25.12.2012 Views

What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell

What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell

What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

§ 1A:5 BROKER-DEALER REGULATION<br />

security future or any put, call, straddle, option, or privilege on any<br />

security future. 320<br />

Under the regulatory framework establ<strong>is</strong>hed by the CFMA, futures<br />

contracts on exempted securities or on broad-based security indices 321<br />

are subject to the sole jur<strong>is</strong>diction of the CFTC, and security futures<br />

(including futures contracts on individual securities or narrow-based<br />

security indices) are jointly regulated by the CFTC and the SEC. 322<br />

<strong>Broker</strong>-dealers who transact security futures must reg<strong>is</strong>ter with both<br />

the SEC and the CFTC. 323<br />

§ 1A:5 Exempted Securities<br />

§ 1A:5.1 Generally<br />

“Exempted securities” under the Exchange Act, as defined in<br />

section 3(a)(12), include, among others, government securities and<br />

municipal securities. 324 However, section 3(a)(12)(B)(ii) provides that<br />

for purposes of section 15 of the Exchange Act, which requires<br />

reg<strong>is</strong>tration of “brokers” and “dealers,” municipal securities are not<br />

“exempted securities.”<br />

<strong>Broker</strong>-dealers transacting exclusively in exempted securities are<br />

exempted from some prov<strong>is</strong>ions of the Exchange Act, but they are still<br />

subject to the anti-fraud and anti-manipulation prov<strong>is</strong>ions of the<br />

Exchange Act. 325<br />

320. See Exchange Act § 3(a)(56); CEA § 1a(32).<br />

321. The term “broad-based security index” <strong>is</strong> not defined in either the CEA or<br />

the Exchange Act. The term refers to a security index that <strong>is</strong> not a narrowbased<br />

security index. See SEC Release No. 34-44288 n.8 (May 10, 2001).<br />

322. See id.<br />

323. Federal law permits firms already reg<strong>is</strong>tered with either the SEC or the<br />

CFTC to reg<strong>is</strong>ter with the other agency, for the limited purpose of trading<br />

security futures, by filing a notice. SEC Guide to <strong>Broker</strong>-<strong>Dealer</strong> Reg<strong>is</strong>tration,<br />

supra note 72; see CEA § 6f(a)(2); Exchange Act § 15(b)(11);<br />

Rule 15b11-1; SEC Release No. 34-44731 (Aug. 21, 2001); SEC Release<br />

No. 34-44730 (effective Aug. 27, 2001); 66 Fed. Reg. 43,080 (Aug. 17,<br />

2001).<br />

324. See Exchange Act § 3(a)(12). Exempted securities under the Exchange Act<br />

should not be confused with those exempted securities under the Securities<br />

Act. “Exempted securities” under the Securities Act are defined in<br />

Securities Act § 3(a). <strong>Broker</strong>s or dealers who engage exclusively in transactions<br />

with respect to securities exempted from reg<strong>is</strong>tration under the<br />

Securities Act that are not also exempted securities under the Exchange<br />

Act would be required to reg<strong>is</strong>ter as such under Section 15 of the Exchange<br />

Act, absent some applicable exemption. See O. Wertheim, SEC Denial of<br />

No-Action Letter (Feb. 12, 1973).<br />

325. See, e.g., Exchange Act §§ 15(c)(1) and (2), 10(b). Anti-fraud prov<strong>is</strong>ions<br />

under Exchange Act § 9(a), however, do not apply to exempted securities.<br />

See Exchange Act § 9(f).<br />

1A–76

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!