What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell
What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell
What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>What</strong> Is a <strong>Broker</strong>-<strong>Dealer</strong>? § 1A:2.6<br />
[D][2] Associated Persons of Issuers<br />
Frequently, <strong>is</strong>suers sell their own securities through their directors,<br />
officers and employees rather than using a Reg<strong>is</strong>tered <strong>Broker</strong>-<strong>Dealer</strong>.<br />
Even though the <strong>is</strong>suer itself usually does not have to reg<strong>is</strong>ter as a<br />
broker because it <strong>is</strong> not selling for the account of others, directors,<br />
officers or employees of the <strong>is</strong>suer, who act on behalf of the <strong>is</strong>suer in<br />
d<strong>is</strong>tributing its securities may, depending on the circumstances, be<br />
brokers under the Exchange Act. 108 Section 15(a)(1) requires a brokerdealer<br />
that <strong>is</strong> a natural person not associated with a broker-dealer<br />
(which <strong>is</strong> a person other than a natural person) to reg<strong>is</strong>ter with the<br />
SEC. 109 Directors, officers or employees of an <strong>is</strong>suer, therefore, will<br />
have to reg<strong>is</strong>ter under section 15 if they are considered to be brokers.<br />
Although the determination of whether a director, officer, or employee<br />
needs to reg<strong>is</strong>ter under section 15 <strong>is</strong> fact-specific, courts and the<br />
SEC have identified the following factors as relevant:<br />
• the director, officer, or employee’s prior securities activities:<br />
whether the person <strong>is</strong> a reg<strong>is</strong>tered representative of a Reg<strong>is</strong>tered<br />
<strong>Broker</strong>-<strong>Dealer</strong> or whether the person has been engaged in a<br />
professional capacity in buying and selling securities;<br />
• whether the director, officer, or employee was hired to participate<br />
in the offering, and whether each has substantial duties<br />
other than selling shares;<br />
• the method of compensation, whether the person receives,<br />
directly or indirectly, compensation based upon success in<br />
placing securities or the amount of funds ra<strong>is</strong>ed through the<br />
sale of securities;<br />
• the director, officer, or employee’s intention to remain with the<br />
<strong>is</strong>suer after the conclusion of the offering (whether or not the<br />
offering <strong>is</strong> successful) and the likelihood of participation in<br />
other offerings by the same or another <strong>is</strong>suer. 110<br />
108. See SEC Release No. 34-13195 (Jan. 21, 1977).<br />
109. See Exchange Act § 15(a)(1).<br />
110. See Midland-Guardian Co., SEC No-Action Letter (Dec. 27, 1978); North<br />
Albuquerque Associates, SEC No-Action Letter (Aug. 18, 1978); China<br />
Trade Corp., SEC No-Action Letter (July 24, 1978); ITT Financial Corp.,<br />
SEC No-Action Letter (July 17, 1978); Scotch Investments, Ltd. No-Action<br />
Letter (Oct. 12, 1975); Corporate Investment Co., SEC No-Action Letter<br />
(Apr. 20, 1974); Altman Homes, Inc., SEC No-Action Letter (Mar. 2,<br />
1974); Stratford Texas, Inc., SEC No-Action Letter (Nov. 6, 1972); Woodmoor<br />
Corp., SEC No-Action Letter (Mar. 5, 1972); Landcom, Inc.,<br />
SEC No-Action Letter (June 5, 1971); Choice Communities, Inc., SEC<br />
No-Action Letter (Dec. 29, 1972); see also SEC v. Bravata, Civil Action<br />
(<strong>Broker</strong>-<strong>Dealer</strong> Reg., Rel. #9, 9/10)<br />
1A–27