17.06.2022 Views

Origin: A Genetic History of the Americas

by Jennifer Raff

by Jennifer Raff

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ano<strong>the</strong>r major implication <strong>of</strong> polygenism was outlined by naturalist<br />

Jean Louis Rodolphe Agassiz, a contemporary <strong>of</strong> Morton’s. Agassiz<br />

postulated that different species were created in different regions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

world according to which climates were most suitable for <strong>the</strong>m, and thus<br />

did not—could not—move very far from <strong>the</strong>ir original homelands. The<br />

same was true, Agassiz argued, <strong>of</strong> humans: Each race was created<br />

individually and separately on its own continent, and migration was <strong>the</strong><br />

exception, not <strong>the</strong> norm, in human history.<br />

Therefore, understanding <strong>the</strong> origins <strong>of</strong> each race could help scientists<br />

understand <strong>the</strong> history <strong>of</strong> humanity. Morton himself was particularly<br />

interested in <strong>the</strong> racial origins <strong>of</strong> Indians. In his best-known work, a study<br />

<strong>of</strong> Native American morphology called Crania Americana (1839), Morton<br />

suggested that Native Americans were<br />

marked by a brown complexion, long, black, lank hair and deficient<br />

beard. The eyes are black and deep set, <strong>the</strong> brow low, <strong>the</strong> cheekbones<br />

high, <strong>the</strong> nose large and aquiline, <strong>the</strong> mouth large and <strong>the</strong> lips<br />

tumid [swollen] and compressed. The skull is small, wide between<br />

<strong>the</strong> parietal protuberances, prominent at <strong>the</strong> vertex, and flat on <strong>the</strong><br />

occiput. In <strong>the</strong>ir mental character <strong>the</strong> Americans are averse to<br />

cultivation, and slow in acquiring knowledge; restless, revengeful,<br />

and fond <strong>of</strong> war, and wholly destitute <strong>of</strong> maritime adventure (27).<br />

This description is remarkable to 21st-century readers for its bigotry, <strong>of</strong><br />

course, but also for its curious combination <strong>of</strong> physical and nonphysical<br />

traits. Today our folk classifications <strong>of</strong> races tend to be based mainly on<br />

physical features: skin color, hair color, <strong>the</strong> shape <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> eyes and nose.<br />

Terms like “averse to cultivation” sound very strange to a modern reader<br />

(although if you dive a bit deeper into <strong>the</strong> racist cesspool you will certainly<br />

still encounter claims about IQ and personalities and so forth).<br />

But to a 19th-century medical man with an anthropological bent, this<br />

blending <strong>of</strong> physical and nonphysical traits was central in understanding<br />

how humans were divided into races and how those races were ranked<br />

relative to each o<strong>the</strong>r. It became <strong>the</strong> central preoccupation <strong>of</strong> physical<br />

anthropology in <strong>the</strong> United States, a new discipline founded by a small

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!