19.06.2022 Views

Dominican Republic and Haiti: Country Studies

by Helen Chapin Metz et al

by Helen Chapin Metz et al

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC IN the late 1990s could be considered<br />

a political democracy, albeit one that remained fragile<br />

<strong>and</strong> uninstitutionalized. This chapter focuses on contemporary<br />

issues <strong>and</strong> patterns in the country's government <strong>and</strong> politics. It<br />

briefly reviews the emergence of democratic politics in the<br />

country, examines the country's system of government <strong>and</strong><br />

political institutions, analyzes the major political <strong>and</strong> socioeconomic<br />

actors, <strong>and</strong> discusses major issues in foreign relations.<br />

Three major themes are underscored. First, the discussion<br />

notes that various historical, socioeconomic, <strong>and</strong> international<br />

factors have been unfavorable to the development of democracy<br />

in the country, although dramatic changes have taken<br />

place over the past several decades. Second, this historical<br />

experience is crucial to underst<strong>and</strong>ing how the country's system<br />

of government comprises both formal rules (such as the<br />

constitution <strong>and</strong> elections) <strong>and</strong> informal norms often at variance<br />

with the formal rules. The formal rules have frequently<br />

been ignored, manipulated, or changed by political actors as<br />

part of the struggle for power. Informal norms regarding both<br />

the use of the state for personal power <strong>and</strong> accumulation of<br />

wealth <strong>and</strong> the invocation of formal rules have often been<br />

more important. Following Max Weber, we may say that these<br />

norms reflect patrimonial politics, where a ruler governs a<br />

country as if it were simply an extension of his household, thus<br />

blurring public purposes <strong>and</strong> private interests. Typically, this<br />

type of ruler seeks to reduce the autonomy of his followers<br />

through complex ties of dependence <strong>and</strong> loyalty commonly<br />

involving patronage <strong>and</strong> clientelist ties. The third theme is<br />

that, as a consequence, the struggle for political democracy in<br />

the country has been a struggle not only for greater respect for<br />

civil liberties <strong>and</strong> political rights of the population as a whole,<br />

but also for the construction of a more coherent <strong>and</strong> accountable<br />

set of state <strong>and</strong> political institutions, with greater respect<br />

for a democratic rule of law.<br />

Historical Legacies of Authoritarian Rule<br />

The <strong>Dominican</strong> <strong>Republic</strong> has had a tragic history particularly<br />

inimical to the development of democratic politics. This<br />

fact is evident in the country's Spanish colonial experience,<br />

161

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!