10.06.2022 Views

The Sacred Hoop: Recovering the Feminine in American Indian Traditions

by Paula Gunn Allen

by Paula Gunn Allen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

questioner and <strong>the</strong> newcomer.<br />

Aga<strong>in</strong>, community <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> non-<strong>Indian</strong> modern world tends to<br />

mean people who occupy a def<strong>in</strong>able geographical area or who<br />

share a culture (lifestyle) or occupation. It can extend to <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

people who share an important common <strong>in</strong>terest—political,<br />

avocational, or spiritual. But “community” <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>American</strong><br />

<strong>Indian</strong> world can mean those who are of a similar clan and<br />

Spirit; those who are encompassed by a particular Spirit-be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

are members of a community. In fact, this was <strong>the</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g most<br />

often given to <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>in</strong> traditional tribal cultures. So it was<br />

not impossible that members of a community could have been a<br />

number of women who “belonged” to a given medic<strong>in</strong>e society<br />

or who were alike <strong>in</strong> that <strong>the</strong>y shared consciousness of a certa<strong>in</strong><br />

Spirit.<br />

Women and Power<br />

Any discussion of <strong>the</strong> status of women <strong>in</strong> general and of<br />

lesbians <strong>in</strong> particular cannot hope for accuracy if one<br />

misunderstands women’s power <strong>in</strong> tribal societies. Indeed, <strong>in</strong> a<br />

recent random sampl<strong>in</strong>g of general ethnographies of several<br />

groups, I have noted that all matters of female life <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> group<br />

under discussion can be found under <strong>the</strong> head<strong>in</strong>g “Woman.” This<br />

head<strong>in</strong>g is divided <strong>in</strong>to marriage, childbear<strong>in</strong>g, childrear<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

housekeep<strong>in</strong>g, and, perhaps, menstruation. <strong>The</strong> discussions are<br />

neatly ordered accord<strong>in</strong>g to middle-class white views about<br />

where women fit <strong>in</strong>to social schemes, but <strong>the</strong>y conta<strong>in</strong> a number<br />

of false implications, not <strong>the</strong> least of which is that men don’t<br />

marry, have children, or participate <strong>in</strong> childrear<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

It is clear, I th<strong>in</strong>k, that <strong>the</strong> ground we are explor<strong>in</strong>g here is<br />

obscure: women <strong>in</strong> general have not been taken seriously by<br />

ethnographers or folklorists, and explorations that have been

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!