Indian_Real_Estate_Law (2)

17.07.2022 Views

Indian Real Estate Laws 168the creditor has obtained by means of keepingsilence as to a material circumstance, isinvalid." Illustrations (a) A engages B as clerkto collect money for him. B fails to accountfor some of his receipts, and A in consequencecalls upon him to furnish security for his dulyaccounting. C gives his guarantee for B’s dulyaccounting. A does not acquaint C with B’sprevious conduct. B afterwards makes default.The guarantee is invalid. (a) A engages B asclerk to collect money for him. B fails to accountfor some of his receipts, and A in consequencecalls upon him to furnish security forhis duly accounting. C gives his guaranteefor B’s duly accounting. A does not acquaintC with B’s previous conduct. B afterwardsmakes default. The guarantee is invalid." (b)A guarantees to C payment for iron to be suppliedby him to B to the amount of 2,000 tons.B and C have privately agreed that B shouldpay five rupees per ton beyond the marketprice, such excess to be applied in liquidationof an old debt. This agreement is concealedfrom A. A is not liable as a surety. (b) A guaranteesto C payment for iron to be supplied byhim to B to the amount of 2,000 tons. B andC have privately agreed that B should pay fiverupees per ton beyond the market price, suchexcess to be applied in liquidation of an olddebt. This agreement is concealed from A. Ais not liable as a surety." 144. Guarantee oncontract that creditor shall not act on it untilco-surety joins.—Where a person gives a guaranteeupon a contract that the creditor shallnot act upon it until another person has joinedin it as co-surety, the guarantee is not valid ifthat other person does not join. —Where aperson gives a guarantee upon a contract thatthe creditor shall not act upon it until anotherperson has joined in it as co-surety, the guaranteeis not valid if that other person doesnot join." 145. Implied promise to indemnifysurety.—In every contract of guarantee there isan implied promise by the principal debtor toindemnify the surety, and the surety is entitledto recover from the principal debtor whateversum he has rightfully paid under the guarantee,but no sums which he has paid wrongfully.—In every contract of guarantee there is animplied promise by the principal debtor to indemnifythe surety, and the surety is entitledto recover from the principal debtor whateversum he has rightfully paid under the guarantee,but no sums which he has paid wrongfully."Illustrations (a) B is indebted to C, andA is surety for the debt. C demands paymentfrom A, and on his refusal sues him for theamount. A defends the suit, having reasonablegrounds for doing so, but he is compelledto pay the amount of debt with costs. He canrecover from B the amount paid by him forcosts, as well as the principal debt. (a) B isindebted to C, and A is surety for the debt. Cdemands payment from A, and on his refusalsues him for the amount. A defends the suit,having reasonable grounds for doing so, but heis compelled to pay the amount of debt withcosts. He can recover from B the amount paidby him for costs, as well as the principal debt."(b) C lends B a sum of money, and A, at therequest of B, accepts a bill of exchange drawnby B upon A to secure the amount. C, theholder of the bill, demands payment of it fromA, and, on A’s refusal to pay, sues him uponthe bill. A, not having reasonable grounds forso doing, defends the suit, and has to pay theamount of the bill and costs. He can recoverfrom B the amount of the bill, but not the sumpaid for costs, as there was no real ground fordefending the action. (b) C lends B a sumof money, and A, at the request of B, acceptsa bill of exchange drawn by B upon A to securethe amount. C, the holder of the bill,demands payment of it from A, and, on A’srefusal to pay, sues him upon the bill. A, nothaving reasonable grounds for so doing, defendsthe suit, and has to pay the amount ofthe bill and costs. He can recover from B theamount of the bill, but not the sum paid forcosts, as there was no real ground for defendingthe action." (c) A guarantees to C, to theextent of 2,000 rupees, payment for rice to besupplied by C to B. C supplies to B rice toa less amount than 2,000 rupees, but obtainsfrom A payment of the sum of 2,000 rupees inrespect of the rice supplied. A cannot recoverfrom B more than the price of the rice actuallysupplied. (c) A guarantees to C, to theextent of 2,000 rupees, payment for rice to besupplied by C to B. C supplies to B rice to6.6 6. THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872

169 Indian Real Estate Lawsa less amount than 2,000 rupees, but obtainsfrom A payment of the sum of 2,000 rupeesin respect of the rice supplied. A cannot recoverfrom B more than the price of the riceactually supplied." 146. Co-sureties liable tocontribute equally.—Where two or more personsare co-sureties for the same debt or duty,either jointly or severally, and whether underthe same or different contracts, and whetherwith or without the knowledge of each other,the co-sureties, in the absence of any contractto the contrary, are liable, as between themselves,to pay each an equal share of the wholedebt, or of that part of it which remains unpaidby the principal debtor.1 —Where twoor more persons are co-sureties for the samedebt or duty, either jointly or severally, andwhether under the same or different contracts,and whether with or without the knowledge ofeach other, the co-sureties, in the absence ofany contract to the contrary, are liable, as betweenthemselves, to pay each an equal shareof the whole debt, or of that part of it whichremains unpaid by the principal debtor.1" Illustrations(a) A, B and C are sureties to Dfor the sum of 3,000 rupees lent to E. E makesdefault in payment. A, B and C are liable, asbetween themselves, to pay 1,000 rupees each.(a) A, B and C are sureties to D for the sumof 3,000 rupees lent to E. E makes default inpayment. A, B and C are liable, as betweenthemselves, to pay 1,000 rupees each." (b) A,B and C are sureties to D for the sum of 1,000rupees lent to E, and there is a contract betweenA, B and C that A is to be responsibleto the extent of one-quarter, B to the extent ofone-quarter, and C to the extent of one-half.E makes default in payment. As between thesureties, A is liable to pay 250 rupees, B 250rupees, and C 500 rupees. (b) A, B and C aresureties to D for the sum of 1,000 rupees lent toE, and there is a contract between A, B and Cthat A is to be responsible to the extent of onequarter,B to the extent of one-quarter, and Cto the extent of one-half. E makes default inpayment. As between the sureties, A is liableto pay 250 rupees, B 250 rupees, and C 500rupees." 147. Liability of co-sureties bound indifferent sums.—Co-sureties who are bound indifferent sums are liable to pay equally as faras the limits of their respective obligations permit.—Co-sureties who are bound in differentsums are liable to pay equally as far as thelimits of their respective obligations permit."Illustrations (a) A, B and C, as sureties for D,enter into three several bonds, each in a differentpenalty, namely, A in the penalty of 10,000rupees, B in that of 20,000 rupees, C in thatof 40,000 rupees, conditioned for D’s duly accountingto E. D makes default to the extentof 30,000 rupees. A, B and C are liable to pay10,000 rupees. (a) A, B and C, as sureties forD, enter into three several bonds, each in adifferent penalty, namely, A in the penalty of10,000 rupees, B in that of 20,000 rupees, C inthat of 40,000 rupees, conditioned for D’s dulyaccounting to E. D makes default to the extentof 30,000 rupees. A, B and C are liable to pay10,000 rupees." (b) A, B and C, as sureties forD, enter into three several bonds, each in adifferent penalty, namely, A in the penalty of10,000 rupees, B in that of 20,000 rupees, C inthat of 40,000 rupees, conditioned for D’s dulyaccounting to E. D makes default to the extentof 40,000 rupees. A is liable to pay 10,000 rupees,and B and C 15,000 rupees each. (b) A,B and C, as sureties for D, enter into three severalbonds, each in a different penalty, namely,A in the penalty of 10,000 rupees, B in that of20,000 rupees, C in that of 40,000 rupees, conditionedfor D’s duly accounting to E. D makesdefault to the extent of 40,000 rupees. A is liableto pay 10,000 rupees, and B and C 15,000rupees each." (c) A, B and C, as sureties for D,enter into three several bonds, each in a differentpenalty, namely, A in the penalty of 10,000rupees, B in that of 20,000 rupees, C in thatof 40,000 rupees, conditioned for D’s duly accountingto E. D makes default to the extent of70,000 rupees. A, B and C have to pay the fullpenalty of his bond. (c) A, B and C, as suretiesfor D, enter into three several bonds, each ina different penalty, namely, A in the penaltyof 10,000 rupees, B in that of 20,000 rupees,C in that of 40,000 rupees, conditioned for D’sduly accounting to E. D makes default to theextent of 70,000 rupees. A, B and C have topay the full penalty of his bond." 148. ‘Bailment’,‘bailor’ and ‘bailee’ defined.—A ‘bailment’is the delivery of goods by one person6. THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 6.6

169 Indian Real Estate Laws

a less amount than 2,000 rupees, but obtains

from A payment of the sum of 2,000 rupees

in respect of the rice supplied. A cannot recover

from B more than the price of the rice

actually supplied." 146. Co-sureties liable to

contribute equally.—Where two or more persons

are co-sureties for the same debt or duty,

either jointly or severally, and whether under

the same or different contracts, and whether

with or without the knowledge of each other,

the co-sureties, in the absence of any contract

to the contrary, are liable, as between themselves,

to pay each an equal share of the whole

debt, or of that part of it which remains unpaid

by the principal debtor.1 —Where two

or more persons are co-sureties for the same

debt or duty, either jointly or severally, and

whether under the same or different contracts,

and whether with or without the knowledge of

each other, the co-sureties, in the absence of

any contract to the contrary, are liable, as between

themselves, to pay each an equal share

of the whole debt, or of that part of it which

remains unpaid by the principal debtor.1" Illustrations

(a) A, B and C are sureties to D

for the sum of 3,000 rupees lent to E. E makes

default in payment. A, B and C are liable, as

between themselves, to pay 1,000 rupees each.

(a) A, B and C are sureties to D for the sum

of 3,000 rupees lent to E. E makes default in

payment. A, B and C are liable, as between

themselves, to pay 1,000 rupees each." (b) A,

B and C are sureties to D for the sum of 1,000

rupees lent to E, and there is a contract between

A, B and C that A is to be responsible

to the extent of one-quarter, B to the extent of

one-quarter, and C to the extent of one-half.

E makes default in payment. As between the

sureties, A is liable to pay 250 rupees, B 250

rupees, and C 500 rupees. (b) A, B and C are

sureties to D for the sum of 1,000 rupees lent to

E, and there is a contract between A, B and C

that A is to be responsible to the extent of onequarter,

B to the extent of one-quarter, and C

to the extent of one-half. E makes default in

payment. As between the sureties, A is liable

to pay 250 rupees, B 250 rupees, and C 500

rupees." 147. Liability of co-sureties bound in

different sums.—Co-sureties who are bound in

different sums are liable to pay equally as far

as the limits of their respective obligations permit.

—Co-sureties who are bound in different

sums are liable to pay equally as far as the

limits of their respective obligations permit."

Illustrations (a) A, B and C, as sureties for D,

enter into three several bonds, each in a different

penalty, namely, A in the penalty of 10,000

rupees, B in that of 20,000 rupees, C in that

of 40,000 rupees, conditioned for D’s duly accounting

to E. D makes default to the extent

of 30,000 rupees. A, B and C are liable to pay

10,000 rupees. (a) A, B and C, as sureties for

D, enter into three several bonds, each in a

different penalty, namely, A in the penalty of

10,000 rupees, B in that of 20,000 rupees, C in

that of 40,000 rupees, conditioned for D’s duly

accounting to E. D makes default to the extent

of 30,000 rupees. A, B and C are liable to pay

10,000 rupees." (b) A, B and C, as sureties for

D, enter into three several bonds, each in a

different penalty, namely, A in the penalty of

10,000 rupees, B in that of 20,000 rupees, C in

that of 40,000 rupees, conditioned for D’s duly

accounting to E. D makes default to the extent

of 40,000 rupees. A is liable to pay 10,000 rupees,

and B and C 15,000 rupees each. (b) A,

B and C, as sureties for D, enter into three several

bonds, each in a different penalty, namely,

A in the penalty of 10,000 rupees, B in that of

20,000 rupees, C in that of 40,000 rupees, conditioned

for D’s duly accounting to E. D makes

default to the extent of 40,000 rupees. A is liable

to pay 10,000 rupees, and B and C 15,000

rupees each." (c) A, B and C, as sureties for D,

enter into three several bonds, each in a different

penalty, namely, A in the penalty of 10,000

rupees, B in that of 20,000 rupees, C in that

of 40,000 rupees, conditioned for D’s duly accounting

to E. D makes default to the extent of

70,000 rupees. A, B and C have to pay the full

penalty of his bond. (c) A, B and C, as sureties

for D, enter into three several bonds, each in

a different penalty, namely, A in the penalty

of 10,000 rupees, B in that of 20,000 rupees,

C in that of 40,000 rupees, conditioned for D’s

duly accounting to E. D makes default to the

extent of 70,000 rupees. A, B and C have to

pay the full penalty of his bond." 148. ‘Bailment’,

‘bailor’ and ‘bailee’ defined.—A ‘bailment’

is the delivery of goods by one person

6. THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 6.6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!