25.12.2012 Views

What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell

What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell

What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>What</strong> Is a <strong>Broker</strong>-<strong>Dealer</strong>? § 1A:4.3<br />

encompasses instruments with widely varying character<strong>is</strong>tics, depending<br />

on whether <strong>is</strong>sued in consumer context or in some other investment<br />

context. 269 The U.S. Supreme Court, in Reves v. Ernst & Young,<br />

has adopted a specialized test—the “family resemblance” test—to<br />

determine whether a “note” <strong>is</strong> a security. 270 Whether a given note <strong>is</strong><br />

or <strong>is</strong> not a “security” <strong>is</strong> a matter that requires specific analys<strong>is</strong>.<br />

Under the “family resemblance” test, courts presume that every<br />

“note” <strong>is</strong> a “security.” 271 Th<strong>is</strong> presumption may be rebutted only by a<br />

showing that the note bears a strong resemblance to one of the<br />

enumerated categories of instrument on a judicially developed l<strong>is</strong>t of<br />

exceptions from the rule. 272 If an instrument <strong>is</strong> not sufficiently similar<br />

to an item on the l<strong>is</strong>t, courts will decide whether another category<br />

should be added to the l<strong>is</strong>t. 273<br />

The Supreme Court in Reves adopted the l<strong>is</strong>t created by the Second<br />

Circuit. 274 The Second Circuit’s l<strong>is</strong>t includes instruments commonly<br />

denominated “notes” that nonetheless fall outside of the “security”<br />

category, such as:<br />

(i) a note delivered in consumer financing;<br />

(ii) a note secured by a mortgage on a home;<br />

(iii) a short-term note secured by a lien on a small business or<br />

some of its assets;<br />

(iv) a note evidencing a character loan to a bank customer;<br />

(v) a short-term note secured by an assignment of accounts<br />

receivable;<br />

(vi) a note which simply formalizes an open-account debt incurred<br />

in the ordinary course of business (particularly if, as in the case<br />

of the customer of a broker, it <strong>is</strong> collateralized); and<br />

securities laws apply. Th<strong>is</strong> would clearly be the case when the underlying<br />

transaction embodies some of the significant character<strong>is</strong>tics typically<br />

associated with the named instrument. See United Hous. Found., 421<br />

U.S. 850.<br />

269. See Landreth Timber Co. v. Landreth et al., 471 U.S. 681, 694 (1985). An<br />

investor cannot justifiably assume that a sale of a note <strong>is</strong> covered by the<br />

securities laws, because not all notes involve investments. See Reves, 494<br />

U.S. 56.<br />

270. Reves, 494 U.S. 56.<br />

271. Id.<br />

272. Id. If an instrument bearing the name “note” does not meet the family<br />

resemblance test, it can still be security if it meets the Howey test and falls<br />

under the category of “investment contract.”<br />

273. Id.<br />

274. Reves, 494 U.S. 56.<br />

(<strong>Broker</strong>-<strong>Dealer</strong> Reg., Rel. #9, 9/10)<br />

1A–61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!