What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell
What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell
What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>What</strong> Is a <strong>Broker</strong>-<strong>Dealer</strong>? § 1A:2.6<br />
receiving only a flat fee), may not have to reg<strong>is</strong>ter as a broker. 79<br />
However, if the M&A adv<strong>is</strong>er solicits potential investors or participates<br />
in the negotiation of the <strong>is</strong>suance or exchange of securities and<br />
receives a transaction-based fee, the adv<strong>is</strong>or may have to reg<strong>is</strong>ter as<br />
a broker-dealer. 80 A key determining factor <strong>is</strong> whether the M&A<br />
adv<strong>is</strong>er receives transaction-based compensation. 81<br />
Naturally, if the transaction involves only a sale of non-securities<br />
assets and/or assumption of liabilities, no broker-dealer reg<strong>is</strong>tration<br />
<strong>is</strong>sue would be presented.<br />
[B][3] Business <strong>Broker</strong>s<br />
Business brokers have developed as a special case because for many<br />
years there was an open question as to whether sale of a business<br />
through conveying all the shares was a securities transaction. However,<br />
in 1985, the U.S. Supreme Court held that th<strong>is</strong> type of transaction<br />
involves a sale of securities. 82<br />
A business broker usually receives comm<strong>is</strong>sions in connection with<br />
the sale of a commercial firm. 83 A business broker will not have to<br />
reg<strong>is</strong>ter as a broker-dealer if there <strong>is</strong> no d<strong>is</strong>tribution, sale or exchange of<br />
securities. 84 However, if the sale of companies engaged by the business<br />
broker includes a transfer of securities, the business broker may have<br />
to reg<strong>is</strong>ter as a broker-dealer if he <strong>is</strong> engaged in the business of effecting<br />
79. Victoria Bancroft, SEC No-Action Letter (July 9, 1987); Russell R. Miller<br />
& Co., Inc., SEC No-Action Letter (July 14, 1977); May-Pac Management<br />
Co., SEC No-Action Letter (Dec. 20, 1973); Ruth H. Quigley, SEC<br />
No-Action Letter (July 14, 1973); Corporate Forum, Inc., SEC<br />
No-Action Letter (Dec. 10, 1972).<br />
80. Dominion Resources, Inc., SEC Revocation of No-Action Letter (Mar. 7,<br />
2000) (the SEC withdrew a prior letter dated August 22, 1985, granting<br />
no-action relief to Dominion Resources, Inc. for the same activities; the<br />
staff clarified its position which <strong>is</strong> cons<strong>is</strong>tent with that in the following<br />
no-action letters) ; John R. Wirthlin, SEC Denial of No-Action Request<br />
(Jan. 19, 1999); Davenport Management, Inc., SEC No-Action Letter<br />
(Apr. 13, 1993); C&W Portfolio Management, Inc. SEC Denial of<br />
No-Action Request (July 20, 1989); May-Pac Management Co., SEC<br />
No-Action Letter (Dec. 20, 1973); Ruth H. Quigley, SEC No-Action<br />
Letter (July 14, 1973); Fulham & Co., Inc., SEC No-Action Letter<br />
(Dec. 20, 1972).<br />
81. See Hallmark Capital Corp., SEC No-Action Letter (June 11, 2007).<br />
82. See Landreth Timber Co. v. Landreth, 471 U.S. 681 (1985). In some cases,<br />
the sale of a business would involve the transfer of corporate assets without<br />
any transfer of stock by individual shareholders of the selling corporation;<br />
in other cases, the sale may involve the transfer of 100 percent of the<br />
outstanding stock by current shareholders to the purchasers.<br />
83. See Pleger, Gary L., Esq./Pleger, Duderwicz & Prince, SEC No-Action<br />
Letter (Oct. 11, 1977).<br />
84. See id.; Hallmark Capital Corp., SEC No-Action Letter (June 11, 2007).<br />
(<strong>Broker</strong>-<strong>Dealer</strong> Reg., Rel. #9, 9/10)<br />
1A–21