4 °C - the National Sea Grant Library
4 °C - the National Sea Grant Library 4 °C - the National Sea Grant Library
AN OVERVIEW OF THE NMFS PRODUCT QUAL TU PR Michael L. Jahncke, E. Spencer Garrett, and John M. Tennyson NMFS National Seafood Inspection Laboratory PO Drawer 1207 Pascagoula, MS 39568 NMFS has four major laboratories concerned with seafood product quality and safety. These facilities are located in Gloucester, MA, Charleston, SC, Pascagoula, MS and Seattle, WA. With the exception of the NSIL facility in Pascagoula, MS which is solely dedicated to the National NMFS Inspection Program, the other facilities are fully integrated in the NMFS Fishery System of Habitat Protection, Environmental Contaminant Monitoring, Biotoxins, New Methods Development;Population Dynamics, and Aquaculture. Such Product Quality and Safety Laboratories bring an integrated fishery system approach to consumer protection and serve as available resource base to NSIL and the NMFS Inspection Program. The programs of each facility are integrated into supporting seafood inspection needs. To insure program integration, a National Seafood Product Quality and Safety “Tiger Team” coordinating is composed of each Product Quality and Safety Laboratory Director and the Directors of the Environmental Conservation Division and Inspection Services Division. The purpose of the “Tiger Team” is to annually plan, update, and implement a coordinated program of scientific research and services to meet both short and long term needs to the NMFS Inspection Program. All NSIL activities are integrated into this Product Quality Safety fishery support system. An overview of this program will be presented. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE AQUACULTURE RESEARCH PLANS Thomas C. Siewicki NMFS PO Box 12607 Charleston, SC 29412-0607 The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) is preparing plans for new research on marine aquaculture at both the national and southern regional levels. Increases in research are dependent upon policy decisions and allocation of resources by the Agency. Within the region, impediment to aquaculture development have been identified by three mechanisms: (1) review on recently published analyses of the industry; (2) informal discussions with researchers and entrepreneurs in all southeastern states and the U.S. Caribbean; and (3) a workshop that included representatives from throughout the region covering a broad range of technical disciplines and experiences. Workshop participants described a progressive industry and identified major obstacles to full realization of industry goals within ten years. Recommendations for NMFS involvement have been prepared that consider priority needs for the industry, the strengths and mission of the Agency, and close coordination with other agencies and industry.
CENT C GES IN OYSTER CONSUMPTION AMONG FLORIDA RESIDENTS Charles M. Adams and Robert L. Degner Univ. of Florida & FL Sea Grant College Program Gainesville, FL 32611 A telephone survey was conducted during May and June of 1994 to determine current consumption levels of oysters and to ascertain changes in consumption behavior. The survey included 1,012 adults in seven metropolitan areas in north and central Florida. The study documents a continuing erosion of public confidence in the safety of oysters, largely fueled by adverse media publicity and consumption advisory notices. EVALUATION OF ON-BOARD HANDLING TECHNIQUES ON THE QUALITY OF VARIOUS COASTAL HERRING SPECIES Janet A. Gooch’, Michael Jahncke*, Benedict C. Posadas3 and C. David Veal3 1 National Marine Fisheries Service ZNational Marine Fisheries Service MSU/NMFS Experimental Seafood Processing Lab National Seafood Inspection Lab 3411 Frederic Street 3209 Frederic Street Pascagoula, MS 39567 Pascagoula, MS 39567 3 Mississippi State University Coastal Research and Extension Center 2710 Beach Blvd., Suite 1E Biloxi, MS 39531 The Gulf of Mexico contains one of the two major latent fishery resources in the U.S. This resource includes many species of fish which are small in size and have not been readily accessible by traditional fish locating and harvesting methods. As a result, very little information is available concerning proper methods to handle, hold, and process these fish. Information is also lacking on the effect of season and capture site on yield, sensory characteristics, proximate and fatty acid compositions. Data are presented on the effects of on-board storage on the quality of rough scad stored in ice, refrigerated seawater (RSW), or a 3% salt-ice mixture.The results of proximate, chemical and fatty acid analyses are also shown for rough scad, round scad, chub mackerel, silver rag, round herring, and harvest fish that were collected during two different seasons over a three-year period. This information supports development of expanded fisheries and valueadded products utilizing the coastal herrings and associated species complex.
- Page 156 and 157: work on combining acetates and phos
- Page 158 and 159: untreated fresh fillets and treated
- Page 160 and 161: Fig. 3. 10 0 m control tJ 0.1% MKP-
- Page 162 and 163: negative bacteria such as Pseudomon
- Page 164 and 165: concentrations up to 1% could be us
- Page 166 and 167: Fey, M.S., and Regenstein, J.M. 198
- Page 168 and 169: Schaack, M.M., and Marth E.H. 1988.
- Page 170 and 171: MATERIALS AND METHODS Materials Liv
- Page 172 and 173: . , FIGURE 1. ANAEROBIC PLATE COUNT
- Page 174 and 175: il . --.-_._ 1+_- /: _- : _ _ _ _ _
- Page 176 and 177: , I . ‘ r , r , c I, , -1 ’ I .
- Page 178: I I ’ , ’ . I : , I ’ I 1 * :
- Page 181 and 182: Reed, R. J., G. R. Ammerman, and T.
- Page 183 and 184: Antioxidants can be added to increa
- Page 185 and 186: Table 1. Effect of wash treatment o
- Page 187 and 188: Table 2. Effect of antioxidant trea
- Page 189 and 190: (1993) for whole dressed catfish. C
- Page 191 and 192: Anonymous. 1992. Processing up 11%
- Page 193 and 194: Sin&_&x, R. O. and Yu, T. C. 1958.
- Page 195 and 196: 1. Materials MATERIALS AND METHODS
- Page 197: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Aroma profil
- Page 200 and 201: .z%M 5 =w B 14 29 39 4142 53 64 25
- Page 202 and 203: .s CM 8 C s-t B W S' a .g CM $ C .-
- Page 204 and 205: Marshall, G.A. Moody, M.W., Hackney
- Page 208 and 209: STORAGE CHARACTERISTICS OF FROZEN B
- Page 210 and 211: OPTIMUM CONDITIONS FOR THE PREPARAT
- Page 212 and 213: 3 BUILDING STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS F
- Page 214 and 215: for aquaculture supporting developm
- Page 216 and 217: problem solving of complex regional
- Page 218 and 219: DESIGN OF AN AUTOMAT EVALUATION DEV
- Page 220 and 221: sides of the shrimp were averaged.
- Page 222 and 223: Ammonia Measurements Figure 2 shows
- Page 224 and 225: REFERENCES Balaban, M. O., Yeralan,
- Page 226 and 227: QUALITIES OF FRESH AND PREVIOUSLY F
- Page 228 and 229: For the samples stored for six mont
- Page 230 and 231: stored for six month, had lower bac
- Page 232 and 233: Table 1. Psychrotrophic bacterial p
- Page 234 and 235: Table 7. Juiciness of refrigerated
- Page 236 and 237: Table 12. Cohesiveness of baked ref
- Page 238 and 239: Table 16. Shear force and centrifti
- Page 240 and 241: SAS Institute Inc. 1987. “SAS/STA
- Page 242 and 243: with a color chart. In this paper,
- Page 244 and 245: TABLE 1 Comparison of Histamine Tes
- Page 246 and 247: 11, Chassande, O., Renard, S., Barb
- Page 248 and 249: FIGURE 1 Time Course for Histamine
- Page 250 and 251: BACKGROUND A Rapid, Easily Used Tes
- Page 252 and 253: We acknowledge with thanks the inte
- Page 254 and 255: AOAC Add 1 ml Extract to 8 cm Prepa
AN OVERVIEW OF THE NMFS PRODUCT QUAL TU PR<br />
Michael L. Jahncke, E. Spencer Garrett, and John M. Tennyson<br />
NMFS<br />
<strong>National</strong> <strong>Sea</strong>food Inspection Laboratory<br />
PO Drawer 1207<br />
Pascagoula, MS 39568<br />
NMFS has four major laboratories concerned with seafood product quality and safety. These<br />
facilities are located in Gloucester, MA, Charleston, SC, Pascagoula, MS and <strong>Sea</strong>ttle, WA. With <strong>the</strong><br />
exception of <strong>the</strong> NSIL facility in Pascagoula, MS which is solely dedicated to <strong>the</strong> <strong>National</strong> NMFS Inspection<br />
Program, <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r facilities are fully integrated in <strong>the</strong> NMFS Fishery System of Habitat Protection,<br />
Environmental Contaminant Monitoring, Biotoxins, New Methods Development;Population Dynamics, and<br />
Aquaculture. Such Product Quality and Safety Laboratories bring an integrated fishery system approach to<br />
consumer protection and serve as available resource base to NSIL and <strong>the</strong> NMFS Inspection Program. The<br />
programs of each facility are integrated into supporting seafood inspection needs. To insure program<br />
integration, a <strong>National</strong> <strong>Sea</strong>food Product Quality and Safety “Tiger Team” coordinating is composed of each<br />
Product Quality and Safety Laboratory Director and <strong>the</strong> Directors of <strong>the</strong> Environmental Conservation<br />
Division and Inspection Services Division. The purpose of <strong>the</strong> “Tiger Team” is to annually plan, update,<br />
and implement a coordinated program of scientific research and services to meet both short and long term<br />
needs to <strong>the</strong> NMFS Inspection Program. All NSIL activities are integrated into this Product Quality Safety<br />
fishery support system. An overview of this program will be presented.<br />
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE AQUACULTURE RESEARCH PLANS<br />
Thomas C. Siewicki<br />
NMFS<br />
PO Box 12607<br />
Charleston, SC 29412-0607<br />
The <strong>National</strong> Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) is preparing plans for new research on marine<br />
aquaculture at both <strong>the</strong> national and sou<strong>the</strong>rn regional levels. Increases in research are dependent upon<br />
policy decisions and allocation of resources by <strong>the</strong> Agency. Within <strong>the</strong> region, impediment to aquaculture<br />
development have been identified by three mechanisms: (1) review on recently published analyses of <strong>the</strong><br />
industry; (2) informal discussions with researchers and entrepreneurs in all sou<strong>the</strong>astern states and <strong>the</strong> U.S.<br />
Caribbean; and (3) a workshop that included representatives from throughout <strong>the</strong> region covering a broad<br />
range of technical disciplines and experiences.<br />
Workshop participants described a progressive industry and identified major obstacles to full<br />
realization of industry goals within ten years. Recommendations for NMFS involvement have been prepared<br />
that consider priority needs for <strong>the</strong> industry, <strong>the</strong> strengths and mission of <strong>the</strong> Agency, and close coordination<br />
with o<strong>the</strong>r agencies and industry.