Septoria and Stagonospora Diseases of Cereals - CIMMYT ...
Septoria and Stagonospora Diseases of Cereals - CIMMYT ...
Septoria and Stagonospora Diseases of Cereals - CIMMYT ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
20<br />
Session 1 — A.L. Scharen<br />
Table 1. Classification <strong>and</strong> nomenclature <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Septoria</strong> spp. <strong>and</strong> <strong>Stagonospora</strong> spp. fungi on small grain cereals. a<br />
Genus Teleomorph Anamorph Common name Host<br />
<strong>Septoria</strong> spp. Mycosphaerella <strong>Septoria</strong> tritici <strong>Septoria</strong> tritici Wheat<br />
graminicola blotch <strong>of</strong> wheat<br />
1998; Shaw <strong>and</strong> Royle, 1989). The<br />
anamorphic conidia, also called<br />
pycnidiospores, are most important<br />
as secondary inoculum locally as<br />
the crop is growing <strong>and</strong> are<br />
disseminated mainly by rain<br />
splash.<br />
Sources <strong>of</strong> primary inoculum in<br />
areas where the teleomorph is not<br />
known remain a matter <strong>of</strong><br />
controversy <strong>and</strong> speculation,<br />
particularly in the case <strong>of</strong> septoria<br />
tritici blotch. Both S. nodorum <strong>and</strong><br />
S. tritici are found parasitizing a<br />
wide range <strong>of</strong> graminaceous hosts.<br />
(Krupinsky, 1994; Sprague, 1950).<br />
Several species <strong>of</strong> grasses have<br />
been suspected as alternative hosts<br />
<strong>and</strong> inoculum sources, but the<br />
question is yet unresolved. Conidia<br />
from plant debris may act as<br />
primary inoculum for disease<br />
development in some cases. The<br />
fact remains to puzzle us that no<br />
case has been reported in which<br />
septoria tritici blotch <strong>and</strong>/or<br />
stagonospora nodorum blotch<br />
failed to appear because <strong>of</strong> a lack <strong>of</strong><br />
primary inoculum when a<br />
- b <strong>Septoria</strong> tritici f. avenae Oats<br />
- <strong>Septoria</strong> tritici f. holci Holcus<br />
- <strong>Septoria</strong> tritici f. lolicola Lolium<br />
- <strong>Septoria</strong> passerinii Speckled leaf blotch<br />
<strong>of</strong> barley<br />
Barley<br />
- <strong>Septoria</strong> secalis Leaf spot <strong>of</strong> rye Rye<br />
<strong>Stagonospora</strong> spp. Phaeosphaeria <strong>Stagonospora</strong> nodorum <strong>Stagonospora</strong> nodorum Wheat<br />
nodorum blotch <strong>of</strong> wheat<br />
Phaeosphaeria <strong>Stagonospora</strong> avenae Oats<br />
avenaria f. sp. avenae<br />
Phaeosphaeria <strong>Stagonospora</strong> avenae Oats, wheat<br />
a (7)<br />
avenaria<br />
f. sp. triticea<br />
f. sp. triticea <strong>and</strong> triticale<br />
b Teleomorphic stages not found.<br />
susceptible crop <strong>and</strong> favorable<br />
environmental conditions<br />
prevailed.<br />
As late as the 1960s, diagnosis<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>Septoria</strong> diseases on wheat was<br />
not well developed even among<br />
plant pathologists <strong>and</strong> plant<br />
breeders. Leaf chlorosis <strong>and</strong><br />
necrosis was <strong>of</strong>ten viewed as part<br />
<strong>of</strong> the natural process <strong>of</strong><br />
maturation. Any <strong>of</strong> several leaf<br />
spotting pathogens could have<br />
been present <strong>and</strong> contributing to<br />
leaf death. When <strong>Septoria</strong> was<br />
recognized, it was <strong>of</strong>ten called<br />
“head septoria” which we know<br />
now as stagonospora nodorum<br />
blotch <strong>and</strong> “leaf septoria” which<br />
we know as septoria tritici blotch.<br />
Both <strong>of</strong>ten occur together <strong>and</strong> with<br />
other pathogens, <strong>and</strong> both can<br />
infect <strong>and</strong> cause symptoms on all<br />
parts <strong>of</strong> the wheat plant.<br />
Field diagnosis on the basis <strong>of</strong><br />
symptomology is regularly done,<br />
but <strong>of</strong>ten laboratory backup, with<br />
microscopic examination <strong>of</strong> spores,<br />
is necessary for accurate diagnosis.<br />
As can be seen in Table 2 (Eyal,<br />
1997), spore size <strong>and</strong> appearance<br />
may overlap, so some doubts may<br />
remain even after microscopic<br />
examination. Rapid tests have been<br />
developed that use immunological<br />
techniques mainly for early<br />
diagnosis in intensive production<br />
areas where chemical control is<br />
commonly used. Molecular genetic<br />
methods have been used recently<br />
to show similarities <strong>and</strong> differences<br />
between species <strong>and</strong> forma speciales<br />
(Arseniuk et al., 1997; Ueng et al.,<br />
1998.). The karyotype <strong>of</strong> S. nodorum<br />
suggests 14-19 chromosomes<br />
having approximately 0.5-3.5<br />
megabase pairs (Cooley <strong>and</strong> Caten,<br />
1991). McDonald <strong>and</strong> Martinez<br />
(1991) determined 14-16 b<strong>and</strong>s<br />
believed to correspond to<br />
chromosomes <strong>of</strong> 0.33-3.5 megabase<br />
pairs in S. tritici.<br />
Regardless <strong>of</strong> the fact that<br />
morphologic <strong>and</strong> genetic<br />
differences <strong>of</strong> considerable<br />
magnitude exist between S.<br />
nodorum <strong>and</strong> S. tritici, histological<br />
studies have shown that the