30.05.2022 Views

Data integrity PIC S

good practices for data management and integrity in regulatory GMP/GDP environments

good practices for data management and integrity in regulatory GMP/GDP environments

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

audit trails related to each operation should be independently reviewed with

all other records related to the operation and prior to the review of the

completion of the operation (e.g. prior to batch release) so as to ensure that

critical data and changes to it are acceptable. This review should be

performed by the originating department, and where necessary verified by

the quality unit, e.g. during self-inspection or investigative activities.

Non-critical audit trails reviews can be conducted during system reviews at

a pre-defined frequency. This review should be performed by the

originating department, and where necessary verified by the quality unit

(e.g. during batch release, self-inspection or investigative activities).

Potential risk of not meeting expectations/items to be checked

Validation documentation should demonstrate that audit trails are

functional, and that all activities, changes and other transactions

within the systems are recorded, together with all relevant

metadata.

Verify that audit trails are regularly reviewed (in accordance with

quality risk management principles) and that discrepancies are

investigated.

If no electronic audit trail system exists a paper based record to

demonstrate changes to data may be acceptable until a fully audit

trailed (integrated system or independent audit software using a

validated interface) system becomes available. These hybrid

systems are permitted, where they achieve equivalence to

integrated audit trail, such as described in Annex 11 of the PIC/S

GMP Guide.

Failure to adequately review audit trails may allow manipulated or

erroneous data to be inadvertently accepted by the Quality Unit

and/or Authorised Person.

Clear details of which data are critical, and which changes and

deletions should be recorded (audit trail) should be documented.

2. Expectation

Where available, audit trail functionalities for electronic-based systems

should be assessed and configured properly to capture any critical activities

relating to the acquisition, deletion, overwriting of and changes to data for

audit purposes.

Audit trails should be configured to record all manually initiated processes

related to critical data.

The system should provide a secure, computer generated, time stamped

audit trail to independently record the date and time of entries and actions

that create, modify, or delete electronic records.

The audit trail should include the following parameters:

- details of the user that undertook the action;

- what action occurred, was changed, incl. old and new values;

- when the action was taken, incl. date and time ;

- why the action was taken (reason); and

PI 041-1 46 of 63 1 July 2021

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!