Essential Cell Biology 5th edition
472PANEL 14–1 REDOX POTENTIALSHOW REDOX POTENTIALS ARE MEASUREDe –A reduced and A oxidizedin equimolar amountsvoltmetersalt bridge1 M H + and1 atmosphere H 2 gasTHE STANDARD REDOX POTENTIAL, E′The standard redox potential for a redox pair,defined as E 0 , is measured for a standard statewhere all of the reactants are at a concentration of1 M, including H + . Since biological reactions occur atpH 7, biologists instead define the standard state asA reduced = A oxidized and H + = 10 –7 M. This standardredox potential is designated by the symbol E 0′ , inplace of E 0 .0One beaker (left) contains substance A with an equimolarmixture of the reduced (A reduced ) and oxidized (A oxidized )members of its redox pair. The other beaker contains thehydrogen reference standard (2H + + 2e – H 2 ), whose redoxpotential is arbitrarily assigned as zero by internationalagreement. (A salt bridge formed from a concentrated KClsolution allows K + and Cl – to move between the beakers asrequired to neutralize the charges when electrons flowbetween the beakers.) The metal wire (dark blue) provides aresistance-free path for electrons, and a voltmeter thenmeasures the redox potential of substance A. If electrons flowfrom A reduced to H + , as indicated here, the redox pair formedby substance A is said to have a negative redox potential. Ifthey instead flow from H 2 to A oxidized , the redox pair is said tohave a positive redox potential.examples of redox reactionsstandard redoxpotential E 0′–H 2 O ½O 2 + 2H + + 2e – +820 mVNADH NAD + + H + + 2e –320 mVreduced oxidizedubiquinone ubiquinone+ 2H + + 2e – +30 mVcytochrome reducedcoxidizedcytochrome c+ e – +230 mVCALCULATION OF ΔG o FROMREDOX POTENTIALSTo determine the energy change for an electrontransfer, the ΔG o of the reaction (kJ/mole) iscalculated as follows:ΔG o = –n(0.096) ΔE 0′ , where n is the number ofelectrons transferred across a redox potentialchange of ΔE′0 millivolts (mV), andΔE 0′ = E 0′(acceptor) – E 0′(donor)EXAMPLE:e –EFFECT OF CONCENTRATION CHANGESAs explained in Chapter 3 (see p. 93), the actualfree-energy change for a reaction, ΔG, depends on theconcentrations of the reactants and generally will bedifferent from the standard free-energy change, ΔG o .The standard redox potentials are for a 1:1 mixture ofthe redox pair. For example, the standard redoxpotential of –320 mV is for a 1:1 mixture of NADH andNAD + . But when there is an excess of NADH over NAD + ,electron transfer from NADH to an electron acceptorbecomes more favorable. This is reflected by a morenegative redox potential and a more negative ΔG forelectron transfer.NADHoxidizedubiquinoneNAD + NAD +1:1 mixture ofNADH and NAD +reducedubiquinone1:1 mixture of oxidizedand reduced ubiquinoneFor the transfer of one electron from NADH toubiquinone:ΔE′0 = +30 – (–320) = +350 mVΔG o = –n(0.096) ΔE 0′ = –1(0.096)(350) = –34 kJ/moleA similar calculation reveals that the transfer of oneelectron from ubiquinone to oxygen has an even morefavorable ΔG o of –76 kJ/mole. The ΔG o value for thetransfer of one electron from NADH to oxygen is thesum of these two values, –110 kJ/mole.excess NADH standard 1:1excess NAD +mixtureNADHstronger electrondonation(more negative E′ )standard redoxpotential of–320 mVweaker electrondonation(more positive E′ )Panel e14.01/panel 14.01
Molecular Mechanisms of Electron Transport and Proton Pumping473O CH e – + H + e – + H +3O CH Figure 14–21 Quinones carry electrons3within the lipid bilayer. The quinone in themitochondrial electron-transport chain isOO CH 3H OO CH 3 called ubiquinone. It picks up one H + fromthe aqueous environment for every electronit accepts, and it can carry two electrons asH 3 COH 3 CO H part of its hydrogen atoms (red). When thisreduced ubiquinone donates its electrons tothe next carrier in the chain, the protons arehydrophobicreleased. Its long, hydrophobic hydrocarbonhydrocarbon tailtail confines ubiquinone to the innermitochondrial membrane.oxidizedreducedubiquinoneubiquinoneto a respiratory complex, it can move within the complex by skippingfrom one embedded metal ion to another ion with an even greater affinityfor electrons.When electrons pass from one respiratory complex to the next, in contrast,they are ferried by electron carriers that can diffuse freely within oralong the lipid bilayer. These mobile molecules pick up electrons fromone complex and deliver them to the next in line. In the mitochondrialrespiratory chain, for example, a small, hydrophobic molecule calledECB5 e14.23/14.23ubiquinone picks up electrons from the NADH dehydrogenase complexand delivers them to the cytochrome c reductase complex (see Figure14–14). A related quinone functions similarly during electron transport inphotosynthesis. A ubiquinone molecule can accept or donate either oneor two electrons, and it picks up one H + from water with each electronthat it carries (Figure 14–21). Its redox potential of +30 mV places ubiquinonebetween the NADH dehydrogenase complex and the cytochrome QUESTION 14–6c reductase complex in terms of its tendency to gain or lose electrons—which explains why ubiquinone receives electrons from the former and At many steps in the electrontransportchain, Fe ions are useddonates them to the latter (Figure 14–22). Ubiquinone also serves as theentry point for electrons donated by the FADH 2 that is generated both as part of heme or FeS clusters toduring the citric acid cycle and from fatty acid oxidation (see Figures bind the electrons in transit. Why13−11 and 13−12).do these functional groups thatcarry out the chemistry of electronThe redox potentials of different metal complexes influence where they transfer need to be bound toare used along the electron-transport chain. Iron–sulfur centers have relativelylow affinities for electrons and thus are prominent in the electron why this is necessary.proteins? Provide several reasonscarriers that operate in the early part of the chain. An iron–sulfur center_ 400_NADH NAD +300redox potential (mV)_ 200_ 1000100200300400500600QNADHdehydrogenasecomplexH + H +ubiquinoneccytochrome creductase complexH + H +cytochrome coxidase complexcytochrome c10080604020free energy per electron (kJ/mole)700800½ O 2 + 2direction of electron flowH 2 O0Figure 14–22 Redox potential increasesalong the mitochondrial electrontransportchain. The biggest increases inredox potential occur across each of thethree respiratory enzyme complexes, whichallows each of them to pump protons.
- Page 455 and 456: Ion Channels and Nerve Cell Signali
- Page 457 and 458: Essential Concepts423• Ion channe
- Page 459: Questions425QUESTION 12-18Amino aci
- Page 462 and 463: 428 CHAPTER 13 How Cells Obtain Ene
- Page 464 and 465: 430 CHAPTER 13 How Cells Obtain Ene
- Page 466 and 467: 432 CHAPTER 13 How Cells Obtain Ene
- Page 468 and 469: 434 CHAPTER 13 How Cells Obtain Ene
- Page 470 and 471: 436PANEL 13-1 DETAILS OF THE 10 STE
- Page 472 and 473: 438 CHAPTER 13 How Cells Obtain Ene
- Page 474 and 475: 440 CHAPTER 13 How Cells Obtain Ene
- Page 476 and 477: 442PANEL 13-2 THE COMPLETE CITRIC A
- Page 478 and 479: 444HOW WE KNOWUNRAVELING THE CITRIC
- Page 480 and 481: 446 CHAPTER 13 How Cells Obtain Ene
- Page 482 and 483: 448 CHAPTER 13 How Cells Obtain Ene
- Page 484 and 485: 450 CHAPTER 13 How Cells Obtain Ene
- Page 486 and 487: 452 CHAPTER 13 How Cells Obtain Ene
- Page 489 and 490: CHAPTER FOURTEEN14Energy Generation
- Page 491 and 492: Energy Generation in Mitochondria a
- Page 493 and 494: Mitochondria and Oxidative Phosphor
- Page 495 and 496: Mitochondria and Oxidative Phosphor
- Page 497 and 498: Mitochondria and Oxidative Phosphor
- Page 499 and 500: Mitochondria and Oxidative Phosphor
- Page 501 and 502: Mitochondria and Oxidative Phosphor
- Page 503 and 504: Molecular Mechanisms of Electron Tr
- Page 505: Molecular Mechanisms of Electron Tr
- Page 509 and 510: Molecular Mechanisms of Electron Tr
- Page 511 and 512: Molecular Mechanisms of Electron Tr
- Page 513 and 514: Chloroplasts and Photosynthesis479c
- Page 515 and 516: Chloroplasts and Photosynthesis481F
- Page 517 and 518: Chloroplasts and Photosynthesis483T
- Page 519 and 520: Chloroplasts and Photosynthesis485r
- Page 521 and 522: Chloroplasts and Photosynthesis487s
- Page 523 and 524: The Evolution of Energy-Generating
- Page 525 and 526: Essential Concepts491(A)1 µm(B)Fig
- Page 527 and 528: Questions493C. The electrochemical
- Page 529 and 530: CHAPTER FIFTEEN15Intracellular Comp
- Page 531 and 532: Membrane-Enclosed Organelles497mito
- Page 533 and 534: Membrane-Enclosed Organelles499DNAm
- Page 535 and 536: Protein Sorting501proteins that are
- Page 537 and 538: Protein Sorting503they have the sam
- Page 539 and 540: Protein Sorting505prospective nucle
- Page 541 and 542: Protein Sorting507the first six mon
- Page 543 and 544: Protein Sorting509mRNAgrowingpolype
- Page 545 and 546: Vesicular Transport511hydrophobicst
- Page 547 and 548: Vesicular Transport513(A)(C)25 nm(B
- Page 549 and 550: Secretory Pathways515receptorcargo
- Page 551 and 552: Secretory Pathways517KEY:= glucose=
- Page 553 and 554: Secretory Pathways519cisGolginetwor
- Page 555 and 556: Secretory Pathways521ERGolgiapparat
472
PANEL 14–1 REDOX POTENTIALS
HOW REDOX POTENTIALS ARE MEASURED
e –
A reduced and A oxidized
in equimolar amounts
voltmeter
salt bridge
1 M H + and
1 atmosphere H 2 gas
THE STANDARD REDOX POTENTIAL, E′
The standard redox potential for a redox pair,
defined as E 0 , is measured for a standard state
where all of the reactants are at a concentration of
1 M, including H + . Since biological reactions occur at
pH 7, biologists instead define the standard state as
A reduced = A oxidized and H + = 10 –7 M. This standard
redox potential is designated by the symbol E 0
′ , in
place of E 0 .
0
One beaker (left) contains substance A with an equimolar
mixture of the reduced (A reduced ) and oxidized (A oxidized )
members of its redox pair. The other beaker contains the
hydrogen reference standard (2H + + 2e – H 2 ), whose redox
potential is arbitrarily assigned as zero by international
agreement. (A salt bridge formed from a concentrated KCl
solution allows K + and Cl – to move between the beakers as
required to neutralize the charges when electrons flow
between the beakers.) The metal wire (dark blue) provides a
resistance-free path for electrons, and a voltmeter then
measures the redox potential of substance A. If electrons flow
from A reduced to H + , as indicated here, the redox pair formed
by substance A is said to have a negative redox potential. If
they instead flow from H 2 to A oxidized , the redox pair is said to
have a positive redox potential.
examples of redox reactions
standard redox
potential E 0
′
–
H 2 O ½O 2 + 2H + + 2e – +820 mV
NADH NAD + + H + + 2e –320 mV
reduced oxidized
ubiquinone ubiquinone
+ 2H + + 2e – +30 mV
cytochrome reduced
c
oxidized
cytochrome c
+ e – +230 mV
CALCULATION OF ΔG o FROM
REDOX POTENTIALS
To determine the energy change for an electron
transfer, the ΔG o of the reaction (kJ/mole) is
calculated as follows:
ΔG o = –n(0.096) ΔE 0
′ , where n is the number of
electrons transferred across a redox potential
change of ΔE′
0 millivolts (mV), and
ΔE 0
′ = E 0
′(acceptor) – E 0
′(donor)
EXAMPLE:
e –
EFFECT OF CONCENTRATION CHANGES
As explained in Chapter 3 (see p. 93), the actual
free-energy change for a reaction, ΔG, depends on the
concentrations of the reactants and generally will be
different from the standard free-energy change, ΔG o .
The standard redox potentials are for a 1:1 mixture of
the redox pair. For example, the standard redox
potential of –320 mV is for a 1:1 mixture of NADH and
NAD + . But when there is an excess of NADH over NAD + ,
electron transfer from NADH to an electron acceptor
becomes more favorable. This is reflected by a more
negative redox potential and a more negative ΔG for
electron transfer.
NADH
oxidized
ubiquinone
NAD + NAD +
1:1 mixture of
NADH and NAD +
reduced
ubiquinone
1:1 mixture of oxidized
and reduced ubiquinone
For the transfer of one electron from NADH to
ubiquinone:
ΔE′
0 = +30 – (–320) = +350 mV
ΔG o = –n(0.096) ΔE 0
′ = –1(0.096)(350) = –34 kJ/mole
A similar calculation reveals that the transfer of one
electron from ubiquinone to oxygen has an even more
favorable ΔG o of –76 kJ/mole. The ΔG o value for the
transfer of one electron from NADH to oxygen is the
sum of these two values, –110 kJ/mole.
excess NADH standard 1:1
excess NAD +
mixture
NADH
stronger electron
donation
(more negative E′ )
standard redox
potential of
–320 mV
weaker electron
donation
(more positive E′ )
Panel e14.01/panel 14.01