25.12.2012 Views

What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell

What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell

What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>What</strong> Is a <strong>Broker</strong>-<strong>Dealer</strong>? § 1A:2.6<br />

[D][2] Associated Persons of Issuers<br />

Frequently, <strong>is</strong>suers sell their own securities through their directors,<br />

officers and employees rather than using a Reg<strong>is</strong>tered <strong>Broker</strong>-<strong>Dealer</strong>.<br />

Even though the <strong>is</strong>suer itself usually does not have to reg<strong>is</strong>ter as a<br />

broker because it <strong>is</strong> not selling for the account of others, directors,<br />

officers or employees of the <strong>is</strong>suer, who act on behalf of the <strong>is</strong>suer in<br />

d<strong>is</strong>tributing its securities may, depending on the circumstances, be<br />

brokers under the Exchange Act. 108 Section 15(a)(1) requires a brokerdealer<br />

that <strong>is</strong> a natural person not associated with a broker-dealer<br />

(which <strong>is</strong> a person other than a natural person) to reg<strong>is</strong>ter with the<br />

SEC. 109 Directors, officers or employees of an <strong>is</strong>suer, therefore, will<br />

have to reg<strong>is</strong>ter under section 15 if they are considered to be brokers.<br />

Although the determination of whether a director, officer, or employee<br />

needs to reg<strong>is</strong>ter under section 15 <strong>is</strong> fact-specific, courts and the<br />

SEC have identified the following factors as relevant:<br />

• the director, officer, or employee’s prior securities activities:<br />

whether the person <strong>is</strong> a reg<strong>is</strong>tered representative of a Reg<strong>is</strong>tered<br />

<strong>Broker</strong>-<strong>Dealer</strong> or whether the person has been engaged in a<br />

professional capacity in buying and selling securities;<br />

• whether the director, officer, or employee was hired to participate<br />

in the offering, and whether each has substantial duties<br />

other than selling shares;<br />

• the method of compensation, whether the person receives,<br />

directly or indirectly, compensation based upon success in<br />

placing securities or the amount of funds ra<strong>is</strong>ed through the<br />

sale of securities;<br />

• the director, officer, or employee’s intention to remain with the<br />

<strong>is</strong>suer after the conclusion of the offering (whether or not the<br />

offering <strong>is</strong> successful) and the likelihood of participation in<br />

other offerings by the same or another <strong>is</strong>suer. 110<br />

108. See SEC Release No. 34-13195 (Jan. 21, 1977).<br />

109. See Exchange Act § 15(a)(1).<br />

110. See Midland-Guardian Co., SEC No-Action Letter (Dec. 27, 1978); North<br />

Albuquerque Associates, SEC No-Action Letter (Aug. 18, 1978); China<br />

Trade Corp., SEC No-Action Letter (July 24, 1978); ITT Financial Corp.,<br />

SEC No-Action Letter (July 17, 1978); Scotch Investments, Ltd. No-Action<br />

Letter (Oct. 12, 1975); Corporate Investment Co., SEC No-Action Letter<br />

(Apr. 20, 1974); Altman Homes, Inc., SEC No-Action Letter (Mar. 2,<br />

1974); Stratford Texas, Inc., SEC No-Action Letter (Nov. 6, 1972); Woodmoor<br />

Corp., SEC No-Action Letter (Mar. 5, 1972); Landcom, Inc.,<br />

SEC No-Action Letter (June 5, 1971); Choice Communities, Inc., SEC<br />

No-Action Letter (Dec. 29, 1972); see also SEC v. Bravata, Civil Action<br />

(<strong>Broker</strong>-<strong>Dealer</strong> Reg., Rel. #9, 9/10)<br />

1A–27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!