4 °C - the National Sea Grant Library

4 °C - the National Sea Grant Library 4 °C - the National Sea Grant Library

nsgl.gso.uri.edu
from nsgl.gso.uri.edu More from this publisher
25.12.2012 Views

used to evaluate both heating and cooling curves by four product types; lump, backfin, special and claw. Preliminary evaluation of steam distribution within the tunnel was performed using a portable potentiometer (Model No. 3087, Yokowgawa Corp. of America, Newman, GA) equipped with copper-constantan (type-T) thermocouple wire and two inch stainless steel (s.s.) needle thermocouples (Ecklund-Harrison Technologies, Inc., Fort Myers, FL). Air temperatures were monitored within the tunnel at 12 inch intervals (6 locations). Heat penetration studies were performed on the four product types to establish standard operating procedures (SOPs) and to determine a process schedule (i.e., time and temperature). After process standardization was achieved, a total of nine heat penetration profiles were obtained for each of the four product types studied. These data were obtained by inserting a thermocouple in the largest portion of crab meat centered on a perforated s.s. tray. Each tray held two pounds of meat that was leveled to less than one inch in thickness. Heat penetration profiles were monitored with a hand-held thermometer (Model HH-21, Omega Instruments, Inc., Stamford, CT) equipped with type-T thermocouple wire and a two inch s.s. needle thermocouple (Ecklund-Harrison Technologies, Inc., Fort Myers, FL). Exit temperatures for the atmospheric steamed crab meat were measured and air cooling monitored with the hand held thermometer during transfer from the perforated S.S. trays to sanitized solid s.s. trays. Samples were allowed to air cool approximately 10-15 minutes in the solid s.s. tray before packing into standard 16 oz. copolymer polyethylene cups (Venture Plastics, Inc., Monroeville, Ohio). The containers were weighed, capped and sealed with tamper evident low density polyethylene seals and packed on ice (50 pounds per waxed corrugated cardboard box). Product cooling rates on ice were monitored with use of molded plastic thermocouples (Ecklund-Harrison Technologies, Inc., Fort Myers, FL) inserted through the top of the snap-on lids for the 16 oz. polyethylene containers. Temperature profiles for packed crab meats during cooling were monitored until the core meat temperature approached 10 °C. A comparison of cooling rates for crab meat allowed to air cool prior to packing on ice versus direct hot-filling and then packed on ice was performed in order to evaluate the effects of initial meat temperature on cooling rates. The hypothesis was that the rate of cooling would be faster for “hot-fill” packing compared with “aircool” packing since the driving force (e.g., heat) would be greater. The hot-fill

technique would reduce the potential for recontamination of product after steaming by decreasing the time that meat is exposed to the plant environment (i.e., air). Special crab meat was chosen for the purpose of this comparative study. Cooling rate profiles of crab meat were obtained for air-cool and hot-fill process techniques, respectively, according to procedures described in Part II. Due to the difficulty in handling crab meat at high temperatures, no samples were packed by hand with temperatures exceeding 65.5°C. Model simulations In order to simulate temperatures greater than 65.5°C , a mathematical spreadsheet (Quattro Pro for Windows, Version 5.0, Borland International) and model generator (MathCAD 2.0, Addison-Wesley) were used to curve fit cooling data and extrapolate initial meat temperatures outside the experimental range obtained at the processing plant. By generating models for these cooling rates a better understanding of how to improve the atmospheric steam process could be obtained. Models were developed using the following exponential equation: T t = T sur+ T 0 * e -(K*t) (1) T t is the meat temperature at any time, t. T sur is the surrounding temperature. T o is the initial temperature minus the surrounding temperature. K is the rate constant and t is time. This model clearly shows that the temperature at any time t is dependent not only on the surrounding temperature but also on the initial meat temperature. The constant K which determines exactly how fast the meat will cool can be calculated with the following equation: ln(T t - T sur) T 0 t = K (2) It can be seen from equation (2), that if time remains constant and the surrounding temperature is constant then crab meat with the higher initial temperature will have a faster cooling rate. This translates simply into the fact that the hotter a body is the faster that it cools. Knowing this, the question now becomes at what initial meat temperature does this make a significant difference in the cooling time? Since only a small difference in cooling time was actually observed between air-cool and hot-fill packing of meat, it was further hypothesized that there must be an optimum temperature in which to pack crab meat to obtain the maximum cooling rate and

used to evaluate both heating and cooling curves by four product types; lump,<br />

backfin, special and claw.<br />

Preliminary evaluation of steam distribution within <strong>the</strong> tunnel was performed<br />

using a portable potentiometer (Model No. 3087, Yokowgawa Corp. of America,<br />

Newman, GA) equipped with copper-constantan (type-T) <strong>the</strong>rmocouple wire and two<br />

inch stainless steel (s.s.) needle <strong>the</strong>rmocouples (Ecklund-Harrison Technologies, Inc.,<br />

Fort Myers, FL). Air temperatures were monitored within <strong>the</strong> tunnel at 12 inch<br />

intervals (6 locations). Heat penetration studies were performed on <strong>the</strong> four product<br />

types to establish standard operating procedures (SOPs) and to determine a process<br />

schedule (i.e., time and temperature).<br />

After process standardization was achieved, a total of nine heat penetration<br />

profiles were obtained for each of <strong>the</strong> four product types studied. These data were<br />

obtained by inserting a <strong>the</strong>rmocouple in <strong>the</strong> largest portion of crab meat centered on<br />

a perforated s.s. tray. Each tray held two pounds of meat that was leveled to less than<br />

one inch in thickness. Heat penetration profiles were monitored with a hand-held<br />

<strong>the</strong>rmometer (Model HH-21, Omega Instruments, Inc., Stamford, CT) equipped with<br />

type-T <strong>the</strong>rmocouple wire and a two inch s.s. needle <strong>the</strong>rmocouple (Ecklund-Harrison<br />

Technologies, Inc., Fort Myers, FL).<br />

Exit temperatures for <strong>the</strong> atmospheric steamed crab meat were measured and<br />

air cooling monitored with <strong>the</strong> hand held <strong>the</strong>rmometer during transfer from <strong>the</strong><br />

perforated S.S. trays to sanitized solid s.s. trays. Samples were allowed to air cool<br />

approximately 10-15 minutes in <strong>the</strong> solid s.s. tray before packing into standard 16 oz.<br />

copolymer polyethylene cups (Venture Plastics, Inc., Monroeville, Ohio). The<br />

containers were weighed, capped and sealed with tamper evident low density<br />

polyethylene seals and packed on ice (50 pounds per waxed corrugated cardboard<br />

box). Product cooling rates on ice were monitored with use of molded plastic<br />

<strong>the</strong>rmocouples (Ecklund-Harrison Technologies, Inc., Fort Myers, FL) inserted<br />

through <strong>the</strong> top of <strong>the</strong> snap-on lids for <strong>the</strong> 16 oz. polyethylene containers.<br />

Temperature profiles for packed crab meats during cooling were monitored until <strong>the</strong><br />

core meat temperature approached 10 <strong>°C</strong>.<br />

A comparison of cooling rates for crab meat allowed to air cool prior to<br />

packing on ice versus direct hot-filling and <strong>the</strong>n packed on ice was performed in order<br />

to evaluate <strong>the</strong> effects of initial meat temperature on cooling rates. The hypo<strong>the</strong>sis<br />

was that <strong>the</strong> rate of cooling would be faster for “hot-fill” packing compared with “aircool”<br />

packing since <strong>the</strong> driving force (e.g., heat) would be greater. The hot-fill

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!