Indian_Real_Estate_Law (2)
Indian Real Estate Laws 178tions to send them immediately to C, at Cuttack.B may sell the provisions at Calcutta,if they will not bear the journey to Cuttackwithout spoiling. (b) A consigns provisions toB at Calcutta, with directions to send themimmediately to C, at Cuttack. B may sell theprovisions at Calcutta, if they will not bearthe journey to Cuttack without spoiling." 189.Agent’s authority in an emergency.—An agenthas authority, in an emergency, to do all suchacts for the purpose of protecting his principalfrom loss as would be done by a person ofordinary prudence, in his own case under similarcircumstances. —An agent has authority,in an emergency, to do all such acts forthe purpose of protecting his principal fromloss as would be done by a person of ordinaryprudence, in his own case under similarcircumstances." Illustrations (a) An agent forsale may have goods repaired if it be necessary.(a) An agent for sale may have goods repairedif it be necessary." (b) A consigns provisionsto B at Calcutta, with directions to sendthem immediately to C, at Cuttack. B maysell the provisions at Calcutta, if they will notbear the journey to Cuttack without spoiling.(b) A consigns provisions to B at Calcutta,with directions to send them immediately toC, at Cuttack. B may sell the provisions atCalcutta, if they will not bear the journey toCuttack without spoiling." 190. When agentcannot delegate.—An agent cannot lawfullyemploy another to perform acts which he hasexpressly or impliedly undertaken to performpersonally, unless by the ordinary custom oftrade a sub-agent may, or, from the nature ofthe agency, a sub-agent must, be employed.—An agent cannot lawfully employ anotherto perform acts which he has expressly or impliedlyundertaken to perform personally, unlessby the ordinary custom of trade a subagentmay, or, from the nature of the agency,a sub-agent must, be employed." 191. ‘Subagent’defined.—A ‘sub-agent’ is a person employedby, and acting under the control of, theoriginal agent in the business of the agency.—A ‘sub-agent’ is a person employed by, andacting under the control of, the original agentin the business of the agency." 192. Representationof principal by sub-agent properlyappointed—Where a sub-agent is properly appointed,the principal is, so far as regards thirdpersons, represented by the sub-agent, and isbound by and responsible for his acts, as ifhe were an agent originally appointed by theprincipal. —Where a sub-agent is properlyappointed, the principal is, so far as regardsthird persons, represented by the sub-agent,and is bound by and responsible for his acts,as if he were an agent originally appointed bythe principal." Agent’s responsibility for subagent.—Theagent is responsible to the principalfor the acts of the sub-agent. —Theagent is responsible to the principal for theacts of the sub-agent." Sub-agent’s responsibility.—Thesub-agent is responsible for his actsto the agent, but not to the principal, exceptin cases of fraud or wilful wrong. —The subagentis responsible for his acts to the agent,but not to the principal, except in cases offraud or wilful wrong." 193. Agent’s responsibilityfor sub-agent appointed without authority.—Wherean agent, without having authorityto do so, has appointed a person toact as a sub-agent, the agent stands towardssuch person in the relation of a principal to anagent, and is responsible for his acts both tothe principal and to third persons; the principalis not represented by or responsible forthe acts of the person so employed, nor is thatperson responsible to the principal. —Wherean agent, without having authority to do so,has appointed a person to act as a sub-agent,the agent stands towards such person in therelation of a principal to an agent, and is responsiblefor his acts both to the principal andto third persons; the principal is not representedby or responsible for the acts of theperson so employed, nor is that person responsibleto the principal." 193. Agent’s responsibilityfor sub-agent appointed withoutauthority.—Where an agent, without havingauthority to do so, has appointed a personto act as a sub-agent, the agent stands towardssuch person in the relation of a principalto an agent, and is responsible for hisacts both to the principal and to third persons;the principal is not represented by or responsiblefor the acts of the person so employed,nor is that person responsible to the principal.6.6 6. THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872
179 Indian Real Estate Laws—Where an agent, without having authorityto do so, has appointed a person to act as asub-agent, the agent stands towards such personin the relation of a principal to an agent,and is responsible for his acts both to the principaland to third persons; the principal is notrepresented by or responsible for the acts ofthe person so employed, nor is that person responsibleto the principal." 194. Relation betweenprincipal and person duly appointed byagent to act in business of agency.—Where anagent, holding an express or implied authorityto name another person to act for the principalin the business of the agency, has namedanother person accordingly, such person is nota sub-agent, but an agent of the principal forsuch part of the business of the agency as is entrustedto him. —Where an agent, holding anexpress or implied authority to name anotherperson to act for the principal in the businessof the agency, has named another person accordingly,such person is not a sub-agent, butan agent of the principal for such part of thebusiness of the agency as is entrusted to him."Illustrations (a) A directs B, his solicitor, tosell his estate by auction, and to employ anauctioneer for the purpose. B names C, anauctioneer, to conduct the sale. C is not a subagent,but is A’s agent for the conduct of thesale. (b) A authorizes B, a merchant in Calcutta,to recover the moneys due to A from C& Co. B instructs D, a solicitor, to take legalproceedings against C & Co. for the recoveryof the money. D is not a sub-agent, butis solicitor for A. 195. Agent’s duty in namingsuch person.—In selecting such agent forhis principal, an agent is bound to exercise thesame amount of discretion as a man of ordinaryprudence would exercise in his own case;and, if he does this, he is not responsible tothe principal for the acts or negligence of theagent so selected. —In selecting such agentfor his principal, an agent is bound to exercisethe same amount of discretion as a manof ordinary prudence would exercise in his owncase; and, if he does this, he is not responsibleto the principal for the acts or negligence ofthe agent so selected." Illustrations (a) A instructsB, a merchant, to buy a ship for him.B employs a ship-surveyor of good reputationto choose a ship for A. The surveyor makesthe choice negligently and the ship turns outto be unseaworthy and is lost. B is not, butthe surveyor is, responsible to A. (a) A instructsB, a merchant, to buy a ship for him.B employs a ship-surveyor of good reputationto choose a ship for A. The surveyor makesthe choice negligently and the ship turns outto be unseaworthy and is lost. B is not, but thesurveyor is, responsible to A." (b) A consignsgoods to B, a merchant, for sale. B, in duecourse, employs an auctioneer in good creditto sell the goods of A, and allows the auctioneerto receive the proceeds of the sale. Theauctioneer afterwards becomes insolvent withouthaving accounted for the proceeds. B isnot responsible to A for the proceeds. (b) Aconsigns goods to B, a merchant, for sale. B,in due course, employs an auctioneer in goodcredit to sell the goods of A, and allows theauctioneer to receive the proceeds of the sale.The auctioneer afterwards becomes insolventwithout having accounted for the proceeds. Bis not responsible to A for the proceeds." 195.Agent’s duty in naming such person.—In selectingsuch agent for his principal, an agentis bound to exercise the same amount of discretionas a man of ordinary prudence wouldexercise in his own case; and, if he does this, heis not responsible to the principal for the actsor negligence of the agent so selected. —In selectingsuch agent for his principal, an agentis bound to exercise the same amount of discretionas a man of ordinary prudence wouldexercise in his own case; and, if he does this,he is not responsible to the principal for theacts or negligence of the agent so selected." Illustrations(a) A instructs B, a merchant, tobuy a ship for him. B employs a ship-surveyorof good reputation to choose a ship for A. Thesurveyor makes the choice negligently and theship turns out to be unseaworthy and is lost.B is not, but the surveyor is, responsible toA. (a) A instructs B, a merchant, to buy aship for him. B employs a ship-surveyor ofgood reputation to choose a ship for A. Thesurveyor makes the choice negligently and theship turns out to be unseaworthy and is lost.B is not, but the surveyor is, responsible toA." (b) A consigns goods to B, a merchant,6. THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 6.6
- Page 141 and 142: 127 Indian Real Estate Lawsthe accu
- Page 143 and 144: 129 Indian Real Estate Lawsment of
- Page 145 and 146: 131 Indian Real Estate Lawspossessi
- Page 147 and 148: 6The Indian Contract Act, 1872The I
- Page 149 and 150: 135 Indian Real Estate Lawsto fulfi
- Page 151 and 152: 137 Indian Real Estate Lawstracts a
- Page 153 and 154: 139 Indian Real Estate Lawsat 6 per
- Page 155 and 156: 141 Indian Real Estate Lawssuperint
- Page 157 and 158: 143 Indian Real Estate Lawsthing al
- Page 159 and 160: 145 Indian Real Estate Lawssions of
- Page 161 and 162: 147 Indian Real Estate Lawsmakes de
- Page 163 and 164: 149 Indian Real Estate Lawshim a no
- Page 165 and 166: 151 Indian Real Estate Lawsified ti
- Page 167 and 168: 153 Indian Real Estate Lawsing to w
- Page 169 and 170: 155 Indian Real Estate Lawshouse. B
- Page 171 and 172: 157 Indian Real Estate Lawsthe time
- Page 173 and 174: 159 Indian Real Estate Lawsrebuildi
- Page 175 and 176: 161 Indian Real Estate Lawswho righ
- Page 177 and 178: 163 Indian Real Estate Lawsto sell
- Page 179 and 180: 165 Indian Real Estate Lawsthe natu
- Page 181 and 182: 167 Indian Real Estate Lawsthe secu
- Page 183 and 184: 169 Indian Real Estate Lawsa less a
- Page 185 and 186: 171 Indian Real Estate Lawsaccident
- Page 187 and 188: 173 Indian Real Estate Lawsfrom tha
- Page 189 and 190: 175 Indian Real Estate Lawsand all
- Page 191: 177 Indian Real Estate Lawsis said
- Page 195 and 196: 181 Indian Real Estate LawsA. The n
- Page 197 and 198: 183 Indian Real Estate Lawsmoney to
- Page 199 and 200: 185 Indian Real Estate Lawsby perso
- Page 201 and 202: 187 Indian Real Estate Lawscovering
- Page 203 and 204: 189 Indian Real Estate Lawsmay caus
- Page 205 and 206: 191 Indian Real Estate Lawsnize the
- Page 207 and 208: 193 Indian Real Estate Lawssons on
- Page 209 and 210: 195 Indian Real Estate Laws“one
- Page 211 and 212: 7The Indian Stamp Act, 1899THE INDI
- Page 213 and 214: 199 Indian Real Estate Lawstime bei
- Page 215 and 216: 201 Indian Real Estate Laws1963), d
- Page 217 and 218: 203 Indian Real Estate Lawsfrom any
- Page 219 and 220: 205 Indian Real Estate Lawstion, an
- Page 221 and 222: 207 Indian Real Estate Lawsto recei
- Page 223 and 224: 209 Indian Real Estate Lawsa penalt
- Page 225 and 226: 211 Indian Real Estate Lawsment has
- Page 227 and 228: 213 Indian Real Estate Lawssection
- Page 229 and 230: 215 Indian Real Estate Lawsner prov
- Page 231: 217 Indian Real Estate Lawsby Act 5
179 Indian Real Estate Laws
—Where an agent, without having authority
to do so, has appointed a person to act as a
sub-agent, the agent stands towards such person
in the relation of a principal to an agent,
and is responsible for his acts both to the principal
and to third persons; the principal is not
represented by or responsible for the acts of
the person so employed, nor is that person responsible
to the principal." 194. Relation between
principal and person duly appointed by
agent to act in business of agency.—Where an
agent, holding an express or implied authority
to name another person to act for the principal
in the business of the agency, has named
another person accordingly, such person is not
a sub-agent, but an agent of the principal for
such part of the business of the agency as is entrusted
to him. —Where an agent, holding an
express or implied authority to name another
person to act for the principal in the business
of the agency, has named another person accordingly,
such person is not a sub-agent, but
an agent of the principal for such part of the
business of the agency as is entrusted to him."
Illustrations (a) A directs B, his solicitor, to
sell his estate by auction, and to employ an
auctioneer for the purpose. B names C, an
auctioneer, to conduct the sale. C is not a subagent,
but is A’s agent for the conduct of the
sale. (b) A authorizes B, a merchant in Calcutta,
to recover the moneys due to A from C
& Co. B instructs D, a solicitor, to take legal
proceedings against C & Co. for the recovery
of the money. D is not a sub-agent, but
is solicitor for A. 195. Agent’s duty in naming
such person.—In selecting such agent for
his principal, an agent is bound to exercise the
same amount of discretion as a man of ordinary
prudence would exercise in his own case;
and, if he does this, he is not responsible to
the principal for the acts or negligence of the
agent so selected. —In selecting such agent
for his principal, an agent is bound to exercise
the same amount of discretion as a man
of ordinary prudence would exercise in his own
case; and, if he does this, he is not responsible
to the principal for the acts or negligence of
the agent so selected." Illustrations (a) A instructs
B, a merchant, to buy a ship for him.
B employs a ship-surveyor of good reputation
to choose a ship for A. The surveyor makes
the choice negligently and the ship turns out
to be unseaworthy and is lost. B is not, but
the surveyor is, responsible to A. (a) A instructs
B, a merchant, to buy a ship for him.
B employs a ship-surveyor of good reputation
to choose a ship for A. The surveyor makes
the choice negligently and the ship turns out
to be unseaworthy and is lost. B is not, but the
surveyor is, responsible to A." (b) A consigns
goods to B, a merchant, for sale. B, in due
course, employs an auctioneer in good credit
to sell the goods of A, and allows the auctioneer
to receive the proceeds of the sale. The
auctioneer afterwards becomes insolvent without
having accounted for the proceeds. B is
not responsible to A for the proceeds. (b) A
consigns goods to B, a merchant, for sale. B,
in due course, employs an auctioneer in good
credit to sell the goods of A, and allows the
auctioneer to receive the proceeds of the sale.
The auctioneer afterwards becomes insolvent
without having accounted for the proceeds. B
is not responsible to A for the proceeds." 195.
Agent’s duty in naming such person.—In selecting
such agent for his principal, an agent
is bound to exercise the same amount of discretion
as a man of ordinary prudence would
exercise in his own case; and, if he does this, he
is not responsible to the principal for the acts
or negligence of the agent so selected. —In selecting
such agent for his principal, an agent
is bound to exercise the same amount of discretion
as a man of ordinary prudence would
exercise in his own case; and, if he does this,
he is not responsible to the principal for the
acts or negligence of the agent so selected." Illustrations
(a) A instructs B, a merchant, to
buy a ship for him. B employs a ship-surveyor
of good reputation to choose a ship for A. The
surveyor makes the choice negligently and the
ship turns out to be unseaworthy and is lost.
B is not, but the surveyor is, responsible to
A. (a) A instructs B, a merchant, to buy a
ship for him. B employs a ship-surveyor of
good reputation to choose a ship for A. The
surveyor makes the choice negligently and the
ship turns out to be unseaworthy and is lost.
B is not, but the surveyor is, responsible to
A." (b) A consigns goods to B, a merchant,
6. THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 6.6