Indian_Real_Estate_Law (2)
Indian Real Estate Laws 126house, has a right of way over B ’s land. Theway is out of repair, or a tree is blown downand falls across it. A may enter on B ’s landand repair the way or remove the tree from it.(d) A, as owner of a certain field, has a right ofway over B ’s land. B renders the way impassable.A may deviate from the way and passover the adjoining land of B, provided thatthe deviation is reasonable. (e) A, as owner ofa certain house has a right or way over B ’sfield. A may remove rocks to make the way.(f) A has an easement of support from B ’swall. The wall gives way. A may enter uponB ’s land and repair the wall. (g) A has aneasement to have his land flooded by meansof a dam in B ’s stream. The dam is halfswept away by an inundation. A may enterupon B ’s land and repair the dam. 25. Liabilityfor expenses necessary for preservationof easements.-The expenses incurred in constructingworks, or making repairs, or doingany other act necessary for the use or preservationof an easement, must be defrayed bythe dominant owner. 26. Liability for damagefrom want of repair.-Where an easementis enjoyed by means of an artificial work, thedominant owner is liable to make compensationfor any damage to the servient heritagearising from the want of repair of such work1.27 Servient owner not bound to do anything.-The servient owner is not bound to do anythingfor the benefit of the dominant heritageand he is entitled, as against the dominantowner, to use the servient heritage in any wayconsistent with the enjoyment of the easement;but he must not do any act tending to restrictthe easement or to render its exerciseless convenient. Illustrations (a) A, as ownerof a house, has a right to lead water and sendsewage through B ’s land. B is not bound,as servient owner, to clear the watercourse orscour the sewer. (b) A grants a right of waythrough his land to B as owner of a field. Amay feed his cattle on grass growing on theway, provided that B ’s right of way is notthereby obstructed; but he must not build awall at the end of his land so as to prevent Bfrom going beyond it, nor must he narrow theway so as to render the exercise of the rightless easy than it was at the date of the grant.(c) A, in respect of his house, is entitled toan easement of support from B ’s wall. B isnot bound, as servient owner to keep the wallstanding and in repair. But he must not pulldown or weaken the wall so as to make it incapableof rendering the necessary support. (d)A, in respect of his mill, is entitled to a watercoursethrough B ’s land. B must not drivestakes so as to obstruct the watercourse. (e)A, in respect of his house, is entitled to a certainquantity of light passing over B ’s land.B must not plant trees so as to obstruct thepassage to A ’s windows of that quantity oflight. 28 Extent of easements. -With respectto the extent of easements and the mode oftheir enjoyment, the following provisions shalltake effect:- Easement of necessity. -An easementof necessity is co-extensive with the necessityas it existed when the easement wasimposed. Other easements. -The extent ofany other easement and the mode of its enjoymentmust be fixed with reference to theprobable intention of the parties, and the purposefor which the right was imposed or acquired.In the absence of evidence as to suchintention and purpose- (a) Right of way. -Aright of way of any one kind does not includea right of way of any other kind; (b) Rightto light or air acquired by grant. -The extentof a right to the passage of light or air to acertain window, door on other opening, imposedby a testamentary or non-testamentaryinstrument, is the quantity of light or air thatentered the opening at the time the testatordied or the non-testamentary instrument wasmade; (c) Prescriptive right to light or air. -The extent of a prescriptive right to the passageof light or air to a certain window, dooror other opening is that quantity of light orair which has been accustomed to enter thatopening during the whole of the prescriptiveperiod irrespectively of the purposes for whichit has been used; (d) Prescriptive right to polluteair or water. -The extent of a prescriptiveright to pollute air or water is the extent ofthe pollution at the commencement of the periodof user on completion of which the rightarose; and (e) Other prescriptive rights. -Theextent of every other prescriptive right and themode of its enjoyment must be determined by5.0 5. THE INDIAN EASEMENTS ACT, 1882
127 Indian Real Estate Lawsthe accustomed user of the right. 29 Increaseof easement. -The dominant owner cannot,by merely altering or adding to the dominantheritage, substantially increase an easement.Where an easement has been granted or bequeathedso that its extent shall be proportionateto the extent of the dominant heritage,if the dominant heritage is increased byalluvion, the easement is proportionately increased,and if the dominant heritage is diminishedby diluvion, the easement is proportionatelydiminished. Save as aforesaid, no easementis effected by any change in the extent ofthe dominant or the servient heritage. Illustrations(a) A, the owner of a mill, has acquireda prescriptive right, to divert to his mill partof the water of a stream. A alters the machineryof his mill. He cannot thereby increase hisright to divert water. (b) A has acquired aneasement to pollute a stream by carrying on amanufacture on its banks by which a certainquantity of foul matter is discharged into it.A extends his works and thereby increases thequantity discharged. He is responsible to thelower riparian owners for injury done by suchincrease. (c) A, as the owner of a farm, has aright to take, for the purpose of manuring hisfarm, leaves which have fallen from the treeson B ’s land. A buys a field and unites it to hisfarm. A is not thereby entitled to take leavesto manure this field. 30. Partition of dominantheritage.-Where a dominant heritage isdivided between two or more persons, the easementbecomes annexed to each of the shares,but not so as to increase substantially the burdenon the servient heritage: Provided thatsuch annexation is consistent with the terms ofthe instrument, decree or revenue-proceeding(if any) under which the division was made,and in the case of prescriptive rights, with theuser during the prescriptive period. Illustrations(a) A house to which a right of way by aparticular path is annexed is divided into twoparts, one of which is granted to A, the otherto B. Each is entitled, in respect of his part, toa right of way by the same path. (b) A houseto which is annexed the right of drawing waterfrom a well to the extent of fifty bucketsa day is divided into two distinct heritages,one of which is granted to A, the other to B,A and B are each entitled, in respect of hisheritage, to draw from the well fifty buckets aday; but the amount drawn by both must notexceed fifty buckets a day. (c) A, having in respectof his house an easement of light, dividesthe house into three district heritages. Eachof these continues to have the right to haveits windows unobstructed. 31 Obstruction incase of excessive user. -In the case of excessiveuser of an easement the servient ownermay, without prejudice to any other remediesto which he may be entitled, obstruct the user,but only on the servient heritage: Providedthat such user cannot be obstructed when theobstruction would interfere with the lawful enjoymentof the easement. Illustration A, havinga right to the free passage over B ’s landof light to four windows six feet by four, increasestheir size and number. It is impossibleto obstruct the passage of light to the newwindows without also obstructing the passageof light to the ancient windows. B cannotobstruct the excessive user. 32 Right to enjoymentwithout disturbance. -The owner oroccupier of the dominant heritage is entitledto enjoy the easement without disturbance byany other person. Illustration A, as owner ofa house, has a right of way over B ’s land. Cunlawfully enters on B ’s land and obstructsA in his right of way. A may sue C for compensation,not for the entry, but for the obstruction.33 Suit for disturbance of easement.-The owner of any interest in the dominantheritage, or the occupier of such heritage, mayinstitute a suit for compensation for the disturbanceof the easement or of any right accessorythereto; provided that the disturbancehas actually caused substantial damage to theplaintiff. Explanation I. -The doing of any actlikely to injure the plaintiff by affecting theevidence of the easement, or by materially diminishingthe value of the dominant heritage,is substantial damage within the meaning ofthis section and section 34. Explanation II. -Where the easement disturbed is a right to thefree passage of light passing to the openings ina house, no damage is substantial within themeaning of this section unless it falls withinthe first Explanation, or interferes materiallywith the physical comfort of the plaintiff, or5. THE INDIAN EASEMENTS ACT, 1882 5.0
- Page 91 and 92: 3IntroductionIndian Stamp Act, 1899
- Page 93 and 94: 4The Transfer of Property Act, 1882
- Page 95 and 96: 81 Indian Real Estate Lawsnot, but
- Page 97 and 98: 83 Indian Real Estate Laws4.14 Tran
- Page 99 and 100: 85 Indian Real Estate Laws(a) A tra
- Page 101 and 102: 87 Indian Real Estate Lawsby an ins
- Page 103 and 104: 89 Indian Real Estate Lawstract and
- Page 105 and 106: 91 Indian Real Estate Laws4.45 Tran
- Page 107 and 108: 93 Indian Real Estate Lawsconveyanc
- Page 109 and 110: 95 Indian Real Estate Lawsand the i
- Page 111 and 112: 97 Indian Real Estate Laws4.53 Obli
- Page 113 and 114: 99 Indian Real Estate Lawswill at t
- Page 115 and 116: 101 Indian Real Estate Laws(a) or c
- Page 117 and 118: 103 Indian Real Estate Lawsattended
- Page 119 and 120: 105 Indian Real Estate Lawsgage, th
- Page 121 and 122: 107 Indian Real Estate Lawsreasonab
- Page 123 and 124: 109 Indian Real Estate Lawsor agent
- Page 125 and 126: 111 Indian Real Estate Lawsat the p
- Page 127 and 128: 113 Indian Real Estate Lawsnot a wa
- Page 129 and 130: 115 Indian Real Estate Lawsof the d
- Page 131 and 132: 117 Indian Real Estate Laws4.119 Mo
- Page 133 and 134: 5The Indian Easements Act, 18821 Sh
- Page 135 and 136: 121 Indian Real Estate Lawswater un
- Page 137 and 138: 123 Indian Real Estate Lawsis entit
- Page 139: 125 Indian Real Estate Lawstained i
- Page 143 and 144: 129 Indian Real Estate Lawsment of
- Page 145 and 146: 131 Indian Real Estate Lawspossessi
- Page 147 and 148: 6The Indian Contract Act, 1872The I
- Page 149 and 150: 135 Indian Real Estate Lawsto fulfi
- Page 151 and 152: 137 Indian Real Estate Lawstracts a
- Page 153 and 154: 139 Indian Real Estate Lawsat 6 per
- Page 155 and 156: 141 Indian Real Estate Lawssuperint
- Page 157 and 158: 143 Indian Real Estate Lawsthing al
- Page 159 and 160: 145 Indian Real Estate Lawssions of
- Page 161 and 162: 147 Indian Real Estate Lawsmakes de
- Page 163 and 164: 149 Indian Real Estate Lawshim a no
- Page 165 and 166: 151 Indian Real Estate Lawsified ti
- Page 167 and 168: 153 Indian Real Estate Lawsing to w
- Page 169 and 170: 155 Indian Real Estate Lawshouse. B
- Page 171 and 172: 157 Indian Real Estate Lawsthe time
- Page 173 and 174: 159 Indian Real Estate Lawsrebuildi
- Page 175 and 176: 161 Indian Real Estate Lawswho righ
- Page 177 and 178: 163 Indian Real Estate Lawsto sell
- Page 179 and 180: 165 Indian Real Estate Lawsthe natu
- Page 181 and 182: 167 Indian Real Estate Lawsthe secu
- Page 183 and 184: 169 Indian Real Estate Lawsa less a
- Page 185 and 186: 171 Indian Real Estate Lawsaccident
- Page 187 and 188: 173 Indian Real Estate Lawsfrom tha
- Page 189 and 190: 175 Indian Real Estate Lawsand all
Indian Real Estate Laws 126
house, has a right of way over B ’s land. The
way is out of repair, or a tree is blown down
and falls across it. A may enter on B ’s land
and repair the way or remove the tree from it.
(d) A, as owner of a certain field, has a right of
way over B ’s land. B renders the way impassable.
A may deviate from the way and pass
over the adjoining land of B, provided that
the deviation is reasonable. (e) A, as owner of
a certain house has a right or way over B ’s
field. A may remove rocks to make the way.
(f) A has an easement of support from B ’s
wall. The wall gives way. A may enter upon
B ’s land and repair the wall. (g) A has an
easement to have his land flooded by means
of a dam in B ’s stream. The dam is half
swept away by an inundation. A may enter
upon B ’s land and repair the dam. 25. Liability
for expenses necessary for preservation
of easements.-The expenses incurred in constructing
works, or making repairs, or doing
any other act necessary for the use or preservation
of an easement, must be defrayed by
the dominant owner. 26. Liability for damage
from want of repair.-Where an easement
is enjoyed by means of an artificial work, the
dominant owner is liable to make compensation
for any damage to the servient heritage
arising from the want of repair of such work1.
27 Servient owner not bound to do anything.
-The servient owner is not bound to do anything
for the benefit of the dominant heritage
and he is entitled, as against the dominant
owner, to use the servient heritage in any way
consistent with the enjoyment of the easement;
but he must not do any act tending to restrict
the easement or to render its exercise
less convenient. Illustrations (a) A, as owner
of a house, has a right to lead water and send
sewage through B ’s land. B is not bound,
as servient owner, to clear the watercourse or
scour the sewer. (b) A grants a right of way
through his land to B as owner of a field. A
may feed his cattle on grass growing on the
way, provided that B ’s right of way is not
thereby obstructed; but he must not build a
wall at the end of his land so as to prevent B
from going beyond it, nor must he narrow the
way so as to render the exercise of the right
less easy than it was at the date of the grant.
(c) A, in respect of his house, is entitled to
an easement of support from B ’s wall. B is
not bound, as servient owner to keep the wall
standing and in repair. But he must not pull
down or weaken the wall so as to make it incapable
of rendering the necessary support. (d)
A, in respect of his mill, is entitled to a watercourse
through B ’s land. B must not drive
stakes so as to obstruct the watercourse. (e)
A, in respect of his house, is entitled to a certain
quantity of light passing over B ’s land.
B must not plant trees so as to obstruct the
passage to A ’s windows of that quantity of
light. 28 Extent of easements. -With respect
to the extent of easements and the mode of
their enjoyment, the following provisions shall
take effect:- Easement of necessity. -An easement
of necessity is co-extensive with the necessity
as it existed when the easement was
imposed. Other easements. -The extent of
any other easement and the mode of its enjoyment
must be fixed with reference to the
probable intention of the parties, and the purpose
for which the right was imposed or acquired.
In the absence of evidence as to such
intention and purpose- (a) Right of way. -A
right of way of any one kind does not include
a right of way of any other kind; (b) Right
to light or air acquired by grant. -The extent
of a right to the passage of light or air to a
certain window, door on other opening, imposed
by a testamentary or non-testamentary
instrument, is the quantity of light or air that
entered the opening at the time the testator
died or the non-testamentary instrument was
made; (c) Prescriptive right to light or air. -
The extent of a prescriptive right to the passage
of light or air to a certain window, door
or other opening is that quantity of light or
air which has been accustomed to enter that
opening during the whole of the prescriptive
period irrespectively of the purposes for which
it has been used; (d) Prescriptive right to pollute
air or water. -The extent of a prescriptive
right to pollute air or water is the extent of
the pollution at the commencement of the period
of user on completion of which the right
arose; and (e) Other prescriptive rights. -The
extent of every other prescriptive right and the
mode of its enjoyment must be determined by
5.0 5. THE INDIAN EASEMENTS ACT, 1882