25.12.2012 Views

What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell

What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell

What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

§ 1A:7.2 BROKER-DEALER REGULATION<br />

Exchange Act Rule 15a-6, which was adopted in 1989, provides the<br />

principal bas<strong>is</strong> upon which non-U.S. broker-dealers having contact<br />

with specified persons in the United States operate without reg<strong>is</strong>tration<br />

under the Exchange Act. However, prior to adopting Rule 15a-6,<br />

the SEC <strong>is</strong>sued a number of no-action letters and other guidance<br />

covering various fact patterns that can still be viewed as useful<br />

precedents.<br />

In 1964, the SEC provided an exemption to foreign broker-dealers<br />

who perform limited functions as underwriters in foreign jur<strong>is</strong>dictions<br />

in a d<strong>is</strong>tribution of U.S. securities being made both abroad and in the<br />

United States. 357 In 1976, the SEC gave no-action relief to a foreign<br />

broker-dealer who executed its customers’ orders for U.S. securities<br />

through a Reg<strong>is</strong>tered <strong>Broker</strong>-<strong>Dealer</strong> and had no other contacts with the<br />

U.S. customers. 358 In 1981, the SEC permitted a foreign broker-dealer<br />

to prepare research for d<strong>is</strong>tribution into the United States through a<br />

Reg<strong>is</strong>tered <strong>Broker</strong>-<strong>Dealer</strong> who d<strong>is</strong>seminated research under its own<br />

name and had the primary relationship with U.S. customers on<br />

transactions of the researched securities. 359 In 1985, the SEC provided<br />

no-action relief to a Canadian broker-dealer that proposed to execute<br />

unsolicited orders for U.S. broker-dealers and investment adv<strong>is</strong>ers<br />

acting on behalf of their U.S. customers. 360 In 1987, the SEC staff<br />

<strong>is</strong>sued no-action relief to foreign broker-dealers that were members of<br />

the Citicorp financial organization that effectively would have let the<br />

foreign broker-dealer act as a market maker on Nasdaq through the use<br />

of a company that was a Reg<strong>is</strong>tered <strong>Broker</strong>-<strong>Dealer</strong>. 361 The SEC also<br />

<strong>is</strong>sued several no-action letters to exempt foreign affiliates of U.S.<br />

357. The condition for the exemption was that the foreign broker-dealer limited<br />

its activities to (i) taking down securities which he sold outside the<br />

jur<strong>is</strong>diction of the United States to persons other than American nationals,<br />

and (ii) participating solely through h<strong>is</strong> membership in the underwriting<br />

syndicate in activities of the syndicate in the United States, such as sales to<br />

selling group members, stabilizing, over-allotment, and group sales, which<br />

activities were carried out for the syndicate by a managing underwriter or<br />

underwriters who were reg<strong>is</strong>tered with the SEC. See Reg<strong>is</strong>tration of Foreign<br />

Offerings by Domestic Issuers; Reg<strong>is</strong>tration of Underwriters of Foreign<br />

Offerings as <strong>Broker</strong>-<strong>Dealer</strong>s, SEC Release Nos. 33-4708, 34-7366 (July 9,<br />

1964).<br />

358. Bear Stearns & Company, SEC No-Action Letter (Feb. 6, 1976). The letter<br />

was silent on U.S. customer orders for foreign securities.<br />

359. Scrimgeour, Kemp-Gee & Company, SEC No-Action Letter (June 25,<br />

1981).<br />

360. Wood Gundy, Inc., SEC No-Action Letter (Dec. 9, 1985).<br />

361. See Debevo<strong>is</strong>e & Plimpton, SEC No-Action Letter (Aug. 13, 1986);<br />

Debevo<strong>is</strong>e & Plimpton, SEC No-Action Letter (Aug. 17, 1987).<br />

1A–82

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!