25.12.2012 Views

What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell

What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell

What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

§ 1A:7.2 BROKER-DEALER REGULATION<br />

“without the jur<strong>is</strong>diction of the United States” in section 30(b) does<br />

not refer to territorial limits of th<strong>is</strong> country, and a broker-dealer<br />

operating outside the physical boundaries of the United States, but<br />

using the U.S. mails, wires, or telephone lines to trade securities with<br />

U.S. persons located in th<strong>is</strong> country, would not be, in the words of<br />

section 30(b), transacting a business in securities without the jur<strong>is</strong>diction<br />

of the United States. 370<br />

The SEC also takes the view that, in the absence of some available<br />

reg<strong>is</strong>tration exemption, solicitation of securities business from within<br />

the United States <strong>is</strong> an activity requiring broker-dealer reg<strong>is</strong>tration,<br />

even if the investors being solicited are exclusively foreign persons<br />

physically located outside the United States. 371<br />

The U.S. Supreme Court recently held that the antifraud prov<strong>is</strong>ions<br />

under section 10(b) of the Exchange Act apply only with respect to<br />

(i) the purchase or sale of a security l<strong>is</strong>ted on a U.S. stock exchange, or<br />

(ii) the purchase or sale of any other security in the United States. 372 It <strong>is</strong><br />

unclear at present how the holding in th<strong>is</strong> case might be extended to<br />

the broker-dealer reg<strong>is</strong>tration context.<br />

Finally, it should be noted that the derivatives title of Dodd-Frank<br />

amends section 30 of the Exchange Act to add the following:<br />

(c) No prov<strong>is</strong>ion of th<strong>is</strong> title that was added by the Wall Street<br />

Transparency and Accountability Act of 2010, or any rule or<br />

regulation thereunder, shall apply to any person insofar as<br />

such person transacts a business in security-based swaps without<br />

the jur<strong>is</strong>diction of the United States, unless such person<br />

transacts such business in contravention of such rules and<br />

regulations as the Comm<strong>is</strong>sion may prescribe as necessary<br />

or appropriate to prevent the evasion of any prov<strong>is</strong>ion of th<strong>is</strong><br />

title that was added by the Wall Street Transparency and<br />

Accountability Act of 2010. Th<strong>is</strong> subsection shall not be construed<br />

to limit the jur<strong>is</strong>diction of the Comm<strong>is</strong>sion under any<br />

prov<strong>is</strong>ion of th<strong>is</strong> title, as in effect prior to the date of enactment<br />

of the Wall Street Transparency and Accountability Act of<br />

2010. 373<br />

At the present time, the full extraterritorial reach of Dodd-Frank<br />

remains unclear.<br />

370. See Rule 15a-6 Adopting Release, supra note 28, at 13.<br />

371. See, e.g., Dilworth Capital Management LLC, SEC Denial of No-Action<br />

Request (Dec. 9, 2004).<br />

372. Morr<strong>is</strong>on v. Nat’l Australia Bank Ltd., 561 U.S. ___, slip op. No. 08-1191<br />

(June 24, 2010).<br />

373. Exchange Act § 30, as amended by Dodd-Frank § 772.<br />

1A–84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!