25.12.2012 Views

What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell

What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell

What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>What</strong> Is a <strong>Broker</strong>-<strong>Dealer</strong>? § 1A:2.6<br />

(i) the transaction and its related activities are one-time extraordinary<br />

events;<br />

(ii) the call center personnel are compensated on an hourly or<br />

salaried bas<strong>is</strong>;<br />

(iii) the activities of the call center personnel are strictly limited<br />

and superv<strong>is</strong>ed;<br />

(iv) the call center personnel do not handle customer funds and<br />

securities in connection with the activities d<strong>is</strong>cussed; and<br />

(v) the call center personnel do not d<strong>is</strong>cuss the potential value of<br />

the stock, make recommendations to the policyholders regarding<br />

the transaction, or solicit policyholders except to answer<br />

questions. 123<br />

[E] Bulletin Boards<br />

The SEC staff has considered the application of the broker-dealer<br />

reg<strong>is</strong>tration requirements to bulletin boards for an <strong>is</strong>suer’s stock,<br />

including bulletin boards set up by a company to facilitate trading in<br />

its own stock, and bulletin boards operated by an unaffiliated third<br />

party 124 for the securities of multiple companies. 125 In determining<br />

whether the operator of a bulletin board must reg<strong>is</strong>ter as a brokerdealer,<br />

the SEC has considered the same factors used in deciding<br />

whether a person <strong>is</strong> a broker d<strong>is</strong>cussed above. The SEC has given noaction<br />

relief to a company with “passive bulletin board systems” that<br />

provide information to prospective sellers and buyers of the company’s<br />

securities, provided that:<br />

(i) no transactions would be effected by the systems themselves;<br />

(ii) the companies would have no role in effecting transactions<br />

between participants; and<br />

123. Anthem Insurance Co., SEC No-Action Letter (Oct. 25, 2001); Principal<br />

Mutual Holding Co., SEC No-Action Letter (Oct. 9, 2001); Phoenix Home<br />

Life Mutual Insurance Co., SEC No-Action Letter (May 31, 2001); John<br />

Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co., SEC No-Action Letter (Nov. 1, 1999).<br />

124. See, e.g., Portland Brewing Co., SEC No-Action Letter (Dec. 14, 1999);<br />

Flamemaster Corp., SEC No-Action Letter (Oct. 29, 1996); Real Goods<br />

Trading Corp., SEC No-Action Letter (June 24, 1996).<br />

125. See, e.g., Letter from Catherine McGuire, Chief Counsel, Div<strong>is</strong>ion of<br />

Market Regulation to Lori Livingston, Transfer Online, Inc. (May 13,<br />

2000); Investex Investment Exchange Inc., SEC No-Action Letter<br />

(Apr. 9, 1990); Petroleum Information Corp., SEC No-Action Letter<br />

(Nov. 28, 1989).<br />

(<strong>Broker</strong>-<strong>Dealer</strong> Reg., Rel. #9, 9/10)<br />

1A–31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!