10.06.2022 Views

The Sacred Hoop: Recovering the Feminine in American Indian Traditions

by Paula Gunn Allen

by Paula Gunn Allen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> s<strong>in</strong> Adam and Eve committed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Garden of Eden was<br />

attempt<strong>in</strong>g to become knowledgeable. <strong>The</strong>ir attempt opened <strong>the</strong><br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r possibility that, with knowledge, <strong>the</strong>y might become<br />

immortal. This, apparently, was not acceptable, not because<br />

knowledge and immortality were s<strong>in</strong>ful but because <strong>the</strong><br />

possession of <strong>the</strong>m by human be<strong>in</strong>gs would reorder <strong>the</strong><br />

hierarchical pr<strong>in</strong>ciples on which <strong>the</strong> Judeo-Christian universe is<br />

posited. Those reared <strong>in</strong> a Christian society are <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ed to<br />

perceive social relationships—and literary works—<strong>in</strong> this<br />

context; <strong>the</strong>y order events and phenomena <strong>in</strong> hierarchical and<br />

dualistic terms. Those reared <strong>in</strong> traditional <strong>American</strong> <strong>Indian</strong><br />

societies are <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ed to relate events and experiences to one<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r. <strong>The</strong>y do not organize perceptions or external events <strong>in</strong><br />

terms of dualities or priorities. This egalitarianism is reflected<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> structure of <strong>American</strong> <strong>Indian</strong> literature, which does not<br />

rely on conflict, crisis, and resolution for organization, nor does<br />

its merit depend on <strong>the</strong> parentage, education, or connections of<br />

<strong>the</strong> author. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, its significance is determ<strong>in</strong>ed by its relation<br />

to creative empowerment, its reflection of tribal understand<strong>in</strong>gs,<br />

and its relation to <strong>the</strong> unitary nature of reality.<br />

<strong>The</strong> way <strong>the</strong> loon prays <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Cheyenne creation story is<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicative of that difference. <strong>The</strong> loon looks around him as he<br />

addresses Maheo, “for he knew that Maheo was all about him,”<br />

just as earlier <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> story <strong>the</strong> snowgoose addressed Maheo <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se words: “I do not know where you are, but I know you must<br />

be everywhere.” 8<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r difference between <strong>the</strong>se two ways of perceiv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

reality lies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> tendency of <strong>the</strong> <strong>American</strong> <strong>Indian</strong> to view space<br />

as spherical and time as cyclical, whereas <strong>the</strong> non-<strong>Indian</strong> tends<br />

to view space as l<strong>in</strong>ear and time as sequential. <strong>The</strong> circular<br />

concept requires all “po<strong>in</strong>ts” that make up <strong>the</strong> sphere of be<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

have a significant identity and function, while <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>ear model<br />

assumes that some “po<strong>in</strong>ts” are more significant than o<strong>the</strong>rs. In

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!