19.06.2022 Views

Dominican Republic and Haiti: Country Studies

by Helen Chapin Metz et al

by Helen Chapin Metz et al

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Dominican</strong> <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Haiti</strong>: <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Studies</strong><br />

costs of a surveyor. Heirs occasionally survey l<strong>and</strong> before taking<br />

but more frequently heirs divide plots among<br />

possession of it,<br />

themselves in the presence of community witnesses <strong>and</strong> often a<br />

notary. Undivided plots are often used for grazing or farmed<br />

on a rotating basis. Families commonly sell l<strong>and</strong> to raise cash<br />

for such contingencies as funerals or to pav the expenses of<br />

emigration. Purchasers often hold l<strong>and</strong> with a notarized<br />

receipt rather than formal registtation <strong>and</strong> transfer of tide.<br />

Peasants have a strong sense of identity as <strong>Haiti</strong>ans <strong>and</strong> cultivators<br />

of the l<strong>and</strong>. However, thev have little or no sense of class<br />

solidarity, <strong>and</strong> rivalries among peasant families <strong>and</strong> local factions<br />

are common. Since the 1940s, small rotating labor groups<br />

have tended to replace large labor societies more common earlier<br />

in the century. Peasants organize work parties <strong>and</strong><br />

exchange labor to supplement family labor <strong>and</strong> meet the intensive<br />

labor requirements of peasant agriculture. Peasants also<br />

buy <strong>and</strong> sell daily wage labor.<br />

Rural social arrangements are firmly rooted in kin ties, fictive<br />

kinship, patron-client relations, other special ties <strong>and</strong> obligations,<br />

<strong>and</strong> competing factions. Community solidaritv is<br />

weakly developed. In the late 1950s, outside development agencies<br />

began to organize peasant councils as a self-help strategy to<br />

promote community development. By the 1980s, such councils<br />

had been organized in most of rural <strong>Haiti</strong>. In the early 1980s,<br />

the government ofJean-Claude Duvalier sought to politicize<br />

<strong>and</strong> control this widespread network of rural councils. Despite<br />

rhetoric of local autonomy <strong>and</strong> democratic representation,<br />

peasant councils came to be dominated by traditional power<br />

holders <strong>and</strong> outside interests.<br />

In the 1960s <strong>and</strong> 1970s, church leaders <strong>and</strong> other reformers<br />

promoted small pre-cooperative groups called gwoupman in<br />

lieu of the old community councils. The most successful of<br />

these groups were built on indigenous sociocultural forms oriented<br />

to kinship, labor exchange, or traditional rotating credit<br />

groups. In the period since 1986, the gwoupman movement <strong>and</strong><br />

other peasant organizations have been severely persecuted<br />

under various military regimes, especially under the de facto<br />

government of Raoul Cedras (1991-94). With the return of<br />

constitutional rule in late 1994, this persecution ceased. In the<br />

latter 1990s, few of the older community councils remained<br />

active, <strong>and</strong> the small group movement has exp<strong>and</strong>ed into many<br />

areas of rural <strong>Haiti</strong>. In a distinct break with the past, numerous<br />

members of local peasant organizations have been elected to<br />

334

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!