17.06.2022 Views

Origin: A Genetic History of the Americas

by Jennifer Raff

by Jennifer Raff

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

focus on regions where consent is more clear-cut or easier to obtain.<br />

This situation is not going to be resolved by expectations (or demands)<br />

for tribes to give scientists more genomes; one doesn’t build trust that way.<br />

And yet, Krystal Tsosie, a Navajo (Diné) geneticist and bioethicist, told me<br />

that she attended a conference in early 2019 where a researcher asked her,<br />

quite seriously, “What’s <strong>the</strong> magic formula for recruiting Native American<br />

participants?” v O<strong>the</strong>rs have joked to her about <strong>the</strong>ir extensive Native DNA<br />

biobanks collected in <strong>the</strong> past, before tribes had put into place restrictions.<br />

She sees attitudes like <strong>the</strong>se and many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> examples discussed above as<br />

unified by a common <strong>the</strong>me: <strong>the</strong> presumption that <strong>the</strong> research enterprise’s<br />

outcomes justify <strong>the</strong> means by which samples are obtained. “There’s just<br />

this sense <strong>of</strong> white ownership <strong>of</strong> our Indigenous biological samples,” she<br />

told me. “In some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> more recent controversies you see non-Indigenous<br />

researchers enter into Indigenous spaces. They collect samples and have<br />

complete stewardship over <strong>the</strong>m, using <strong>the</strong>m for whatever <strong>the</strong>y deem<br />

appropriate,” ra<strong>the</strong>r than working with tribes <strong>the</strong>mselves to determine how<br />

<strong>the</strong>y should be used.<br />

Historically, <strong>the</strong>re has been a decided lack <strong>of</strong> benefits to Indigenous<br />

groups that have participated in genetics studies. Criticisms <strong>of</strong> open-access<br />

genomic data have cited this—among o<strong>the</strong>r concerns discussed in this<br />

chapter—as a reason for <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> tribal participation in genomics studies.<br />

There have been number <strong>of</strong> initiatives, such as Indigenous-led biobanks and<br />

data repositories like <strong>the</strong> Native BioData Consortium that prioritize active,<br />

ongoing consultation with participants, that show great promise for<br />

improving <strong>the</strong> balance <strong>of</strong> power and benefits between researchers and<br />

communities (33).<br />

Pathways Forward<br />

Results from genetics research can have powerful consequences for<br />

Indigenous communities, both beneficial and detrimental. Scientific<br />

research that uses human DNA doesn’t take place in a vacuum. <strong>Genetic</strong>s<br />

studies can be used to argue against tribal histories, potentially threaten<br />

sovereignty, or dispute cultural identities. They can be used in ways that<br />

benefit outside researchers at <strong>the</strong> expense <strong>of</strong> tribal members and potentially

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!