4 °C - the National Sea Grant Library
4 °C - the National Sea Grant Library 4 °C - the National Sea Grant Library
BACKGROUND A Rapid, Easily Used Test Kit To Determine Histamine Concentrations in Fish Brinton M. Miller, Chari G. Johnson, and David J. Ledden Neogen Corporation Lansing, Michigan 48912 Recently the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced it was improving its histamine policy in the revised Compliance Policy Guide 7108.24 Decomposition and Histamine “Raw, Frozen Tuna and Mahi-Mahi; Camred Tuna; and Related Species” (Fed. Reg. v. 601149, August 3, 1995; pp. 39754-39756). In summary the FDA: . lowered the Defect Action Level (DAL) to 50 ppm for decomposition. . eliminated the requirement that findings of < 200 ppm had to be confirmed by organoleptic tests [i.e., histamine determination alone is sufficient]. � application of the revised DAL applies to raw and frozen tuna and mahi-mahi; and furthermore, on a case-by-case basis histamine levels r 50 ppm to < 500 ppm may be used as evidence of decomposition in other species. � the Action Level (AL) of 500 ppm will apply to species of fish that have been implicated in histamine poisoning outbreaks. The FDA notice calls our attention to the fact that ”. ..nonvolatile spoilage compounds such as histamine remain in the product (the fish) and can be determined reliably by chemical analysis.” The most commonly used method for histamine determination is AOAC Official Method 977.13-the fluorometric method, which received Final Action approval in 1987. This method has three phases: First - extraction of histamine from it matrix (fish). This phase consists of a methanol extraction of histamine from (blended) fish followed by heating (60 “C) and filtrations (Fig. 1). 9 - purification of the histamine ftom the “extract.” This phase involves ion exchange chromatography whereby histamine passes through the column but interferences, such as histidine and other free amino acids are retained.
Third - detection of histamine in the column effluent. This phase involves adjusting the sample to alkaline pH, reaction with OPT (o-phthalic dicarboxaldehyde a.k.a. OPA), sample neutralization followed by fluorescent detection ( 1 ex = 350 nm and J, em = 444 nm) (Fig. 2). Quantitative histamine concentrations are determined by comparing sample fluorescence values to a standard curve generated daily or more often. Standards are prepared in a fashion that they are subjected only to the detection phase of the method. THE NEW “OLD” ASSAY Our assay utilizes an AOAC approved chemical method (spectrophotometric) in a new, userfriendly format. The first phase, the extraction procedure is identical to the fluorometric AOAC method. The second phase uses an anionic exchange resin to remove interfering substances only in a batch-wise fashion by means of a simple filtration device. The filtrate is pH adjusted by means of dilution and a 100 PL aliquot is added to a detector cup. Then, captured histamine is reacted with diazotized p-nitroaniline (previously activated by reacting sodium nitrite in a crushable ampoule within a tube of p&roan&e). The reflectance value of the reaction product (d&o dye), which is reddish colored, is measured in a simple reflectometer, the AgriMeter (Fig. 3,4). Table 1 shows the reflectance ranges for important levels of histamine including the Defect Action Level of 50 ppm. Figure 5 shows a standard curve with error bars derived from values like those in Table 1. Figure 6 is a “scattergram” comparing the fluorometric AOAC method values for 85 samples of canned and fresh fi-ozen tuna to the ranges of the Alert” for Histamine test with these same samples. Please note the single high sample (ca. 53 ppm) in the > 5 < 19 range. Upon examination, that particular sample was found to have a high salt content. Figure 7 shows the effects of salt on the Alert assay; i.e. at > 2.0 % (w/w) salt a standard curve is changed markedly. However, canned tuna should have I, 1 .O% salt, a specification that is determined separately in Good Manufacturing Practices (QA) procedures. Table 2 lists histamine levels in nine samples of fresh/frozen mahi-mahi as determined by the AOAC fluorometric method and the Alert for Histamine test both of which used standard curves. The classification column was the conclusion drawn by the technologist conducting the test. It should be noted that extractions with 75% methanol were used.
- Page 200 and 201: .z%M 5 =w B 14 29 39 4142 53 64 25
- Page 202 and 203: .s CM 8 C s-t B W S' a .g CM $ C .-
- Page 204 and 205: Marshall, G.A. Moody, M.W., Hackney
- Page 206 and 207: AN OVERVIEW OF THE NMFS PRODUCT QUA
- Page 208 and 209: STORAGE CHARACTERISTICS OF FROZEN B
- Page 210 and 211: OPTIMUM CONDITIONS FOR THE PREPARAT
- Page 212 and 213: 3 BUILDING STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS F
- Page 214 and 215: for aquaculture supporting developm
- Page 216 and 217: problem solving of complex regional
- Page 218 and 219: DESIGN OF AN AUTOMAT EVALUATION DEV
- Page 220 and 221: sides of the shrimp were averaged.
- Page 222 and 223: Ammonia Measurements Figure 2 shows
- Page 224 and 225: REFERENCES Balaban, M. O., Yeralan,
- Page 226 and 227: QUALITIES OF FRESH AND PREVIOUSLY F
- Page 228 and 229: For the samples stored for six mont
- Page 230 and 231: stored for six month, had lower bac
- Page 232 and 233: Table 1. Psychrotrophic bacterial p
- Page 234 and 235: Table 7. Juiciness of refrigerated
- Page 236 and 237: Table 12. Cohesiveness of baked ref
- Page 238 and 239: Table 16. Shear force and centrifti
- Page 240 and 241: SAS Institute Inc. 1987. “SAS/STA
- Page 242 and 243: with a color chart. In this paper,
- Page 244 and 245: TABLE 1 Comparison of Histamine Tes
- Page 246 and 247: 11, Chassande, O., Renard, S., Barb
- Page 248 and 249: FIGURE 1 Time Course for Histamine
- Page 252 and 253: We acknowledge with thanks the inte
- Page 254 and 255: AOAC Add 1 ml Extract to 8 cm Prepa
- Page 256 and 257: 248 . Fig. 4 pnitroaniline in HCl N
- Page 258 and 259: 1 O .’ REFLECTANCE (arbitrary uni
- Page 260 and 261: 552 650 600 Salt Effects in the Fig
- Page 262 and 263: IMMUNOLOGIC APPROACHES TO THE IDENT
- Page 264 and 265: Table 1. Fish collected in Biscayne
- Page 266 and 267: Based on unpublished data comparing
- Page 268 and 269: 2. 3. 4. Hartmann, J.X., Poyer, J.C
- Page 270 and 271: irradiated foods look like. After t
- Page 272 and 273: silver carp Wpophthalmichthys molit
- Page 274 and 275: ,$mory Analysis. Sensory data were
- Page 276 and 277: Table 3. Percentage of panelists wh
- Page 278 and 279: Table 5. Percent response of paneli
- Page 280 and 281: McNulty, T, 1996. Personal communic
- Page 282 and 283: in a stainless steel tank (SOL) wit
- Page 284 and 285: Mineral Content Five macro-elements
- Page 286 and 287: TBble 1 _ Yield of surimi made from
- Page 288 and 289: Table 4 - Proximate composition of
- Page 290 and 291: goatfish lizardfish, ponyfish, ther
- Page 292 and 293: Table 7 - Amino acid composition of
- Page 294 and 295: Gel Strength For surimi gels, stres
- Page 296 and 297: 288 &f&odan, Y., Toyohara, H., and
- Page 298 and 299: CONSUMER SURVEY OF POND RAISED CATF
Third - detection of histamine in <strong>the</strong> column effluent. This phase involves adjusting <strong>the</strong><br />
sample to alkaline pH, reaction with OPT (o-phthalic dicarboxaldehyde a.k.a. OPA), sample<br />
neutralization followed by fluorescent detection ( 1 ex = 350 nm and J, em = 444 nm) (Fig.<br />
2).<br />
Quantitative histamine concentrations are determined by comparing sample fluorescence<br />
values to a standard curve generated daily or more often. Standards are prepared in a fashion that<br />
<strong>the</strong>y are subjected only to <strong>the</strong> detection phase of <strong>the</strong> method.<br />
THE NEW “OLD” ASSAY<br />
Our assay utilizes an AOAC approved chemical method (spectrophotometric) in a new, userfriendly<br />
format. The first phase, <strong>the</strong> extraction procedure is identical to <strong>the</strong> fluorometric AOAC<br />
method.<br />
The second phase uses an anionic exchange resin to remove interfering substances only in<br />
a batch-wise fashion by means of a simple filtration device. The filtrate is pH adjusted by means<br />
of dilution and a 100 PL aliquot is added to a detector cup. Then, captured histamine is reacted with<br />
diazotized p-nitroaniline (previously activated by reacting sodium nitrite in a crushable ampoule<br />
within a tube of p&roan&e). The reflectance value of <strong>the</strong> reaction product (d&o dye), which is<br />
reddish colored, is measured in a simple reflectometer, <strong>the</strong> AgriMeter (Fig. 3,4).<br />
Table 1 shows <strong>the</strong> reflectance ranges for important levels of histamine including <strong>the</strong> Defect<br />
Action Level of 50 ppm.<br />
Figure 5 shows a standard curve with error bars derived from values like those in Table 1.<br />
Figure 6 is a “scattergram” comparing <strong>the</strong> fluorometric AOAC method values for 85 samples<br />
of canned and fresh fi-ozen tuna to <strong>the</strong> ranges of <strong>the</strong> Alert” for Histamine test with <strong>the</strong>se same<br />
samples. Please note <strong>the</strong> single high sample (ca. 53 ppm) in <strong>the</strong> > 5 < 19 range. Upon examination,<br />
that particular sample was found to have a high salt content.<br />
Figure 7 shows <strong>the</strong> effects of salt on <strong>the</strong> Alert assay; i.e. at > 2.0 % (w/w) salt a standard<br />
curve is changed markedly. However, canned tuna should have I, 1 .O% salt, a specification that is<br />
determined separately in Good Manufacturing Practices (QA) procedures.<br />
Table 2 lists histamine levels in nine samples of fresh/frozen mahi-mahi as determined by<br />
<strong>the</strong> AOAC fluorometric method and <strong>the</strong> Alert for Histamine test both of which used standard curves.<br />
The classification column was <strong>the</strong> conclusion drawn by <strong>the</strong> technologist conducting <strong>the</strong> test. It<br />
should be noted that extractions with 75% methanol were used.