19.06.2022 Views

Dominican Republic and Haiti: Country Studies

by Helen Chapin Metz et al

by Helen Chapin Metz et al

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Dominican</strong> <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Haiti</strong>: <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Studies</strong><br />

JCE was the use of ad-hoc mediating <strong>and</strong> support commissions<br />

or international observers or mediators.<br />

As a consequence of the 1990 electoral crisis, an electoral<br />

law was passed in 1992 that instituted a number of reforms.<br />

This law provided the JCE with greater legal budgetary independence.<br />

It also provided that henceforth <strong>Dominican</strong> citizens<br />

would receive a single card that would serve both as an identity<br />

card <strong>and</strong> an electoral card; prior to this law, the JCE shared<br />

responsibility with the executive branch for the management<br />

of the offices that provided the personal identification cards<br />

that citizens had to present along with electoral cards distributed<br />

by the JCE in order to vote. Naturally, this enhanced fears<br />

by opposition parties that the emission of identity cards could<br />

be manipulated to favor the government party. Like much of<br />

the rest of the state, the JCE has also paid woefully low salaries,<br />

a situation that has improved somewhat since 1996.<br />

As a consequence of the 1992 law, building up to the 1994<br />

elections the JCE leadership was exp<strong>and</strong>ed from three to five<br />

judges—three chosen by the governing PRSC party <strong>and</strong> two by<br />

opposition parties. The JCE also issued a new national <strong>and</strong><br />

electoral identity card <strong>and</strong> prepared a new electoral roll, which<br />

ended up being flawed <strong>and</strong> at the center of significant fraud in<br />

the elections carried out that year. Thus, the JCE remained an<br />

institutionally weak, politicized institution.<br />

For the 1996 elections, rather than choosingJCE judges with<br />

partisan criteria paramount, independent figures were named,<br />

who remained in place for the 1998 elections. Both these elections<br />

were relatively trouble free. However, partisan criteria<br />

again played a h<strong>and</strong> when JCE judges were chosen to oversee<br />

the presidential election of the year 2000. In August 1998, the<br />

PRD-dominated Senate named all five of the JCE judges without<br />

consultation with the opposition parties. This action once<br />

again made the composition of the JCE an issue of serious contention<br />

among the country's major political parties. Finally,<br />

after extensive negotiations, in June 1999 the Senate named<br />

two additional JCE judges, one identified with the PLD <strong>and</strong> the<br />

other with the PRSC.<br />

The electoral law of 1997 (Law 275-97) m<strong>and</strong>ated a number<br />

of important changes in electoral procedures. In addition to<br />

requiring public funding of political parties, the law instituted<br />

a 25 percent quota for female c<strong>and</strong>idates. The requirement<br />

helped improve female representation in the Chamber of Deputies,<br />

which went from 8.6 percent female representation in<br />

188

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!