What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell
What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell
What is a Broker-Dealer? - Davis Polk & Wardwell
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>What</strong> Is a <strong>Broker</strong>-<strong>Dealer</strong>? § 1A:8.3<br />
(iii) he or she <strong>is</strong> in the class of persons the Exchange Act was<br />
designed to protect. 484<br />
The plaintiff must demonstrate a direct relationship between the<br />
violation at <strong>is</strong>sue and the performance of the contract; that <strong>is</strong>, the<br />
violation must be inseparable from the performance of the contract<br />
rather than collateral or tangential to the contract. 485 If an agreement<br />
cannot be performed without violating the securities laws, that agreement<br />
<strong>is</strong> subject to resc<strong>is</strong>sion under section 29(b). 486<br />
As d<strong>is</strong>cussed in supra section 1A:1, states have their own reg<strong>is</strong>tration<br />
requirements for broker-dealers doing business within the state.<br />
Many states’ securities laws have prov<strong>is</strong>ions modeled on section 29 of<br />
the Exchange Act, which allow parties to rescind contracts with<br />
unreg<strong>is</strong>tered broker-dealers. 487<br />
§ 1A:8.3 Concerns for Controlling Persons<br />
Section 20 of the Exchange Act imposes liabilities on controlling<br />
persons and persons who aid and abet anyone in violation of the<br />
Exchange Act. Under section 20(a), every person who, directly or<br />
indirectly, controls any person liable under any prov<strong>is</strong>ion of the<br />
Exchange Act or of any rule or regulation thereunder shall also be<br />
liable jointly and severally with and to the same extent as such<br />
controlled person to any person to whom such controlled person <strong>is</strong><br />
liable, unless the controlling person acted in good faith and did not<br />
directly or indirectly induce the act or acts constituting the violation or<br />
cause of action. Under section 20(e), any person that knowingly<br />
provides substantial ass<strong>is</strong>tance to another person in violation of the<br />
Exchange Act, or of any rule or regulation thereunder, shall be deemed<br />
to be in violation of such prov<strong>is</strong>ion to the same extent as the person to<br />
whom such ass<strong>is</strong>tance <strong>is</strong> provided.<br />
Pursuant to sections 21(d)(1), (3) and (5) of the Exchange Act, the<br />
SEC can bring enforcement actions against such controlling persons<br />
484. Regional Props., 678 F.2d 552; Berkeley Inv. Group, Ltd. v. Colkitt, 455<br />
F.3d 195 (3d Cir. 2006).<br />
485. Berkeley Inv. Group, 455 F.3d 195; GFL Advantage Fund, Ltd. v. Colkitt,<br />
272 F.3d 189, 201 (3d Cir. 2001); Salamon v. Teleplus Enters., Fed. Sec. L.<br />
Rep. (CCH) 94,742.<br />
486. Berkeley Inv. Group, 455 F.3d 195.<br />
487. See, e.g., CAL. CORP. CODE § 25501.5 (2009); CONN. GEN. STAT. § 36b-29<br />
(2008); FLA. STAT. § 517.211 (2009); 815 ILCS 5/13 (2009); N.J.S.A. 49:3-71<br />
(a)(2) (2001); TEX. REV. CIV. STAT. art. 581-33 (2009); cf. N.Y. GEN. BUS.<br />
§ 353 (2010) (providing the New York Attorney General with a right to order<br />
restitution of any money or property, but not providing a private right of<br />
action).<br />
(<strong>Broker</strong>-<strong>Dealer</strong> Reg., Rel. #9, 9/10)<br />
1A–109