4 °C - the National Sea Grant Library
4 °C - the National Sea Grant Library 4 °C - the National Sea Grant Library
. Establish a formal database on the occurrence of seafood-borne disease. c. Determine Gulf Coast residents at risk from consumption of potentially contaminated seafood. d. Survey Gulf Coast bathing beaches for the presence of human fecal wastes and other pathogens (i.e., Vibrio sp.) e. Assess the public health significance of marine biotoxins in the marine environment. f. Implement remote-sensing technologies for the identification of phytoplankton blooms/red tides in the early stages of development. 3. STANDARDS AND ENFORCEMENT (action items 19-36) OBJECTIVES a. Reduce the level of human wastes in the coastal waters of the Gulf of Mexico. b. Establish a Gulf Coast Fish Contaminants Group. c. Encourage states to adopt compatible policies for management of public health hazards. d. Standardize methods for marine biotoxin identification and analysis from phytoplankton producers and seafood vectors. e. Organize a Gulf-wide marine biotoxins management and consulting group. 4. PUBLIC OUTREACH (PO) (action items 37-44) OBJECTIVES a. Undertake an educational campaign to (1) help the public understand and control or minimize potential risks associated with the consumption of raw molluscan shellfish; (2) help health care professionals understand the potential risks associated with the consumption of raw molluscan shellfish, especially high risk patients, and to transmit information to these patients and encourage the reporting; (3) help legislative and judicial members understand the seriousness of violations of shellfishing regulations related to public health, (4) inform enforcement officials about public health aspects of shellfishing reguIations. b. Help the public understand the nutritional/health benefits and the potential risks from consumption of seafood, other than raw
molluscan shellfish, as well as how to maximize those benefits while avoiding, controlling, or minimizing risks. c. Help the public, especially high risk populations, understand the risks associated with recreational and occupational exposure to naturally occurring pathogens (i.e., Vibrio sp.) in marine waters. d. Help the public understand the risks associated with consumption of seafood contaminated with marine biotoxins and the risks associated with direct exposure to marine biotoxins. In Fy 1994, projects were accepted through interagency agreements among federal agencies. Some of the projects were further meted out to academia through grant programs by those designated federal agencies. In FY 95 preproposals are being sent out and may be awarded directly to academia, states, other federal agencies, or to non-profit organizations depending on the projects developed and the degree of partnering cited. There have been developed 44 specific action items aligned under the four strategies. The top priority action items have been highlighted for project development. (R&D) (M&A) 1. Methods for Identification of Indicator Organisms Originating From Human Fecal Sources (1995); goal 1; ISSC, NOAA, FDA, EPA, academia, industry) 2. Identification of sources of chemical contaminants and pathogens (1994; goals #l, 3 &4; EPA, states, Toxic Substances and Pesticides Subcommittee, GoMPPHC) 3. State ambient water quality assessment and monitoring needs (1993; goal 4; EPA, states) 4. Atmospheric deposition research (1994; goal 3; EPA) 5. Discussion meeting- Coordination of Marine Biotoxin Research (1993; goal 2; GoMPPHC) 6. Coordination of Marine Biotoxins Research (1995; goal 2; FDA, NMFS, EPA, NIH) 7. Survey and classification of shellfish growing areas (1993; goal 1; states, FDA)
- Page 4 and 5: TABLE OF CONTENTS PAPERS & ABSTRACT
- Page 6 and 7: Evaluation of On-board Handling Tec
- Page 8 and 9: oduction of a Sardine Substitute Jo
- Page 10 and 11: Effects of Temperature and Humidity
- Page 12 and 13: Force. and the U.S. Coast Guard. Th
- Page 14 and 15: for the program, showing that state
- Page 16 and 17: 12/18/92 such as diversion. The lat
- Page 20 and 21: 8. Standard reporting for seafood-b
- Page 22 and 23: 38. Education effort/materials on b
- Page 24 and 25: egional business and industry may n
- Page 26 and 27: PROJECT CODE: 95/PH/A10,13/P2 PROJE
- Page 28 and 29: PROJECT CODE: 95/PH/A28/P1 PROJECT
- Page 30 and 31: PROJECT CODE: 95/PH/A29/P3 PROJECT
- Page 32 and 33: t PROJECT CODE: 95/PH/A37/P2 PROJEC
- Page 34 and 35: investigate the problem. The ISSC w
- Page 36 and 37: strategic plan for conference actio
- Page 38 and 39: (4) advisory committee, and all con
- Page 40 and 41: IRRADIATION TO ENSURE HYGIENIC QUAL
- Page 42 and 43: food. Often, food manufacturers hav
- Page 44 and 45: BACTERIA D-VALUE (kGy) E. coli 0.15
- Page 46 and 47: ECONOMICS OF IRRADIATION OF FISH AN
- Page 48 and 49: B. Market Testing of Irradiated Foo
- Page 50 and 51: The Agreement on the Application of
- Page 52 and 53: Table 1. Optimum radiation dose lev
- Page 54 and 55: Loaharanu, P. 1973. Gamma irradiati
- Page 56 and 57: EFFECTS OF LOW-DOSE GAMMA IRRADIATI
- Page 58 and 59: diving bell and lowered into the wa
- Page 60 and 61: 12 1 Survival Curve for Standard Pl
- Page 62 and 63: 6 D value = 0.05 kGy ‘A. 0 / I I
- Page 64 and 65: Dvalue=O.S9kGy 3.8 a’, 3.6 . 3.4
- Page 66 and 67: 8 0 . 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.S 0.6 rlrah
molluscan shellfish, as well as how to maximize those benefits while<br />
avoiding, controlling, or minimizing risks.<br />
c. Help <strong>the</strong> public, especially high risk populations, understand <strong>the</strong><br />
risks associated with recreational and occupational exposure to<br />
naturally occurring pathogens (i.e., Vibrio sp.) in marine waters.<br />
d. Help <strong>the</strong> public understand <strong>the</strong> risks associated with consumption<br />
of seafood contaminated with marine biotoxins and <strong>the</strong> risks<br />
associated with direct exposure to marine biotoxins.<br />
In Fy 1994, projects were accepted through interagency agreements among federal<br />
agencies. Some of <strong>the</strong> projects were fur<strong>the</strong>r meted out to academia through grant<br />
programs by those designated federal agencies. In FY 95 preproposals are being sent<br />
out and may be awarded directly to academia, states, o<strong>the</strong>r federal agencies, or to<br />
non-profit organizations depending on <strong>the</strong> projects developed and <strong>the</strong> degree of<br />
partnering cited.<br />
There have been developed 44 specific action items aligned under <strong>the</strong> four strategies.<br />
The top priority action items have been highlighted for project development.<br />
(R&D)<br />
(M&A)<br />
1. Methods for Identification of Indicator Organisms<br />
Originating From Human Fecal Sources (1995); goal 1; ISSC,<br />
NOAA, FDA, EPA, academia, industry)<br />
2. Identification of sources of chemical contaminants and<br />
pathogens (1994; goals #l, 3 &4; EPA, states, Toxic Substances<br />
and Pesticides Subcommittee, GoMPPHC)<br />
3. State ambient water quality assessment and monitoring needs<br />
(1993; goal 4; EPA, states)<br />
4. Atmospheric deposition research (1994; goal 3; EPA)<br />
5. Discussion meeting- Coordination of Marine Biotoxin<br />
Research (1993; goal 2; GoMPPHC)<br />
6. Coordination of Marine Biotoxins Research (1995; goal 2;<br />
FDA, NMFS, EPA, NIH)<br />
7. Survey and classification of shellfish growing areas (1993; goal<br />
1; states, FDA)