10.02.2022 Views

Robert Cohen - Theatre, Brief Version-McGraw-Hill Education (2016)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Theatre 17

their performance is affected by the way the audience

yields or withholds its responses through its laughter,

sighs, applause, gasps, and silences. Live theatrical performance

is always—even in naturalistic theatre—a two-way

communication between stage and house.

Live theatre also creates a relationship among the

audience members. Having arrived at the theatre as individuals

or in groups of two or three, they quickly find

themselves fused to a common experience with total

strangers: laughing at the same jokes, empathizing with

the same characters, experiencing the same revelations.

This broad communal response is never developed by

television drama, which is played chiefly to solitary or

clustered viewers who may engage online with other

viewers, but rarely in person; nor is it likely to happen

in movie houses, where audience members essentially

assume a one-on-one relationship with the screen and

rarely break out in a powerful collective reaction. In contrast,

live theatrical presentations generate social activity:

audience members arrive at the theatre at about the

same time, they mingle and chat during intermissions,

and they all depart together, often in spirited conversation

about the play. Moreover, they communicate during the

play: laughter and applause build upon themselves and

gain strength from the recognition that others are laughing

and applauding. The final ovation—unique to live

performance—inevitably involves the audience applauding

itself, as well as the performers, for understanding and

appreciating the experience they have all shared.

Plays can even generate collective political responses.

In a celebrated example, the Depression-era Waiting

for Lefty was staged as if the audience were a group of

union members; by the play’s end the audience was yelling

“Strike! Strike!” in response to the play’s issues.

Obviously, only a live performance could evoke such a

response. More recently, the 1998 revival of Cabaret,

restaged in 2015, converted the entire theatre space into a

1930s-era German nightclub. At the end of the show, the

once-frivolous activities on the stage have given way to

the early, horrific days of the Nazi regime. The audience

members were more than simply spectators—they were

part of the show, complicit in witnessing the horrors and

called upon to think and react.

Finally, live performance has the quality of immediacy.

The action of the play is taking place right now, as

it is being watched, and anything can happen. Although

in most professional productions the changes that occur

in performance from one night to the next are so subtle

only an expert would notice, the fact is that each night’s

presentation is unique and everyone present—in the

audience, in the cast, and behind the scenes—knows it.

This awareness lends an excitement that cannot be experienced

while watching films or video, which are wholly

“in the can” before they are viewed. One reason for the

excitement of live theatre, of course, is that mistakes can

happen in its performance; this possibility creates a certain

tension, perhaps even an edge of stage fright, which

some people say creates the ultimate thrill of the theatre.

But just as disaster can come without warning, so too

can splendor. On any given night, each actor is trying to

better her or his previous performance, and no one knows

when this collective effort will coalesce into something

sublime. In this way, the immediacy of live performance

creates a “presentness,” or “presence,” that embodies the

fundamental uncertainty of life itself. One prime function

of theatre is to address the uncertainties of human existence,

and the very format of live performance presents

moment-to-moment uncertainty right before our eyes.

Ultimately, this “immediate theatre” helps us define the

questions and confusions of our lives and lets us grapple,

in the present, with their implications.

Scripted and Rehearsed Performance While

theatre is always new and immediate, it is also scripted

and carefully prepared. The art of theatre lives in the tension

between these two opposing principles: it is always

spontaneous but also carefully and repeatedly rehearsed.

Theatre performances are largely prepared according to

written and well-rehearsed texts, or play scripts. In this

way they are often distinguished from other forms of

performance, such as improvisation and performance

installations. Although improvisation and ad-libbing

may play a role in the preparation process, and even in

certain actual performances, most play productions are

based on a script that was established before—and modified

during—the play’s rehearsal period, and most of the

action is permanently set during these rehearsals as well.

Mainstream professional play productions, therefore,

appear nearly the same night after night: for the most

part, the Broadway production of Wicked that you see on

Thursday will be almost identical to the show your friend

saw on Wednesday or your mother saw last fall. And if

you were to read the published text, you would see on

the page the same words you heard spoken or sung on

the stage.

But the text of a play is not, by any means, the play

itself. The play fully exists only in its performance—in

its “playing.” The script is merely the record the play

leaves behind after the audience has gone home. The

script, therefore, is to the play it represents only what

a shadow painting is to the face it silhouettes: it outlines

the principal features but conveys only the outer

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!