17.06.2022 Views

Origin: A Genetic History of the Americas

by Jennifer Raff

by Jennifer Raff

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The paper was immediately excoriated by o<strong>the</strong>r linguists.<br />

The root <strong>of</strong> Greenberg’s hypo<strong>the</strong>sis, and <strong>the</strong> reason why it was<br />

controversial, was not because he “discovered” a later migration<br />

<strong>of</strong> Arctic peoples using linguistic data; that was already well<br />

understood from Arctic peoples’ own oral histories,<br />

archaeological data, biological data, and linguistic data<br />

preceding Greenberg’s work. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, Greenberg’s hypo<strong>the</strong>sis<br />

was controversial because he grouped all o<strong>the</strong>r languages<br />

(besides those spoken by Athabaskans and Arctic peoples) into<br />

<strong>the</strong> Amerind category. In a famous critique, Johanna Nicols<br />

countered that <strong>the</strong> diversity among <strong>the</strong> languages grouped as<br />

“Amerind” would require something on <strong>the</strong> order <strong>of</strong> 35,000 years<br />

to develop, not <strong>the</strong> 12,000 years Greenberg assumed to fit <strong>the</strong><br />

Clovis First hypo<strong>the</strong>sis.<br />

The methods which he used to construct <strong>the</strong>se groupings<br />

were considered highly problematic by his colleagues.<br />

Greenberg did not distinguish between homology and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

factors that might cause words to resemble each o<strong>the</strong>r. This<br />

resulted, critics argued, in fundamental errors that were fatal to<br />

his classification scheme. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> alleged<br />

“correspondences” between linguistic, genetic, and<br />

morphological groupings broke down when it came to specifics:<br />

The so-called Greater Northwest Coast Group identified by<br />

dental traits did not correspond to <strong>the</strong> Na-Dene linguistic<br />

grouping—it included Inuit-Aleut speakers and o<strong>the</strong>r people who<br />

would have been classified as Amerind by Greenberg. The<br />

genetics data did not fit ei<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

Despite <strong>the</strong>se flaws, some geneticists eagerly adopted <strong>the</strong><br />

model. The three-wave migration hypo<strong>the</strong>sis became <strong>the</strong><br />

standard model that all genetics studies <strong>of</strong> peoples in <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Americas</strong> tested with new evidence for decades. Between 1987<br />

and 2004, 80 out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 100 papers published on genetic<br />

variation in Native American populations were influenced by (or<br />

mentioned) this model.<br />

Eventually, however, mitochondrial and Y chromosome DNA<br />

produced clear patterns that did not correspond to <strong>the</strong>se

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!