24.12.2012 Views

Septoria and Stagonospora Diseases of Cereals - CIMMYT ...

Septoria and Stagonospora Diseases of Cereals - CIMMYT ...

Septoria and Stagonospora Diseases of Cereals - CIMMYT ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

66<br />

Session 3B — E. Arseniuk <strong>and</strong> P.C. Czembor<br />

Table 5. Origin <strong>of</strong> <strong>Stagonospora</strong> nodorum isolates.<br />

against mean virulence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

No. Isolate name Host Geographic origin (location)<br />

isolates. Similarly, the variance<br />

1 Lb-2-1 triticale Lubinicko, woj. zielonogórskie<br />

among isolates for virulence to<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

Lb-3-1<br />

Lb-4-1<br />

Z-20-1<br />

triticale<br />

triticale<br />

triticale<br />

Lubinicko, woj. zielonogórskie<br />

Lubinicko, woj. zielonogórskie<br />

Zadabrowie. woj. przemyskie<br />

individual cultivars/lines was<br />

regressed against mean resistance<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

Z-22-1<br />

Gw-3-1<br />

TS87-1-1<br />

triticale<br />

triticale<br />

triticale<br />

Zadabrowie. woj. przemyskie<br />

Grodkowice, woj. krakowskie<br />

Z¸rich, Switzerl<strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> the cultivars/lines expressed on<br />

the 0-9 scale.<br />

8 Wen-1-1 winter wheat Weneda Elblag, woj. torunskie<br />

9<br />

10<br />

Ml-2-1<br />

Ch-9-1<br />

triticale<br />

triticale<br />

Malyszyn, woj. gorzowskie<br />

Choryn, woj. poznanskie Results<br />

11 Wr-6-1 triticale Wrocikowo, woj. olsztynskie<br />

12 Ch90-3-1 triticale Chelm, woj. chelmskie<br />

13 Rd93-1-1 triticale Radzików, woj. warszawskie<br />

All isolates <strong>of</strong> S. nodorum used<br />

14<br />

15<br />

T91-1-4<br />

Lu90-1-1<br />

triticale<br />

triticale<br />

Torun, woj. torunskie<br />

Lucmierz, woj. lódzkie<br />

in the study were pathogenic to<br />

leaves <strong>and</strong> to heads <strong>of</strong> all triticale<br />

<strong>and</strong> bread wheat cultivars (Tables<br />

2, 6, 3, 4). On average, the disease<br />

Table 6. The expression <strong>of</strong> virulence by 15 <strong>Stagonospora</strong> nodorum isolates <strong>and</strong> their mixture (a composite<br />

isolate) on heads <strong>of</strong> 11 winter triticale (t) <strong>and</strong> 4 winter wheat (w) cultivars under field conditions.<br />

on leaves was 2-3 times<br />

more severe than on<br />

No. Isolate<br />

Almo Ugo<br />

(t) (t)<br />

Malno Lasko Grado Dagro Bolero Presto Largo<br />

(t) (t) (t) (t) (t) (t) (t)<br />

LAD-<br />

285 (t)<br />

DAD-<br />

187 (t)<br />

Alba Jawa Begra Liwilla<br />

(w) (w) (w) (w) Mean<br />

heads. Some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

isolates did not cause<br />

1 Lb-2-1 0.7* 0.8 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.4 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.6 1.1 1.8 2.9 2.7 1.8 1.4<br />

disease on heads <strong>of</strong><br />

2 Lb-3-1 1.2 1.0 1.7 1.7 1.7 2.2 1.2 1.5 1.5 2.5 1.6 2.7 3.6 3.6 1.9 2.0 spring triticale genotypes<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

Lb-4-1<br />

Z-20-1<br />

Z-22-1<br />

1.3<br />

0.5<br />

0.9<br />

1.4<br />

0.6<br />

0.8<br />

2.2<br />

0.7<br />

1.1<br />

2.1<br />

0.6<br />

1.2<br />

2.5<br />

1.9<br />

1.2<br />

2.8<br />

1.1<br />

1.8<br />

1.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.8<br />

1.8<br />

0.8<br />

1.3<br />

1.8<br />

0.9<br />

1.0<br />

3.1<br />

1.2<br />

2.1<br />

1.8<br />

0.9<br />

1.6<br />

2.3<br />

1.6<br />

2.3<br />

3.6<br />

2.3<br />

3.2<br />

3.2<br />

2.0<br />

2.9<br />

2.3<br />

1.6<br />

1.9<br />

2.3<br />

1.2<br />

1.6<br />

(Table 4). The lack <strong>of</strong><br />

disease was due to low<br />

6 Gw-3-1 2.1 2.1 3.2 2.7 2.5 3.6 2.1 2.8 2.0 3.5 2.6 4.2 5.2 4.4 3.8 3.1 rainfall <strong>and</strong> drought<br />

7<br />

8<br />

TS87-1-1<br />

Wen-1-1<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

2.1<br />

2.2<br />

3.2<br />

2.7<br />

2.8<br />

2.6<br />

3.3<br />

3.3<br />

3.7<br />

3.4<br />

2.2<br />

1.8<br />

2.8<br />

2.3<br />

2.6<br />

2.2<br />

4.0<br />

3.6<br />

2.5<br />

2.6<br />

3.3<br />

3.4<br />

4.9<br />

4.5<br />

4.1<br />

3.9<br />

3.7<br />

2.7<br />

3.1<br />

2.9<br />

during the summers. In<br />

9 Ml-2-1 0.7 0.6 0.9 0.9 2.3 1.3 0.6 0.6 0.8 1.8 1.0 1.7 2.7 2.2 1.7 1.3 spite <strong>of</strong> the adverse<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

Ch-9-1<br />

Wr-6-1<br />

Ch90-3-1<br />

0.7<br />

1.4<br />

1.4<br />

0.5<br />

1.3<br />

1.3<br />

0.6<br />

1.8<br />

2.2<br />

0.7<br />

1.6<br />

2.3<br />

0.9<br />

1.5<br />

2.8<br />

0.9<br />

2.4<br />

3.2<br />

0.7<br />

1.3<br />

1.5<br />

0.7<br />

1.7<br />

1.8<br />

0.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.6<br />

1.3<br />

2.4<br />

3.1<br />

1.0<br />

1.7<br />

2.1<br />

1.2<br />

2.4<br />

2.7<br />

2.1<br />

3.5<br />

4.3<br />

1.9<br />

3.2<br />

3.3<br />

2.9<br />

2.8<br />

2.6<br />

1.1<br />

2.0<br />

2.4<br />

weather, the same<br />

isolates were able to<br />

13 Rd93-1-1 0.8 0.9 0.8 1.1 2.3 1.8 0.8 1.2 1.1 1.9 1.4 2.1 2.6 2.4 3.6 1.7 cause the disease on<br />

14<br />

15<br />

T91-1-4 0.6<br />

Lu90-1-1 1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.9<br />

1.0<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.5<br />

1.6<br />

1.7<br />

1.7<br />

2.1<br />

0.8<br />

1.0<br />

1.0<br />

1.4<br />

1.1<br />

1.6<br />

1.8<br />

2.6<br />

1.2<br />

1.4<br />

2.1<br />

2.4<br />

2.8<br />

3.5<br />

2.6<br />

2.7<br />

1.8<br />

2.4<br />

1.5<br />

1.9<br />

heads <strong>of</strong> more SNB<br />

16 Mixture 1.1 1.3 2.4 2.3 2.4 3.0 1.6 1.7 2.1 2.6 1.7 2.7 4.0 3.3 2.8 2.3 susceptible wheat<br />

Mean 1.1 1.1 1.7 1.7 2.1 2.3 1.2 1.5 1.4 2.4 1.6 2.4 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 cultivars.<br />

LSD0.01 = 0.141 - for virulence <strong>of</strong> isolates on heads; LSD0.01 = 0.136 for reaction <strong>of</strong> cultivars on heads.<br />

* Mean score on a 0-9 scale <strong>of</strong> 3 SNB scorings per season ¥ 6 blocks over 3 growing seasons.<br />

Due to a large<br />

number degrees <strong>of</strong> freedom <strong>and</strong><br />

Table 7. Analysis <strong>of</strong> variance for the amount <strong>of</strong> SNB on leaves <strong>and</strong> heads <strong>of</strong> 5 spring triticale low error values, most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>and</strong> 3 spring wheat cultivars scored on a 0-9 digit scale (0 = resistant, 9 = susceptible) under<br />

field conditions.<br />

Leaves Heads<br />

Source <strong>of</strong> Mean F Proba- Mean F Probavariation<br />

D. f. Square value bility D. f. Square value bility<br />

sources <strong>of</strong> variation included in the<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> variance (Tables 1 <strong>and</strong> 7)<br />

proved to be significant. The main<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> cultivars <strong>and</strong> isolates<br />

Blocks (B) 4 844.03 18.13 0.01 4 13.17 1.84 0.28<br />

were highly significant. It is<br />

Scoring dates (R.d.) 3 1553.60 33.37 0.00 1 39.55 5.52 0.08 noticeable that the effect <strong>of</strong> isolates<br />

Error (B × S.d.)<br />

Cultivars (C)<br />

Isolates (I)<br />

12<br />

7<br />

15<br />

46.56<br />

193.32<br />

11.3<br />

272.50<br />

15.65<br />

0.00<br />

0.00<br />

4<br />

7<br />

15<br />

7.17<br />

238.49<br />

4.58<br />

552.86<br />

10.62<br />

0.00<br />

0.00<br />

was smaller than that <strong>of</strong> cultivars.<br />

This would indicate that the<br />

C × I<br />

S.d. × C<br />

S.d. × I<br />

105<br />

21<br />

45<br />

0.636<br />

4.95<br />

0.693<br />

0.90<br />

6.97<br />

0.98<br />

0.76<br />

0.00<br />

0.51<br />

105<br />

7<br />

15<br />

0.71<br />

2.55<br />

0.167<br />

1.65<br />

5.91<br />

0.39<br />

0.01<br />

0.00<br />

0.98<br />

reaction <strong>of</strong> cultivars to inoculation<br />

with different isolates <strong>of</strong> S. nodorum<br />

S.d. × I × C<br />

Error (B×S.d.×C×I)<br />

315<br />

2032<br />

0.239<br />

0.709<br />

0.34 0.00 105<br />

1016<br />

0.129<br />

0.431<br />

0.30 1.00 was determined mainly by the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!