10.06.2022 Views

The Sacred Hoop: Recovering the Feminine in American Indian Traditions

by Paula Gunn Allen

by Paula Gunn Allen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Actually, <strong>the</strong> legitimacy of mo<strong>the</strong>rhood was determ<strong>in</strong>ed by its<br />

very existence. A woman who gave birth was a mo<strong>the</strong>r as long<br />

as she had a liv<strong>in</strong>g child, and <strong>the</strong> source of a household’s<br />

legitimacy was its very existence. <strong>American</strong> <strong>Indian</strong>s were and<br />

are mystical, but <strong>the</strong>y were and are a very practical people.<br />

While <strong>the</strong>re can be little question about <strong>the</strong> fact that most<br />

women married, perhaps several times, it is important to<br />

remember that tribal marriages often bore little resemblance to<br />

western concepts of that <strong>in</strong>stitution. Much that has been written<br />

about marriage as practiced among <strong>American</strong> <strong>Indian</strong>s is wrong.<br />

Among many tribes divorce was an easy matter for both<br />

women and men, and movement of <strong>in</strong>dividuals from one<br />

household to ano<strong>the</strong>r was fluid and essentially unconstra<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are many exceptions to this, for <strong>the</strong> tribes were dist<strong>in</strong>ct<br />

social groups; but many had patterns that did not use sexual<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>t as a means of social control. With<strong>in</strong> such systems,<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual action was believed to be directed by Spirits (through<br />

dreams, visions, direct encounter, or possession of power<br />

objects such as stones, shells, masks, or fetishes). In this context<br />

it is quite possible that lesbianism was practiced ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

commonly, as long as <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals cooperated with <strong>the</strong> larger<br />

social customs. Women were generally constra<strong>in</strong>ed to have<br />

children, but <strong>in</strong> many tribes, childbear<strong>in</strong>g meant empowerment. It<br />

was <strong>the</strong> passport to maturity and <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>in</strong> woman-culture. An<br />

important po<strong>in</strong>t is that women who did not have children<br />

because of constitutional, personal, or Spirit-directed<br />

dis<strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ation had o<strong>the</strong>r ways to experience Spirit <strong>in</strong>struction<br />

and stabilization, to exercise power, and to be mo<strong>the</strong>rs.<br />

“Family” did not mean what is usually meant by that term <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> modern western world. One’s family might have been<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> biological terms as those to whom one was blood k<strong>in</strong>.<br />

More often it was def<strong>in</strong>ed by o<strong>the</strong>r considerations; spiritual<br />

k<strong>in</strong>ship was at least as important a factor as “blood.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!