What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell

What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell

davispolk.com
from davispolk.com More from this publisher
25.12.2012 Views

§ 1A:7.2 BROKER-DEALER REGULATION on its own initiative generally would not be regarded as unsolicited if the client had been the subject of marketing efforts by a foreign brokerdealer or its affiliates. In practice, this exemption is relatively limited in its utility. [B][3] Research The distribution of securities research in the United States may be a form of solicitation and is therefore an activity that should generally be done by or in conjunction with a Registered Broker-Dealer, unless an exemption applies. Rule 15a-6(a)(2) provides an exemption for foreign broker-dealers who furnish research reports 379 directly to major U.S. institutional investors 380 and effect transactions in the securities discussed in the research reports with or for those major U.S. institutional investors, subject to certain conditions. The conditions include: (i) the research reports do not recommend the use of the foreign broker-dealer to effect trades in any security; 381 379. Rule 15a-6(a)(2) does not distinguish between research reports provided in written or electronic form. See Rule 15a-6 Adopting Release, supra note 28, at n.106. 380. Rule 15a-6(b)(4) defines “major U.S. institutional investor” as “a person that is (i) [a] U.S. institutional investor that has, or has under management, total assets in excess of $100 million; provided, however, that for purposes of determining the total assets of an investment company under this rule, the investment company may include the assets of any family of investment companies of which it is a part; or (ii) [a]n investment adviser registered with the Commission under Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 that has total assets under management in excess of $100 million.” Rule 15a-6(b)(4). Rule 15a-6(b)(7) defines “U.S. institutional investor” as “a person that is (i) [a]n investment company registered with the Commission under Section 8 of the Investment Company Act of 1940; or (ii) [a] bank, savings and loan association, insurance company, business development company, small business investment company, or employee benefit plan defined in Rule 501(a)(1) of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933; a private business development company defined in Rule 501(a)(2); an organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, as defined in Rule 501(a)(3); or a trust defined in Rule 501(a)(7).” Rule 15a-6(b)(7). As noted in infra note 385, the definition of “major U.S. institutional investor” was effectively extended in a subsequent no-action letter to include any entity, including any investment adviser (whether or not registered under the Investment Advisers Act), that owns or controls (or, in the case of an investment adviser, has under management) in excess of $100 million in aggregate financial assets. 381. Rule 15a-6(a)(2)(i). The SEC would not consider disclosure in the research report that the foreign broker-dealer is a market maker in a security discussed in the report to violate this requirement. See Rule 15a-6 Adopting Release, supra note 28, at 100–101. 1A–86

What Is a Broker-Dealer? § 1A:7.2 (ii) the foreign broker-dealer does not initiate contact with those major U.S. institutional investors to follow up on the research reports or otherwise induce or attempt to induce purchase or sale of any security by those major U.S. institutional investors; 382 (iii) the foreign broker-dealer effects transactions in the securities discussed in the research through a Registered Broker-Dealer pursuant to Rule 15a-6(a)(3); 383 and (iv) the foreign broker-dealer does not provide research to U.S. persons pursuant to any express or implied understanding that those U.S. persons will direct commission income to the foreign broker-dealer. 384 In practice, Rule 15a-6(a)(2) provides limited relief to global investment banks. [B][4] Rule 15a-6(a)(3) Arrangements Rule 15a-6(a)(3) permits foreign broker-dealers to solicit U.S. institutional investors and major U.S. institutional investors (but not other entities or natural persons) 385 through a Registered 382. Rule 15a-6(a)(2)(ii). If a foreign broker-dealer wished to initiate direct contact with U.S. persons, it could do so using the direct contact exemption in Rule 15a-6(a)(3). See Rule 15a-6 Adopting Release, supra note 28, at 47. In its no-action letter on April 9, 1997, the SEC confirmed that Rule 15a-6(a)(2)(ii) would not prohibit a foreign broker-dealer from initiating follow-up contacts with major U.S. institutional investors to which it has furnished research reports, if such follow-up contacts occur in the context of a relationship between the foreign broker-dealer and a U.S. intermediary broker-dealer as permitted under Rule 15a-6(a)(3). See Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton, SEC No-Action Letter (Apr. 9, 1997) [hereinafter Nine Firms Letter]. 383. Rule 15a-6(a)(2)(iii). 384. Rule 15a-6(a)(2)(iv). 385. The definitions of “U.S. institutional investor” and “major U.S. institutional investor” do not include U.S. business corporations and partnerships, nor do they permit investment funds to qualify as major U.S. institutional investors if they are advised by investment managers that are exempt from registration under the Investment Advisers Act. The SEC, in the U.S. Affiliates Letter, expanded the class of U.S. investors that a foreign broker-dealer may contact. It granted no-action relief that would permit, on the same basis as permitted for transactions with “major U.S. institutional investors” under Rule 15a-6, a U.S-affiliated foreign brokerdealer to enter into transactions with any entity, including any investment adviser (whether or not registered under the Investment Advisers Act), that owns or controls (or, in the case of an investment adviser, has under (Broker-Dealer Reg., Rel. #9, 9/10) 1A–87

§ 1A:7.2 BROKER-DEALER REGULATION<br />

on its own initiative generally would not be regarded as unsolicited if<br />

the client had been the subject of marketing efforts by a foreign brokerdealer<br />

or its affiliates. In practice, th<strong>is</strong> exemption <strong>is</strong> relatively limited<br />

in its utility.<br />

[B][3] Research<br />

The d<strong>is</strong>tribution of securities research in the United States may be a<br />

form of solicitation and <strong>is</strong> therefore an activity that should generally be<br />

done by or in conjunction with a Reg<strong>is</strong>tered <strong>Broker</strong>-<strong>Dealer</strong>, unless an<br />

exemption applies. Rule 15a-6(a)(2) provides an exemption for foreign<br />

broker-dealers who furn<strong>is</strong>h research reports 379 directly to major U.S.<br />

institutional investors 380 and effect transactions in the securities<br />

d<strong>is</strong>cussed in the research reports with or for those major U.S. institutional<br />

investors, subject to certain conditions. The conditions include:<br />

(i) the research reports do not recommend the use of the foreign<br />

broker-dealer to effect trades in any security; 381<br />

379. Rule 15a-6(a)(2) does not d<strong>is</strong>tingu<strong>is</strong>h between research reports provided<br />

in written or electronic form. See Rule 15a-6 Adopting Release, supra<br />

note 28, at n.106.<br />

380. Rule 15a-6(b)(4) defines “major U.S. institutional investor” as “a person<br />

that <strong>is</strong> (i) [a] U.S. institutional investor that has, or has under management,<br />

total assets in excess of $100 million; provided, however, that for<br />

purposes of determining the total assets of an investment company under<br />

th<strong>is</strong> rule, the investment company may include the assets of any family of<br />

investment companies of which it <strong>is</strong> a part; or (ii) [a]n investment adv<strong>is</strong>er<br />

reg<strong>is</strong>tered with the Comm<strong>is</strong>sion under Section 203 of the Investment<br />

Adv<strong>is</strong>ers Act of 1940 that has total assets under management in excess of<br />

$100 million.” Rule 15a-6(b)(4). Rule 15a-6(b)(7) defines “U.S. institutional<br />

investor” as “a person that <strong>is</strong> (i) [a]n investment company reg<strong>is</strong>tered<br />

with the Comm<strong>is</strong>sion under Section 8 of the Investment Company Act of<br />

1940; or (ii) [a] bank, savings and loan association, insurance company,<br />

business development company, small business investment company, or<br />

employee benefit plan defined in Rule 501(a)(1) of Regulation D under the<br />

Securities Act of 1933; a private business development company defined in<br />

Rule 501(a)(2); an organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the<br />

Internal Revenue Code, as defined in Rule 501(a)(3); or a trust defined<br />

in Rule 501(a)(7).” Rule 15a-6(b)(7). As noted in infra note 385, the<br />

definition of “major U.S. institutional investor” was effectively extended<br />

in a subsequent no-action letter to include any entity, including any<br />

investment adv<strong>is</strong>er (whether or not reg<strong>is</strong>tered under the Investment<br />

Adv<strong>is</strong>ers Act), that owns or controls (or, in the case of an investment<br />

adv<strong>is</strong>er, has under management) in excess of $100 million in aggregate<br />

financial assets.<br />

381. Rule 15a-6(a)(2)(i). The SEC would not consider d<strong>is</strong>closure in the research<br />

report that the foreign broker-dealer <strong>is</strong> a market maker in a security<br />

d<strong>is</strong>cussed in the report to violate th<strong>is</strong> requirement. See Rule 15a-6<br />

Adopting Release, supra note 28, at 100–101.<br />

1A–86

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!