25.12.2012 Views

What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell

What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell

What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

§ 1A:2.6 BROKER-DEALER REGULATION<br />

[B][2] M&A Adv<strong>is</strong>ers<br />

Persons engaged in merger and acqu<strong>is</strong>ition activities are subject to<br />

the broker reg<strong>is</strong>tration requirements when these activities involve, for<br />

example, a sale or exchange of securities. 74 Whether an intermediary<br />

in an M&A transaction would be considered to be a broker depends on<br />

the prec<strong>is</strong>e nature of the services performed. 75 The expectations or<br />

subjective understandings of the parties as to the role of the intermediary<br />

are not relevant. The SEC has taken the position that<br />

individuals who do nothing more than bring merger- or acqu<strong>is</strong>itionminded<br />

people or entities together, and do not participate in negotiations<br />

or settlements between them, may not be brokers in securities or<br />

subject to the reg<strong>is</strong>tration requirements of section 15 of the Exchange<br />

Act—especially where their compensation does not depend upon the<br />

size or success of the transaction. 76 On the other hand, persons (other<br />

than professionals such as lawyers or accountants acting as such) who<br />

participate in or otherw<strong>is</strong>e facilitate negotiations in effecting mergers<br />

or acqu<strong>is</strong>itions, and receive transaction-based compensation, are<br />

required to reg<strong>is</strong>ter as broker-dealers. 77 In addition, the activities of<br />

an intermediary in ra<strong>is</strong>ing venture capital by soliciting investors may<br />

constitute an independent bas<strong>is</strong>, apart from the intermediary’s activities<br />

in corporate mergers and acqu<strong>is</strong>itions, for requiring reg<strong>is</strong>tration<br />

with the SEC as a broker-dealer. 78<br />

The analys<strong>is</strong> under section 15 for an M&A adv<strong>is</strong>er <strong>is</strong>, therefore,<br />

similar to that for a finder. An M&A adv<strong>is</strong>er, who acts as a “finder” by<br />

merely identifying and locating M&A prospects and bringing together<br />

buyers and sellers, and not participating directly or indirectly in the<br />

sale of securities nor sharing in any profits realized (for example,<br />

74. Garrett/Kushell/Assocs., SEC No-Action Letter (Sept. 7, 1980).<br />

75. Henry C. Coppelt d/b/a May Pac Management Co., SEC No-Action Letter<br />

(June 2, 1974); SEC v. Randy, 38 F. Supp. 2d 657, 667 (N.D. Ill. 1999).<br />

76. Garrett/Kushell/Assocs., SEC No-Action Letter (Sept. 7, 1980); IMF Corp.,<br />

SEC No-Action Letter (May 15, 1979); Henry C. Coppelt d/b/a May Pac<br />

Management Co., SEC No-Action Letter (June 2, 1974).<br />

77. John R. Wirthlin, SEC Denial of No-Action Request (Jan. 19, 1999);<br />

Davenport Management, Inc., SEC No-Action Letter (Apr. 13, 1993);<br />

C&W Portfolio Management, Inc. SEC Denial of No-Action Request<br />

(July 20, 1989); Garrett/Kushell/Assocs., SEC No-Action Letter (Sept. 7,<br />

1980); IMF Corp., SEC No-Action Letter (May 15, 1979); Equity Development<br />

Corp., SEC No-Action Letter (Dec. 10, 1976); Henry C. Coppelt<br />

d/b/a May Pac Management Co., SEC No-Action Letter (June 2, 1974);<br />

see also SEC v. Michael R. Milken and MC Group, 98 Civ. 1398 (S.D.N.Y.<br />

Feb. 26, 1998).<br />

78. Henry C. Coppelt d/b/a May Pac Management Co., SEC No-Action Letter<br />

(June 2, 1974).<br />

1A–20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!