17.06.2022 Views

Origin: A Genetic History of the Americas

by Jennifer Raff

by Jennifer Raff

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

history.<br />

The movement out <strong>of</strong> Beringia seems as clear to us today as <strong>the</strong><br />

movement out <strong>of</strong> Africa, <strong>the</strong> peopling <strong>of</strong> Australia, or <strong>the</strong> multiple<br />

migrations <strong>of</strong> people into Europe. But when we look back through <strong>the</strong><br />

millennia <strong>of</strong> human history with knowledge that <strong>the</strong>se journeys happened,<br />

we can’t help but be influenced by bias: It had to happen this way because<br />

this is how it happened. We draw great arrows on maps, confidently<br />

pointing southward; we only need to collect some more genomes and do<br />

some more analyses in order to fill in <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> details.<br />

But this perspective is a foolish one. It erases <strong>the</strong> reality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> actual<br />

history. <strong>History</strong> is a far messier process, a complicated network <strong>of</strong><br />

individual choices driven by both <strong>the</strong> desire for exploration and <strong>the</strong><br />

necessities <strong>of</strong> survival. Only from <strong>the</strong> great distance afforded to us by<br />

13,000 years or more <strong>of</strong> elapsed time can we see an entire movement <strong>of</strong><br />

peoples as an arrow on a map.<br />

For many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> descendants <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se ancient travelers, <strong>the</strong> detached<br />

assuredness we (non-Native) researchers try to maintain is precisely <strong>the</strong><br />

problem. The disconnected view <strong>of</strong> ancient human remains as simply part<br />

<strong>of</strong> natural history, like <strong>the</strong> fossils <strong>of</strong> extinct trilobites—<strong>the</strong> legacy <strong>of</strong><br />

Thomas Jefferson and <strong>the</strong> scientists that followed him—underpins <strong>the</strong><br />

history <strong>of</strong> genetics and anthropology.<br />

But when scientists turn our lens onto our own history, we are forced to<br />

examine ugly things: science used to justify racism, insensitivity in <strong>the</strong><br />

pursuit <strong>of</strong> high-impact publications, and atrocities committed in <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong><br />

research.<br />

We who work in this field cannot erase our past mistakes—and many <strong>of</strong><br />

us, myself included, have done research in <strong>the</strong> past using approaches that<br />

we now recognize as wrong. We must acknowledge this, as well as <strong>the</strong> fact<br />

that we have benefited from an unjust system. Only <strong>the</strong>n can we<br />

conscientiously address our practices so that our quest to understand ancient<br />

humanity helps us maintain our own. In doing so, we must be cognizant <strong>of</strong><br />

what we are asking for from Indigenous peoples when we design our<br />

research.<br />

We are asking for <strong>the</strong>ir DNA, which is <strong>of</strong>ten considered sacred.<br />

We must consciously ask ourselves, Am I treating <strong>the</strong> DNA as sacred?<br />

We are asking for trust from people whose trust has been violated all too

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!