Dominican Republic and Haiti: Country Studies

by Helen Chapin Metz et al by Helen Chapin Metz et al

19.06.2022 Views

Dominican Republic and Haiti: Country Studies executive, interrogate members of the cabinet, and legislate on all matters not within the constitutional mandate of other branches of government or contrary to the constitution. By a two-thirds vote of the full membership in each chamber, the Congress can also override a presidential veto of a law previously approved by simple majority. Historically, the Dominican Congress has been a weak, submissive branch. Its facilities, staffing, offices, and library have been woefully inadequate; in addition, the Court of Accounts, which examines the country's finances and reports to the Congress, has not provided complete or timely information. In the past several years, some modest steps toward improvement have been taken. Because the selection of candidates to the party lists has been determined by party leaders, legislators have tended to be more responsive to these leaders than to voters. Turnover has been extremely high: from 1970 to 1998, only 18 percent of incumbent senators and only 17 percent of incumbent deputies were reelected to a subsequent term. The turnover has further encouraged legislative weakness and executive predominance. Many legislators have seen their position in Congress as temporarily providing them with an opportunity to focus on issues of personal and parochial gain, rather than on broader ideological or policy issues. The high turnover has also tended to discourage emphasis on building up the institution of the Congress itself. Finally, because the judicial branch until very recently has also tended to be extremely submissive to the executive branch, there has been little the legislature could actually do to prevent abuse of power by the president. This was especially the case with Balaguer, who governed the country with considerable discretion and little effective congressional oversight. Congress showed more independence during the PRE) governments of Antonio Guzman and Salvador Jorge Blanco between 1978 and 1986, and again under the PLD government of Leonel Fernandez (1996-2000). In addition, during his 1986-96 period in office, Balaguer was more limited in his ability to ignore or sidestep Congress than he had been during the 1966-78 period when he had comfortable majorities in both chambers. Even the earlier Balaguer administrations occasionally confronted an obstructionist Congress, however. Indeed, the major power of Congress has been to obstruct and to delay—whether in the pursuit of personal or parochial gain, responding to the wishes of interest groups or other societal 178

Dominican Republic: Government and Politics allies, or as a result of genuine policy or ideological differences. The PRD governments were especially frustrated by factions within their own parties, although they also faced opposition from the PRSC and PLD representatives. President Fernandez, in turn, has been confronted particularly with opposition from the PRD, especially after it gained congressional seats in the 1998 election. The Judiciary Judicial power is exercised by the Supreme Court ofJustice and by other courts created by the constitution and by law. The country has general courts, which consider civil, criminal, commercial, and labor issues (except for labor matters in the major urban areas of Santo Domingo, Santiago, San Francisco de Macoris, and San Pedro de Macons) , and certain specialized courts, namely land courts, labor courts (in the country's four major urban areas), tax courts, and new children's courts that were mandated by a 1994 law. The country also has other courts or offices with judicial functions, which do not form a part of the judicial branch. These include the Police Tribunal, the Military Tribunal, and the Central Electoral Board, which administers elections and is the unappealable arbiter of all disputes related to elections, with complaints being heard in the first instance by municipal electoral boards. Under the Supreme Court there are nine Courts of Appeals, which hear appeals of decisions from Courts of First Instance. There are eighty-three of these Courts of First Instance, which, unlike the Supreme Court or the Appeals Courts, are presided over by only one judge. There are also 214justices of the peace, who hear cases of small claims or minor crimes. In addition, there are also four Labor Courts of Appeal, and single Courts of Appeal for tax and for land issues; under these are the respective specialized courts of first instance. Centralized and hierarchical, the Dominican legal system is patterned after the French system; its basic codes for criminal and civil procedure date back to 1884. The legal system has employed a code-law legal system rather than a common law system such as the one used in the United States. Detailed and comprehensive, the codes leave little room for United Statesstyle judicial activism or citation of precedent. Legal reasoning is deductive (from the codes) , rather than inductive or based on past cases. 179

<strong>Dominican</strong> <strong>Republic</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Haiti</strong>: <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Studies</strong><br />

executive, interrogate members of the cabinet, <strong>and</strong> legislate on<br />

all matters not within the constitutional m<strong>and</strong>ate of other<br />

branches of government or contrary to the constitution. By a<br />

two-thirds vote of the full membership in each chamber, the<br />

Congress can also override a presidential veto of a law previously<br />

approved by simple majority.<br />

Historically, the <strong>Dominican</strong> Congress has been a weak, submissive<br />

branch. Its facilities, staffing, offices, <strong>and</strong> library have<br />

been woefully inadequate; in addition, the Court of Accounts,<br />

which examines the country's finances <strong>and</strong> reports to the Congress,<br />

has not provided complete or timely information. In the<br />

past several years, some modest steps toward improvement<br />

have been taken. Because the selection of c<strong>and</strong>idates to the<br />

party lists has been determined by party leaders, legislators<br />

have tended to be more responsive to these leaders than to voters.<br />

Turnover has been extremely high: from 1970 to 1998,<br />

only 18 percent of incumbent senators <strong>and</strong> only 17 percent of<br />

incumbent deputies were reelected to a subsequent term. The<br />

turnover has further encouraged legislative weakness <strong>and</strong> executive<br />

predominance. Many legislators have seen their position<br />

in Congress as temporarily providing them with an opportunity<br />

to focus on issues of personal <strong>and</strong> parochial gain, rather than<br />

on broader ideological or policy issues. The high turnover has<br />

also tended to discourage emphasis on building up the institution<br />

of the Congress itself. Finally, because the judicial branch<br />

until very recently has also tended to be extremely submissive<br />

to the executive branch, there has been little the legislature<br />

could actually do to prevent abuse of power by the president.<br />

This was especially the case with Balaguer, who governed the<br />

country with considerable discretion <strong>and</strong> little effective congressional<br />

oversight.<br />

Congress showed more independence during the PRE) governments<br />

of Antonio Guzman <strong>and</strong> Salvador Jorge Blanco<br />

between 1978 <strong>and</strong> 1986, <strong>and</strong> again under the PLD government<br />

of Leonel Fern<strong>and</strong>ez (1996-2000). In addition, during his<br />

1986-96 period in office, Balaguer was more limited in his ability<br />

to ignore or sidestep Congress than he had been during the<br />

1966-78 period when he had comfortable majorities in both<br />

chambers. Even the earlier Balaguer administrations occasionally<br />

confronted an obstructionist Congress, however. Indeed,<br />

the major power of Congress has been to obstruct <strong>and</strong> to<br />

delay—whether in the pursuit of personal or parochial gain,<br />

responding to the wishes of interest groups or other societal<br />

178

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!