25.12.2012 Views

What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell

What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell

What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>What</strong> Is a <strong>Broker</strong>-<strong>Dealer</strong>? § 1A:8.3<br />

(iii) he or she <strong>is</strong> in the class of persons the Exchange Act was<br />

designed to protect. 484<br />

The plaintiff must demonstrate a direct relationship between the<br />

violation at <strong>is</strong>sue and the performance of the contract; that <strong>is</strong>, the<br />

violation must be inseparable from the performance of the contract<br />

rather than collateral or tangential to the contract. 485 If an agreement<br />

cannot be performed without violating the securities laws, that agreement<br />

<strong>is</strong> subject to resc<strong>is</strong>sion under section 29(b). 486<br />

As d<strong>is</strong>cussed in supra section 1A:1, states have their own reg<strong>is</strong>tration<br />

requirements for broker-dealers doing business within the state.<br />

Many states’ securities laws have prov<strong>is</strong>ions modeled on section 29 of<br />

the Exchange Act, which allow parties to rescind contracts with<br />

unreg<strong>is</strong>tered broker-dealers. 487<br />

§ 1A:8.3 Concerns for Controlling Persons<br />

Section 20 of the Exchange Act imposes liabilities on controlling<br />

persons and persons who aid and abet anyone in violation of the<br />

Exchange Act. Under section 20(a), every person who, directly or<br />

indirectly, controls any person liable under any prov<strong>is</strong>ion of the<br />

Exchange Act or of any rule or regulation thereunder shall also be<br />

liable jointly and severally with and to the same extent as such<br />

controlled person to any person to whom such controlled person <strong>is</strong><br />

liable, unless the controlling person acted in good faith and did not<br />

directly or indirectly induce the act or acts constituting the violation or<br />

cause of action. Under section 20(e), any person that knowingly<br />

provides substantial ass<strong>is</strong>tance to another person in violation of the<br />

Exchange Act, or of any rule or regulation thereunder, shall be deemed<br />

to be in violation of such prov<strong>is</strong>ion to the same extent as the person to<br />

whom such ass<strong>is</strong>tance <strong>is</strong> provided.<br />

Pursuant to sections 21(d)(1), (3) and (5) of the Exchange Act, the<br />

SEC can bring enforcement actions against such controlling persons<br />

484. Regional Props., 678 F.2d 552; Berkeley Inv. Group, Ltd. v. Colkitt, 455<br />

F.3d 195 (3d Cir. 2006).<br />

485. Berkeley Inv. Group, 455 F.3d 195; GFL Advantage Fund, Ltd. v. Colkitt,<br />

272 F.3d 189, 201 (3d Cir. 2001); Salamon v. Teleplus Enters., Fed. Sec. L.<br />

Rep. (CCH) 94,742.<br />

486. Berkeley Inv. Group, 455 F.3d 195.<br />

487. See, e.g., CAL. CORP. CODE § 25501.5 (2009); CONN. GEN. STAT. § 36b-29<br />

(2008); FLA. STAT. § 517.211 (2009); 815 ILCS 5/13 (2009); N.J.S.A. 49:3-71<br />

(a)(2) (2001); TEX. REV. CIV. STAT. art. 581-33 (2009); cf. N.Y. GEN. BUS.<br />

§ 353 (2010) (providing the New York Attorney General with a right to order<br />

restitution of any money or property, but not providing a private right of<br />

action).<br />

(<strong>Broker</strong>-<strong>Dealer</strong> Reg., Rel. #9, 9/10)<br />

1A–109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!