17.06.2022 Views

Origin: A Genetic History of the Americas

by Jennifer Raff

by Jennifer Raff

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figuring out how that finding fits with genetic evidence is a new puzzle to<br />

solve. But I think that while we exercise a healthy skepticism, we must<br />

learn our lessons from <strong>the</strong> erroneous Clovis First paradigm and not simply<br />

dismiss evidence because it doesn’t fit with a model we happen to favor<br />

(49)—we shouldn’t simply replace Clovis First with a similarly dogmatic<br />

upper limit. All scientists must hold <strong>the</strong>mselves open to <strong>the</strong> possibility that<br />

we could be wrong, and it may very well be that in 5, 10, or 20 years, this<br />

book will be as out <strong>of</strong> date as any o<strong>the</strong>r. That possibility is what makes<br />

working in this field so rewarding.<br />

Footnotes<br />

i In both <strong>the</strong> television series and <strong>the</strong> book A Song <strong>of</strong> Ice and Fire, <strong>the</strong> Wall<br />

is described as being almost 700 feet high.<br />

ii Archaeologists David Kilby and J. M. Adovasio have both confirmed my<br />

impression that <strong>the</strong> archaeological literature up until <strong>the</strong> 1990s recognized<br />

women as having been around, but <strong>the</strong>y didn’t really get discussed or<br />

considered as part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory because <strong>the</strong>y obviously nei<strong>the</strong>r made nor<br />

used stone tools. Nuanced discussions <strong>of</strong> women in <strong>the</strong> past became more<br />

common beginning in <strong>the</strong> 1990s. O<strong>the</strong>r archaeologists I have spoken with<br />

dispute that women were omitted from study, but <strong>the</strong>y were just not<br />

specifically studied.<br />

iii I dislike both <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se terms, but <strong>the</strong>y are <strong>the</strong> ones historically used by<br />

archaeologists to describe this period.<br />

iv They described <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>sis that humans had caused <strong>the</strong> extinction <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> giant Pleistocene beasts as <strong>the</strong> Overkill hypo<strong>the</strong>sis. It’s not necessarily a<br />

part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Clovis First hypo<strong>the</strong>sis, but it has become associated with <strong>the</strong><br />

interior route because it fit with <strong>the</strong> idea <strong>of</strong> a wave <strong>of</strong> big-game hunters<br />

moving swiftly across <strong>the</strong> landscape. This hypo<strong>the</strong>sis, first proposed by<br />

Paul Martin in 1973, is still hotly debated; many archaeologists and<br />

paleoecologists argue that <strong>the</strong> changing climate at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pleistocene<br />

was more <strong>of</strong> a factor in <strong>the</strong> extinction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> megafauna, and that <strong>the</strong><br />

archaeological record shows only some megafauna were hunted by humans,<br />

not all. To this argument some add <strong>the</strong> critique that ancient Native<br />

American hunter-ga<strong>the</strong>rers were far more responsible hunters and stewards

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!