DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES ANNUAL REPORT TO THE ...
DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES ANNUAL REPORT TO THE ... DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES ANNUAL REPORT TO THE ...
OvERvIEw OF AgENCy � PERFORMANCE MANAgEMENT FRAMEwORk Figure 37. Performance Management Framework mission To conserve, sustainably develop and share the use of the State’s aquatic resources and their ecosystems for the benefit of present and future generations. Service 1 – fisheries management Service 2 – compliance and education Service 3 – research and monitoring Service 4 – marine Safety Service Key performance indicators Agency-level outcome Conservation and sustainable development of the State’s fish resources. government goal: outcome-Based Service delivery 61 Ensuring that economic activity is managed in a socially and environmentally responsible manner for the long-term benefit of the State.
OvERvIEw OF AgENCy � PERFORMANCE MANAgEMENT FRAMEwORk measurement of department-level outcome and Services The Department of Fisheries evaluates, measures and reports on the effectiveness and efficiency of its service delivery in achieving its desired department-level outcome through Key Performance Indicators or ‘KPIs’. KPIs comprise both Effectiveness and Efficiency Indicators. Effectiveness Indicators show the extent to which the Department achieved its departmentlevel outcome, while Efficiency Indicators show the relationship between the service delivered and the resources used in the delivery of that service. A summary of the Department’s performance against budget targets is provided in Table 21 below. 62 table 21. Summary of Key Performance Indicators: Actual Performance Compared to Budget targets 2010/11 2010/11 target Actual Outcome: Conservation and sustainable development of the State’s fish resources. Key Effectiveness Indicators The proportion of fish stocks identified as being at risk or vulnerable through exploitation. 17% 6% The proportion of fisheries where acceptable catches (or effort levels) are achieved. 90% 94% The percentage of fisheries or fished sectors 65% where current catch shares are known and where catch share allocations are in process or in place. 61% The gross value of State fisheries production $400m* (million). $380m** The participation rate in recreational fishing. Key Efficiency Indicators Service 1 – Fisheries Management 33% 32% Average cost per hour for management (excluding grants and fisheries adjustments). Service 2 – Compliance and education $109 $152 Average cost per hour for compliance and education. Service 3 – Research and Monitoring $134 $186 Average cost per hour for research and monitoring. Service 4 – Marine Safety Service $116 $126 Average cost per hour for marine safety service. $116 $134 Notes: * See Key Performance Indicator 2.1 (contribution to the State’s gross value of output). ** This is derived from the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics (ABARE) figures for the year 2009/10.
- Page 13 and 14: SUMMARy OF THE yEAR � STOCk STATU
- Page 15 and 16: fishery Stock assessment complete B
- Page 17 and 18: fishery South Coast Bioregion South
- Page 19 and 20: SUMMARy OF THE yEAR � FINANCIAL O
- Page 21 and 22: SUMMARy OF THE yEAR � FINANCIAL O
- Page 23 and 24: SUMMARy OF THE yEAR � FINANCIAL O
- Page 25 and 26: SUMMARy OF THE yEAR � FINANCIAL O
- Page 27 and 28: SUMMARy OF THE yEAR � FINANCIAL O
- Page 29 and 30: SUMMARy OF THE yEAR � FINANCIAL O
- Page 31 and 32: SUMMARy OF THE yEAR � FINANCIAL O
- Page 33 and 34: SUMMARy OF THE yEAR � FINANCIAL O
- Page 35 and 36: SUMMARy OF THE yEAR � FINANCIAL O
- Page 37 and 38: SUMMARy OF THE yEAR � FINANCIAL O
- Page 39 and 40: SUMMARy OF THE yEAR � FINANCIAL O
- Page 41 and 42: SUMMARy OF THE yEAR � FISH PIES (
- Page 43 and 44: SUMMARy OF THE yEAR � FISH PIES (
- Page 45 and 46: SUMMARy OF THE yEAR � FISH PIES (
- Page 47 and 48: Key compliance statistics - 2008/09
- Page 49 and 50: OvERvIEw OF AgENCy In 2010/11 a com
- Page 51 and 52: OvERvIEw OF AgENCy � PROFILE OF T
- Page 53 and 54: OvERvIEw OF AgENCy � PROFILE OF T
- Page 55 and 56: OvERvIEw OF AgENCy � OPERATINg EN
- Page 57 and 58: OvERvIEw OF AgENCy � OPERATIONAL
- Page 59 and 60: OvERvIEw OF AgENCy � CORPORATE Ex
- Page 61 and 62: OvERvIEw OF AgENCy � CORPORATE Ex
- Page 63: OvERvIEw OF AgENCy � PERFORMANCE
- Page 67 and 68: OvERvIEw OF AgENCy � PERFORMANCE
- Page 69 and 70: AgENCy PERFORMANCE � AgENCy PERFO
- Page 71 and 72: AgENCy PERFORMANCE � SERvICE 1 -
- Page 73 and 74: AgENCy PERFORMANCE � SERvICE 1 -
- Page 75 and 76: AgENCy PERFORMANCE � SERvICE 1 -
- Page 77 and 78: AgENCy PERFORMANCE � SERvICE 2 -
- Page 79 and 80: AgENCy PERFORMANCE � SERvICE 2 -
- Page 81 and 82: AgENCy PERFORMANCE � SERvICE 2 -
- Page 83 and 84: AgENCy PERFORMANCE � CASE STUDy 1
- Page 85 and 86: AgENCy PERFORMANCE � CASE STUDy 1
- Page 87 and 88: AgENCy PERFORMANCE � CASE STUDy 2
- Page 89 and 90: AgENCy PERFORMANCE � CASE STUDy 2
- Page 91 and 92: CASE STUDy 3 AgENCy PERFORMANCE �
- Page 93 and 94: AgENCy PERFORMANCE � SERvICE 3 -
- Page 95 and 96: AgENCy PERFORMANCE � SERvICE 3 -
- Page 97 and 98: AgENCy PERFORMANCE � SERvICE 3 -
- Page 99 and 100: AgENCy PERFORMANCE � SERvICE 3 -
- Page 101 and 102: AgENCy PERFORMANCE � CASE STUDy 4
- Page 103 and 104: AgENCy PERFORMANCE � SERvICE 4 -
- Page 105 and 106: AgENCy PERFORMANCE � CORPORATE SE
- Page 107 and 108: AgENCy PERFORMANCE � CORPORATE SE
- Page 109 and 110: DISCLOSURES AND LEgAL COMPLIANCE As
- Page 111 and 112: DISCLOSURES AND LEgAL COMPLIANCE
- Page 113 and 114: DISCLOSURES AND LEgAL COMPLIANCE
OvERvIEw <strong>OF</strong> AgENCy � PERFORMANCE MANAgEMENT FRAMEwORk<br />
measurement of department-level<br />
outcome and Services<br />
The Department of Fisheries evaluates,<br />
measures and reports on the effectiveness and<br />
efficiency of its service delivery in achieving its<br />
desired department-level outcome through Key<br />
Performance Indicators or ‘KPIs’. KPIs comprise both<br />
Effectiveness and Efficiency Indicators.<br />
Effectiveness Indicators show the extent to<br />
which the Department achieved its departmentlevel<br />
outcome, while Efficiency Indicators show the<br />
relationship between the service delivered and the<br />
resources used in the delivery of that service. A<br />
summary of the Department’s performance against<br />
budget targets is provided in Table 21 below.<br />
62<br />
table 21. Summary of Key Performance Indicators:<br />
Actual Performance Compared to<br />
Budget targets<br />
2010/11 2010/11<br />
target Actual<br />
Outcome: Conservation and sustainable development of the State’s<br />
fish resources.<br />
Key Effectiveness Indicators<br />
The proportion of fish stocks identified<br />
as being at risk or vulnerable through<br />
exploitation.<br />
17% 6%<br />
The proportion of fisheries where acceptable<br />
catches (or effort levels) are achieved.<br />
90% 94%<br />
The percentage of fisheries or fished sectors 65%<br />
where current catch shares are known and<br />
where catch share allocations are in process<br />
or in place.<br />
61%<br />
The gross value of State fisheries production $400m*<br />
(million).<br />
$380m**<br />
The participation rate in recreational fishing.<br />
Key Efficiency Indicators<br />
Service 1 – Fisheries Management<br />
33% 32%<br />
Average cost per hour for management<br />
(excluding grants and fisheries adjustments).<br />
Service 2 – Compliance and education<br />
$109 $152<br />
Average cost per hour for compliance<br />
and education.<br />
Service 3 – Research and Monitoring<br />
$134 $186<br />
Average cost per hour for research<br />
and monitoring.<br />
Service 4 – Marine Safety Service<br />
$116 $126<br />
Average cost per hour for marine safety<br />
service.<br />
$116 $134<br />
Notes:<br />
* See Key Performance Indicator 2.1 (contribution to the State’s<br />
gross value of output).<br />
** This is derived from the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and<br />
Resource Economics (ABARE) figures for the year 2009/10.