4 °C - the National Sea Grant Library
4 °C - the National Sea Grant Library 4 °C - the National Sea Grant Library
with a color chart. In this paper, we report the production of a dry chemistry test (dipstick) for histamine in tuna. MATERIALS Pig kidneys were obtained from Cascio’s Abatoir (Hattiesburg, MS) and used immediately or frozen at -20°C until use. Bluefin tuna loins were obtained on ice within 24 hrs of harvest from the Gulf of Mexico by J&R Seafood (Hattiesburg, MS). All tuna samples were stored at -80°C until use. Serim Peroxide Reagent Strips were obtained from Serim Research Corporation (Elkhart, IN). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (2000 U/ml) was obtained from Sigma Chemical Company (St. Louis, MO). Histidine, putrescine, cadaverme, and histamine dihydrochlorides were obtained from Sigma Chemical Company. Stabilcoatm was obtained from Biometric Systems, Inc. (Eden Prairie, MN). METHODS me Purification Diamine oxidase (DAO) was purified through the hydroxylapatite step of Rinaldi (9) with the following modifications: potassium phosphate buffer (O.lM, pH 6.5) was used throughout, and entire defatted pig kidneys were used. The final active fractions were pooled, concentrated using 70% ammonium sulfate, redissolved and dialyzed against potassium phosphate buffer. The specific activity of the final preparation was comparable to that found by Rinaldi (1-2 U/mg protein). The following reagents were mixed on ice: 2.5 ml HRP (2000 U/ml>, 2.5 ml Stabilcoat, and 5.0 ml of DA0 (152.5 U/ml). Serim Peroxide Reagent Strips were dipped in this mixture, dried at 37OC for 30 minutes, and stored in a desiccator at room temperature. This produced a lot of approximately 750 dipsticks with the same activity. *aratiOn of Decomnosed Tuna Fresh tuna on ice was cut into approximately 100 g chunks and portioned into plastic freezer bags. Control samples were frozen immediately at -20°C. Test samples were maintained at 8°C and aerated every 48 hrs by opening the bags and allowing the air to exchange, then resealing the bags. Samples were removed after various time intervals, split into equal portions, and frozen at -2OOC. Subsequently, one portion was thawed and tested for histamine using the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) reference method (10). The other portion was thawed and homogenized in 2 volumes of potassium phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 6.5) for 2 minutes, centrifuged, heated at 75°C for 1 min to decolhe, and clarified by brief centrifugation. The supematant was then tested with the histamine dipsticks and the modified AOAC fluorometric test (4). Histamine Determination To determine the histamine concentration, dipsticks were immersed briefly in samples to be tested ad then observed visually. Color was allowed to develop for 10 minutes unless otherwise stated I) and the reflectance was determined at 660 nm. A standard cuke was
performed with each experiment using fresh tuna extract (zero histamine tuna) spiked with known concentrations (0-l.0 mM) of histamine, and the concentrations of the unknown samples were determined using this curve. Samples with elevated concentrations of histamine were diluted in fresh tuna extract and reassayed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Dipstick Assav A time course was performed using histamine (0.8 mM) spiked into buffer, fresh tuna extract, and heat-treated tuna extract (heated at 75°C for 1 mm), in order to determine the optimal duration for the dipstick assay (Fig 1). At 10 min there was maximal reproducible color development and therefore this time was selected as the assay time. To determine the sensitivity of the assay, 20 samples of fresh tuna were analyzed and the mean plus two standard deviations calculated. The minimum detectable concentration for the assay, i.e. the threshold level distinguishable above random noise, was thus observed to be 0.07 mM. (One mg% corresponds to 0.03 mM.) The linearity of the assay was- determined using fresh tuna spiked with varying concentrations of histamine. To illustrate reproducibility, figure 2 shows the means (and their standard errors) of data obtained from three separate experiments and two lots of dipsticks (n= 6). For an individual experiment using a single lot of dipsticks the assay was found to be linear up to 1.0 mM, with a correlation coefficient of 0.994. This was repeated substituting potassium phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 6.5) for the fresh tuna. Using the bufferbased calibrators, the assay was found to be linear to 5 mM. To determine the extent of interference from other diamines, putrescine and cadaverine were analyzed in parallel with histamine (Fig 3). Cadaverine did not react with the dipstick whereas putrescine gave some response at 10 fold higher concentrations. Similarly, histidine did not react with the assay (Fig 3). In order to test the longevity of the dipsticks, four out of sixteen different lots of dipsticks-stored desiccated at room temperature were tested weekly with histamine (0.1 to 1.0 mM). All lots of dipsticks were stable (average 70% of initial color response) for at least 2 months. The longest lot tested was stable for 4 months (87% of initial color response). Although not quantitated, it was clear that both response and stability was increased with increased specific activity of the diamine oxidase preparation. Method Comparison Samples of tuna in various stages of decomposition were split and assayed by the dipstick test, the AOAC reference method, and a modified flurometric procedure based on the AOAC method. The results and the corresponding standard deviations are presented below.
- Page 191 and 192: Anonymous. 1992. Processing up 11%
- Page 193 and 194: Sin&_&x, R. O. and Yu, T. C. 1958.
- Page 195 and 196: 1. Materials MATERIALS AND METHODS
- Page 197: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Aroma profil
- Page 200 and 201: .z%M 5 =w B 14 29 39 4142 53 64 25
- Page 202 and 203: .s CM 8 C s-t B W S' a .g CM $ C .-
- Page 204 and 205: Marshall, G.A. Moody, M.W., Hackney
- Page 206 and 207: AN OVERVIEW OF THE NMFS PRODUCT QUA
- Page 208 and 209: STORAGE CHARACTERISTICS OF FROZEN B
- Page 210 and 211: OPTIMUM CONDITIONS FOR THE PREPARAT
- Page 212 and 213: 3 BUILDING STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS F
- Page 214 and 215: for aquaculture supporting developm
- Page 216 and 217: problem solving of complex regional
- Page 218 and 219: DESIGN OF AN AUTOMAT EVALUATION DEV
- Page 220 and 221: sides of the shrimp were averaged.
- Page 222 and 223: Ammonia Measurements Figure 2 shows
- Page 224 and 225: REFERENCES Balaban, M. O., Yeralan,
- Page 226 and 227: QUALITIES OF FRESH AND PREVIOUSLY F
- Page 228 and 229: For the samples stored for six mont
- Page 230 and 231: stored for six month, had lower bac
- Page 232 and 233: Table 1. Psychrotrophic bacterial p
- Page 234 and 235: Table 7. Juiciness of refrigerated
- Page 236 and 237: Table 12. Cohesiveness of baked ref
- Page 238 and 239: Table 16. Shear force and centrifti
- Page 240 and 241: SAS Institute Inc. 1987. “SAS/STA
- Page 244 and 245: TABLE 1 Comparison of Histamine Tes
- Page 246 and 247: 11, Chassande, O., Renard, S., Barb
- Page 248 and 249: FIGURE 1 Time Course for Histamine
- Page 250 and 251: BACKGROUND A Rapid, Easily Used Tes
- Page 252 and 253: We acknowledge with thanks the inte
- Page 254 and 255: AOAC Add 1 ml Extract to 8 cm Prepa
- Page 256 and 257: 248 . Fig. 4 pnitroaniline in HCl N
- Page 258 and 259: 1 O .’ REFLECTANCE (arbitrary uni
- Page 260 and 261: 552 650 600 Salt Effects in the Fig
- Page 262 and 263: IMMUNOLOGIC APPROACHES TO THE IDENT
- Page 264 and 265: Table 1. Fish collected in Biscayne
- Page 266 and 267: Based on unpublished data comparing
- Page 268 and 269: 2. 3. 4. Hartmann, J.X., Poyer, J.C
- Page 270 and 271: irradiated foods look like. After t
- Page 272 and 273: silver carp Wpophthalmichthys molit
- Page 274 and 275: ,$mory Analysis. Sensory data were
- Page 276 and 277: Table 3. Percentage of panelists wh
- Page 278 and 279: Table 5. Percent response of paneli
- Page 280 and 281: McNulty, T, 1996. Personal communic
- Page 282 and 283: in a stainless steel tank (SOL) wit
- Page 284 and 285: Mineral Content Five macro-elements
- Page 286 and 287: TBble 1 _ Yield of surimi made from
- Page 288 and 289: Table 4 - Proximate composition of
- Page 290 and 291: goatfish lizardfish, ponyfish, ther
with a color chart. In this paper, we report <strong>the</strong> production of a dry chemistry test (dipstick)<br />
for histamine in tuna.<br />
MATERIALS<br />
Pig kidneys were obtained from Cascio’s Abatoir (Hattiesburg, MS) and used<br />
immediately or frozen at -20<strong>°C</strong> until use. Bluefin tuna loins were obtained on ice within 24<br />
hrs of harvest from <strong>the</strong> Gulf of Mexico by J&R <strong>Sea</strong>food (Hattiesburg, MS). All tuna<br />
samples were stored at -80<strong>°C</strong> until use. Serim Peroxide Reagent Strips were obtained from<br />
Serim Research Corporation (Elkhart, IN). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (2000 U/ml) was<br />
obtained from Sigma Chemical Company (St. Louis, MO). Histidine, putrescine, cadaverme,<br />
and histamine dihydrochlorides were obtained from Sigma Chemical Company. Stabilcoatm<br />
was obtained from Biometric Systems, Inc. (Eden Prairie, MN).<br />
METHODS<br />
me Purification<br />
Diamine oxidase (DAO) was purified through <strong>the</strong> hydroxylapatite step of Rinaldi (9)<br />
with <strong>the</strong> following modifications: potassium phosphate buffer (O.lM, pH 6.5) was used<br />
throughout, and entire defatted pig kidneys were used. The final active fractions were<br />
pooled, concentrated using 70% ammonium sulfate, redissolved and dialyzed against<br />
potassium phosphate buffer. The specific activity of <strong>the</strong> final preparation was comparable<br />
to that found by Rinaldi (1-2 U/mg protein).<br />
The following reagents were mixed on ice: 2.5 ml HRP (2000 U/ml>, 2.5 ml<br />
Stabilcoat, and 5.0 ml of DA0 (152.5 U/ml). Serim Peroxide Reagent Strips were dipped<br />
in this mixture, dried at 37OC for 30 minutes, and stored in a desiccator at room<br />
temperature. This produced a lot of approximately 750 dipsticks with <strong>the</strong> same activity.<br />
*aratiOn of Decomnosed Tuna<br />
Fresh tuna on ice was cut into approximately 100 g chunks and portioned into plastic<br />
freezer bags. Control samples were frozen immediately at -20<strong>°C</strong>. Test samples were<br />
maintained at 8<strong>°C</strong> and aerated every 48 hrs by opening <strong>the</strong> bags and allowing <strong>the</strong> air to<br />
exchange, <strong>the</strong>n resealing <strong>the</strong> bags. Samples were removed after various time intervals, split<br />
into equal portions, and frozen at -2OOC. Subsequently, one portion was thawed and tested<br />
for histamine using <strong>the</strong> Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) reference<br />
method (10). The o<strong>the</strong>r portion was thawed and homogenized in 2 volumes of potassium<br />
phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 6.5) for 2 minutes, centrifuged, heated at 75<strong>°C</strong> for 1 min to<br />
decolhe, and clarified by brief centrifugation. The supematant was <strong>the</strong>n tested with <strong>the</strong><br />
histamine dipsticks and <strong>the</strong> modified AOAC fluorometric test (4).<br />
Histamine Determination<br />
To determine <strong>the</strong> histamine concentration, dipsticks were immersed briefly in samples<br />
to be tested ad <strong>the</strong>n observed visually. Color was allowed to develop for 10 minutes unless<br />
o<strong>the</strong>rwise stated I) and <strong>the</strong> reflectance was determined at 660 nm. A standard cuke was