17.06.2022 Views

Origin: A Genetic History of the Americas

by Jennifer Raff

by Jennifer Raff

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

North America when Europeans first arrived. It must have taken an<br />

extremely long time for <strong>the</strong> many thousands <strong>of</strong> “Indian” languages to have<br />

developed, Jefferson argued, and <strong>the</strong>y most plausibly came from nor<strong>the</strong>ast<br />

Asia. He even suggested a possible route for <strong>the</strong>ir origination:<br />

Again, <strong>the</strong> late discoveries <strong>of</strong> Captain Cook, coasting from<br />

Kamschatka to California, have proved that, if <strong>the</strong> two continents <strong>of</strong><br />

Asia and America be separated at all, it is only by a narrow streight.<br />

So that from this side also, inhabitants may have passed into<br />

America: and <strong>the</strong> resemblance between <strong>the</strong> Indians <strong>of</strong> America and<br />

<strong>the</strong> eastern inhabitants <strong>of</strong> Asia, would induce us to conjecture, that<br />

<strong>the</strong> former are <strong>the</strong> descendants <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> latter, or <strong>the</strong> latter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

former: excepting indeed <strong>the</strong> Eskimaux, who, from <strong>the</strong> same<br />

circumstance <strong>of</strong> resemblance and from identity <strong>of</strong> language, must be<br />

derived from <strong>the</strong> Groenlanders, and <strong>the</strong>se probably from some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

nor<strong>the</strong>rn parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> old continent (12).<br />

Despite Jefferson’s impressive accumulation <strong>of</strong> evidence, it would be a<br />

century before this idea was accepted by <strong>the</strong> scientific community. By <strong>the</strong><br />

18th century, <strong>the</strong> Mound Builder hypo<strong>the</strong>sis had become firmly entrenched<br />

in public opinion as <strong>the</strong> leading explanation <strong>of</strong> North American prehistory<br />

(13). Scholars and antiquarians continued to debate <strong>the</strong> identity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Mound Builders into <strong>the</strong> 19th century, with <strong>the</strong> majority agreeing that <strong>the</strong>y<br />

were not <strong>the</strong> ancestors <strong>of</strong> Native Americans. President Andrew Jackson<br />

explicitly cited this hypo<strong>the</strong>sis as partial justification for <strong>the</strong> Indian<br />

Removal Act <strong>of</strong> 1830, barely 40 years after Jefferson published his book.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> monuments and fortresses <strong>of</strong> an unknown people, spread over<br />

<strong>the</strong> extensive regions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> west, we behold <strong>the</strong> memorials <strong>of</strong> a once<br />

powerful race, which was exterminated, or has disappeared, to make<br />

room for <strong>the</strong> existing savage tribes (14).<br />

Thus did <strong>the</strong> idea <strong>of</strong> Manifest Destiny become inexorably linked with<br />

concepts <strong>of</strong> racial categories. When someone asks me why I get so incensed<br />

about <strong>the</strong> concepts <strong>of</strong> “lost civilizations” and “Mound Builders” that are

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!