exercise in his own case; and, if he does this, he

is not responsible to the principal for the acts

or negligence of the agent so selected. —In selecting

such agent for his principal, an agent

is bound to exercise the same amount of discretion

as a man of ordinary prudence would

exercise in his own case; and, if he does this,

he is not responsible to the principal for the

acts or negligence of the agent so selected." Illustrations

(a) A instructs B, a merchant, to

buy a ship for him. B employs a ship-surveyor

of good reputation to choose a ship for A. The

surveyor makes the choice negligently and the

ship turns out to be unseaworthy and is lost.

B is not, but the surveyor is, responsible to

A. (a) A instructs B, a merchant, to buy a

ship for him. B employs a ship-surveyor of

good reputation to choose a ship for A. The

surveyor makes the choice negligently and the

ship turns out to be unseaworthy and is lost.

B is not, but the surveyor is, responsible to

A." (b) A consigns goods to B, a merchant,

6. THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 6.6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!