24.12.2012 Views

World Journal of Pharmaceutical research - WJPR!

World Journal of Pharmaceutical research - WJPR!

World Journal of Pharmaceutical research - WJPR!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Patel Sunilkumar <strong>World</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pharmaceutical</strong> <strong>research</strong><br />

Article Received on<br />

07 September 2012,<br />

DESIGN AND IN VITRO EVALUATION OF NOVEL IBUPROFEN<br />

www.wjpr.net<br />

SUSTAINED RELEASE MATRIX TABLETS BASED ON<br />

COMBINATION OF HYDROPHILIC AND HYDROPHOBIC MATRIX<br />

SYSTEM<br />

*Patel Sunilkumar A., Patel Jitendra L.<br />

Shree Krishna Institute <strong>of</strong> Pharmacy College, Shankhalpur, Becharaji 384210 Mehsana,<br />

Revised on 25September2012,<br />

Accepted on 25 October 2012<br />

*Correspondence for<br />

Author:<br />

* Patel Sunilkumar A<br />

Shree Krishna Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Pharmacy College, sankhalpur,<br />

becharaji-384210,<br />

Mehsana,India<br />

sunil.pharma1988@rediffmail.<br />

com<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pharmaceutical</strong> <strong>research</strong><br />

Volume 1, Issue 5, 1330-1341. Research Article ISSN 2277 – 7105<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Gujarat, India.<br />

Hydroxypropyl and Ethyl cellulose are matrix polymer can be used in<br />

formulation <strong>of</strong> sustained release dosage form <strong>of</strong> slightly water soluble<br />

drug. It was decided to study the effect <strong>of</strong> these hydrophilic and<br />

hydrophobic polymers at different matrix polymer ratio, on release<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> drug from matrix formulation prepared using hydrophilic<br />

and hydrophobic matrix system and both matrix systems in different<br />

ratio used. Ibupr<strong>of</strong>en was considered as ideal drug for sustained<br />

release formulation. The sustained release matrix <strong>of</strong> Ibupr<strong>of</strong>en were<br />

prepared by wet granulation technique in differ matrix polymers ratio.<br />

Drug release study was carried out using BP apparatus 2 with pH 7 for<br />

12 hr at 1 hr interval. During dissolution study different parameters<br />

such as effect <strong>of</strong> different matrix polymers ratio like HPMC: EC was<br />

carried out. The results <strong>of</strong> dissolution study showed that the release <strong>of</strong><br />

drug from Matrix prepared from different ratio <strong>of</strong> both HPMC and EC gets more retarded than<br />

from HPMC and EC alone.<br />

KEY WORDS: Ibupr<strong>of</strong>en, HPMC K 4 M, EC, PEG 600, Lactose.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Ibupr<strong>of</strong>en is chiral propionic acid derivative belonging to the class <strong>of</strong> non-steroidal anti-<br />

inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Due to its analgesic, antipyretic and anti inflammatory<br />

actions it is used in the treatment <strong>of</strong> inflammatory condition such as rheumatoid arthritis,<br />

1330


Patel Sunilkumar <strong>World</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pharmaceutical</strong> <strong>research</strong><br />

osteoarthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, mild and moderate pain, dysmenorrhoea, vascular<br />

heads and fever. The dose level as an anti-rheumatic for adults is about 1.2 to 3.2 g orally per<br />

day in 3 or 4 divided doses. The common dosage ranges are tablets with 200 mg, 400 mg, 600<br />

mg and 800 mg and slow release tablets with 800 mg. The OTC dosage forms are mainly the<br />

200 mg and 400 mg forms (except for the United States and other countries, here the 200 mg<br />

forms is the only OTC form). Ibupr<strong>of</strong>en is readily absorbed by the gastrointestinal tract. The<br />

peak plasma levels are reached within 1 – 2 h. After an oral dose <strong>of</strong> 200 – 400 mg, 15 – 25<br />

mg/ml appear in the blood serum. Ibupr<strong>of</strong>en has an extensive protein binding capacity (99%).<br />

Ibupr<strong>of</strong>en is excreted via the kidneys. The biological half-life is 2 hours. After 24 h 100% <strong>of</strong><br />

the active substance is excreted in the urine. [1,2]<br />

Ibupr<strong>of</strong>en is slight soluble in water, and hence judicious selection <strong>of</strong> release-retarding<br />

excipients is necessary to achieve a constant in vivo input rate <strong>of</strong> the drug. Most commonly<br />

used method <strong>of</strong> modulating the drug release is to include it in a matrix system. Because <strong>of</strong><br />

their flexibility, hydrophilic polymer matrix systems are widely used in oral controlled drug<br />

delivery to obtain a desirable drug release pr<strong>of</strong>ile, cost effectiveness, and broad regulatory<br />

acceptance. hence, in the present work and attempt has been made to develop once-daily<br />

sustained release matrix tablets <strong>of</strong> Ibupr<strong>of</strong>en using hydrophilic matrix materials and<br />

hydrophobic material such as hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC), Ethyl Cellulose(EC)<br />

and PEG 600. [3,4]<br />

Drug release for extended duration, particularly for highly water-soluble drugs, using a<br />

hydrophilic and Hydrophobic matrix system is restricted because <strong>of</strong> rapid diffusion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

dissolved drug through the hydrophilic and hydrophobic gel network. For such drugs with<br />

high water solubility, hydrophobic polymers are suitable, along with a hydrophilic matrix for<br />

developing sustained-release dosage forms. Hydrophobic polymers provide several<br />

advantages, ranging from good stability at varying pH values and moisture levels to well<br />

established safe applications. Therefore, in this study, the hydrophobic polymers like ethyl<br />

cellulose (EC) were used. Main objective <strong>of</strong> study was to formulate and evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

sustained release dosage form by different polymer material to investigate the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

Polymer. [8]<br />

www.wjpr.net<br />

1331


Patel Sunilkumar <strong>World</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pharmaceutical</strong> <strong>research</strong><br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

MATERIAL<br />

Ibupr<strong>of</strong>en was procured from Ratmani <strong>Pharmaceutical</strong> pvt Ltd Mehsana. Hydroxypropyl<br />

methylcellulose K4M (HPMC K4M) was obtained from Purui Enterprise pvt ltd Ahmedabad.<br />

Ethyl Cellulose was obtained from Chemeco company pvt ltd Ahmedabad.PEG was obtained<br />

from Shital Chemical, Ahmedabad. Lactose, Magnesium stearate, and talc were purchased<br />

from Shital Chemical pvt ltd, Ahmedabad. All other materials and chemicals used were <strong>of</strong><br />

either pharmaceutical or analytical grade.<br />

METHODS<br />

Tablet Preparation<br />

Ibupr<strong>of</strong>en Sustained Release matrix tablets were prepared by Wet granulation technique. 7,8<br />

Drug was passed through 40# sieve. HPMC K 4M, Ethyl cellulose, Lactose, PEG 400 were<br />

passed through 30# sieve. All other ingredients were passed through 40# sieve. All<br />

ingredients were mixed for 15-20 min. After mixing, Mg. stearate (60# sieve) and Talc were<br />

added to mixer blend and mix again for 3-5 min. Prepared blend was compressed (10/30<br />

diameter, flat punches) using Multi Rotary Tablet Machine (Type: Patel services pvt ltd,<br />

Ahemdabad). Each tablet contains 200 mg <strong>of</strong> Ibupr<strong>of</strong>en and other pharmaceuticals<br />

ingredients as listed in Table 1.<br />

EVALUATION OF POWDER AND POWER BLEND<br />

Angle <strong>of</strong> Repose<br />

Angle <strong>of</strong> Repose <strong>of</strong> Power and Power blend were determined by the funnel method.<br />

Accurately weight powder blend were taken in the funnel. Height <strong>of</strong> the funnel was adjusted<br />

in such a way the tip <strong>of</strong> the funnel just touched the apex <strong>of</strong> the powder blend. Powder blend<br />

was allowed to flow through the funnel freely on to the surface. Diameter <strong>of</strong> the powder cone<br />

was measured and angle <strong>of</strong> repose was calculated using the following equation. [3],[4]<br />

Tan α = h/r<br />

DENSITY<br />

Bulk Density (BD)<br />

Weigh accurately 10 g <strong>of</strong> Power and Power blend, which were previously passed through 20#<br />

sieve and transferred in 100 ml graduated cylinder. Carefully level the powder without<br />

www.wjpr.net<br />

1332


Patel Sunilkumar <strong>World</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pharmaceutical</strong> <strong>research</strong><br />

compacting, and read the unsettled apparent volume (V0). Calculate the apparent bulk density<br />

in gm/ml by the following formula. [3],[4]<br />

Bulk density = Weigh <strong>of</strong> powder/ Bulk volume<br />

Tapped Density (TD)<br />

Weigh accurately 10g <strong>of</strong> Power and Power blend which were previously passed through 20#<br />

sieve and transferred in 100 ml graduated cylinder. Then mechanically tap the cylinder<br />

containing the sample by raising the cylinder and allowing it to drop under its own weight<br />

using mechanically tapped density tester that provides a fixed drop <strong>of</strong> 14±2 mm at a nominal<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> 300 drops per minute. Tap the cylinder for 500 times initially and measure the tapped<br />

volume (V1) to the nearest graduated units, repeat the tapping an additional 750 times and<br />

measure the tap volume (V2) to the nearest graduated units. If the difference between the two<br />

volumes is less than 2% then final the volume (V2). Calculate the tapped bulk density in<br />

gm/ml by the following formula. [3],[4]<br />

Tapped density = Weigh <strong>of</strong> powder / Tapped volume<br />

Carr’s Index<br />

Compressibility index <strong>of</strong> Power and Power blend were determined by Carr’s compressibility<br />

index. It was a simple test to evaluate the BD and TD <strong>of</strong> a powder and the rate at which it<br />

packed down [3],[4] . The formula for Carr’s index is as below:<br />

Hausner’s Ratio<br />

www.wjpr.net<br />

Carr’s index (%) = [(TD-BD)*100] / TD<br />

Hausner’s Ratio is a number that is correlated to the flowability <strong>of</strong> Power and Power blend.<br />

[3],[4]<br />

Husner’s Ratio = TD / BD<br />

EVALUATION OF TABLETS<br />

Thickness<br />

Thickness <strong>of</strong> the tablets was determined using a vernier caliper (Sunil Corporation pvt Ltd,<br />

Nadiad). [3]<br />

1333


Patel Sunilkumar <strong>World</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pharmaceutical</strong> <strong>research</strong><br />

Weight Variation Test<br />

To study weight variation, 20 tablets <strong>of</strong> each formulation were weighed using an electronic<br />

balance (Digital Weighing Balance, Purvi Enterprise pvt Ltd Ahmedabad), and the test was<br />

performed according to the <strong>of</strong>ficial method. [4]<br />

Hardness<br />

Hardness <strong>of</strong> the tablets was determined using a hardness testing apparatus (Monseto Type,<br />

Sunil Corporation pvt Ltd, Nadiad). A tablet hardness <strong>of</strong> about 5-6 kg/cm2 is considered<br />

adequate for mechanical stability. [4]<br />

Friability<br />

The friability <strong>of</strong> the tablets was measured in a Roche friabilator (Sunil Corporation pvt Ltd,<br />

Nadiad ).Tablets <strong>of</strong> a known weight ( W0 ) or a sample <strong>of</strong> tablets are deducted in a drum for a<br />

fixed time (100 revolutions) and weighed (W) again. Percentage friability was calculated<br />

from the loss in weight as given in equation as below. The weight loss should not be more<br />

than 1% w/w. [4]<br />

www.wjpr.net<br />

% Friability = (W0-W)/ W0 × 100<br />

Percentages Friability <strong>of</strong> tablets less than 1% are considered acceptable.<br />

IN VITRO RELEASE STUDIES<br />

Dissolution pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> the prepared tablets were determined u s in BP II rotating paddle<br />

apparatus at 37 C ± 0.5 and a rotating speed <strong>of</strong> 50 rpm in a 900 ml distilled water. 5 ml <strong>of</strong><br />

sample was withdrawn after 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,8 ,9,10,11 and 12 hours and was<br />

replaced by an equal volume <strong>of</strong> fresh dissolution medium <strong>of</strong> same pH and Collected samples<br />

were analyzed systronics UV/VIS double beam spectrophotometer 2203 at 265 nm. and<br />

cumulative percent drug release was calculated. The Study was performed in triplicate. [10,11,12]<br />

1334


Patel Sunilkumar <strong>World</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pharmaceutical</strong> <strong>research</strong><br />

RESULT AND DISCUSSION<br />

Standard Calibration Curve <strong>of</strong> Ibupr<strong>of</strong>en<br />

Table 1: Absorbance data for the calibration curve <strong>of</strong> ibupr<strong>of</strong>en in ethanol at 265nm<br />

www.wjpr.net<br />

Absorbance<br />

Sr no. Concentration<br />

(µg/ml)<br />

1 100 0.109<br />

2 200 0.201<br />

3 300 0.282<br />

4 400 0.384<br />

5 500 0.510<br />

6 600 0.637<br />

7 700 0.750<br />

8 800 0.882<br />

1<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

PURE IBUPROFEN<br />

Absorbance<br />

In ethanol<br />

y = 0.001x - 0.031<br />

R² = 0.994<br />

0 500 1000<br />

Time<br />

Figure 1. Standard calibration curve <strong>of</strong> Ibupr<strong>of</strong>en in 0.1ethanol at 265 nm<br />

1335


Patel Sunilkumar <strong>World</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pharmaceutical</strong> <strong>research</strong><br />

Composition <strong>of</strong> Ibupr<strong>of</strong>en Sustained Release Tablets<br />

Table 2: Different Formulation for Ibupr<strong>of</strong>en Sustained Release Tablet<br />

www.wjpr.net<br />

Ingredients F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7<br />

Ibupr<strong>of</strong>en 200 200 200 200 200 200 200<br />

EC --- 100 -- -- -- -- --<br />

HPMC 100 -- -- -- -- -- --<br />

EC:HPMC -- -- 60:40 40:60 50:50 75:25 25:75<br />

PEG 4000 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2<br />

Lactose 50.86 50.86 50.86 50.86 50.86 50.86 50.86<br />

Magnesium<br />

Stearate<br />

1.94 1.94 1.94 1.94 1.94 1.94 1.94<br />

*HPMC K4M and EC indicate Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose and Ethyl cellulose all batches<br />

contained 200mg <strong>of</strong> Ibupr<strong>of</strong>en.<br />

Pre-Compression Evaluations <strong>of</strong> Ibupr<strong>of</strong>en Sustained Matrix Tablets<br />

Table 3: Physical Properties <strong>of</strong> Ingredients<br />

Ingredient<br />

(10gm)<br />

Bulk<br />

Density<br />

(gm/cm 3 )<br />

Tapped<br />

Density<br />

(gm/cm 3 )<br />

Hausner’s<br />

ratio<br />

Card’s index<br />

Angle <strong>of</strong><br />

Repose<br />

Ibupr<strong>of</strong>en 0.555 0.588 1.06 5.61 26.29 0<br />

HPMC 0.540 0.606 1.12 10.89 20.18 0<br />

EC 0.298 0.322 1.08 7.45 22.25 0<br />

Table 4: Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Different Power Blends<br />

Batch<br />

Code<br />

Bulk<br />

density<br />

(gm/cm 3 )<br />

Tapped<br />

density<br />

(gm/cm 3 )<br />

Hausner’s<br />

ratio<br />

(HR)<br />

Carr’s index<br />

(Ic)<br />

Angle <strong>of</strong><br />

repose<br />

(ø)<br />

F1 0.404 0.505 1.25 20.00 20.37 0<br />

F2 0.394 0.476 1.20 17.22 22.56 0<br />

F3 0.394 0.446 1.13 11.66 12.62 0<br />

F4 0.381 0.469 1.23 18.76 17.90 0<br />

F5 0.385 0.468 1.21 17.73 16.85 0<br />

F6 0.340 0.432 1.27 21.29 17.96 0<br />

F7 0.402 0.512 1.27 21.48 17.03 0<br />

1336


Time<br />

(hr)<br />

Patel Sunilkumar <strong>World</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pharmaceutical</strong> <strong>research</strong><br />

Post-Compression Evaluations <strong>of</strong> Ibupr<strong>of</strong>en Sustained Matrix Tablets<br />

Table 5: Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Tablets<br />

Batch<br />

Code<br />

In-Vitro Drug Release Studies<br />

Table 6: In-Vitro Drug Release Studies <strong>of</strong> Ibupr<strong>of</strong>en sustained release tablets<br />

www.wjpr.net<br />

Weight<br />

Variation<br />

Average<br />

Wt in<br />

(mg)±SD<br />

Hardness<br />

(kg/cm 2 )<br />

±SD<br />

Diamete<br />

r<br />

(mm)<br />

±SD<br />

% Cumulative Release<br />

Thicknes<br />

s<br />

(mm)<br />

±SD<br />

Friability<br />

%±SD<br />

Drug Release<br />

%±SD<br />

F1 259±5.0 4.4±0.5 8.5±0.03 5.5±0.01 0.56±0.01 81.99±0.56<br />

F2 265±5.5 4.1±0.4 8.5±0.02 5.5±0.04 0.58±0.04 78.04±0.16<br />

F3 255±5.1 3.4±0.6 8.5±0.04 5.3±0.02 0.63±0.02 71.34±0.96<br />

F4 260±5.5 3.85±0.5 8.7±0.01 5.3±0.01 0.60±0.01 62.11±0.10<br />

F5 270±5.1 3.5±0.3 8.5±0.02 5.3±0.03 0.62±0.03 68.47±0.51<br />

F6 260±5.3 3.1±0.6 8.7±0.03 5.3±0.02 0.67±0.01 74.82±0.64<br />

F7 255±5.1 3.80±0.4 8.5±0.01 5.3±0.01 0.59±0.02 65.23±0.15<br />

F1±SD F2±SD F3±SD F4±SD F5±SD F6±SD F7±SD<br />

0.5 18.05±0.56 17.09±0.10 15.01±0.57 12.06±0.49 14.03±1.21 16.07±1.01 13.01±0.53<br />

1 24.23±1.11 23.51±0.38 21.14±0.51 18.32±0.85 20.44±0.54 22.02±0.64 19.19±0.52<br />

2 31.24±1.07 29.05±0.50 26.71±0.70 23.12±0.70 25.62±0.47 27.37±0.44 24.11±0.81<br />

3 37.44±0.83 35.19±0.01 31.57±0.60 27.79±0.66 30.21±0.99 33.03±0.19 28.89±0.24<br />

4 43.01±0.54 41.17±0.17 37.56±0.52 31.32±0.44 35.23±1.56 39.69±0.63 33.46±1.03<br />

5 49.59±0.12 46.21±0.98 42.09±0.78 35.37±0.32 40.34±0.90 44.12±0.39 37.34±1.15<br />

6 54.43±0.04 51.34±1.13 47.39±0.17 39.55±1.26 44.83±0.46 49.58±0.94 41.21±0.21<br />

7 59.32±0.49 56.48±1.04 51.52±0.66 42.71±0.24 48.42±0.30 54.66±0.50 45.33±0.46<br />

8 64.49±1.09 61.55±0.41 55.66±0.54 46.93±0.06 52.69±0.23 58.81±0.87 49.51±0.31<br />

9 68.62±1.07 65.69±0.60 59.75±0.45 50.56±0.68 56.88±0.47 62.93±0.51 53.73±0.66<br />

10 72.86±1.06 69.77±0.02 63.92±0.35 54.71±0.48 60.99±0.62 66.44±0.72 57.91±0.49<br />

11 77.18±0.76 73.82±0.76 67.09±0.09 58.86±0.88 64.26±0.59 70.65±0.28 61.62±0.27<br />

12 1.99±0.40 78.04±0.25 71.34±0.62 62.11±1.17 68.47±1.12 74.82±0.54 65.23±0.34<br />

1337


Patel Sunilkumar <strong>World</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pharmaceutical</strong> <strong>research</strong><br />

Figure 2. In-vitro dissolution pr<strong>of</strong>iles for tablets <strong>of</strong> batches f1 to f7 (Using dissolution<br />

apparatus)<br />

Ibupr<strong>of</strong>en is chiral propionic acid derivative belonging to the class <strong>of</strong> non-steroidal anti-<br />

inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Due to its analgesic, antipyretic and anti inflammatory<br />

actions it is used in the treatment <strong>of</strong> inflammatory condition such as rheumatoid arthritis ,<br />

osteoarthritis , ankylosing spondyolitis, mild and moderate pain, dysmenorrheal, vascular<br />

heads and fever. The dose level as an anti-rheumatic for adults is about 1.2 to 3.2 g orally per<br />

day in 3 or 4 divided doses. The common dosage ranges are tablets with 200 mg, 400 mg, 600<br />

mg and 800 mg and slow release tablets with 800 mg. The OTC dosage forms are mainly the<br />

200 mg and 400 mg form s (except for the United States and other countries, here the200 mg<br />

form is the only OTC form). Ibupr<strong>of</strong>en is readily absorbed by the gastrointestinal tract. The<br />

peak plasma levels are reached within 1 – 2 h. After an oral dose <strong>of</strong> 200 – 400 mg, 15 – 25<br />

mg/ml appear in the blood serum. Ibupr<strong>of</strong>en has an extensive protein binding capacity (99%).<br />

Ibupr<strong>of</strong>en is excreted via the kidneys. The biological half-life is about 2 hours. After 24 h<br />

100% <strong>of</strong> the active substance is excreted in the urine.<br />

Ibupr<strong>of</strong>en with all material that developments <strong>of</strong> sustained release dosage form. In study<br />

HPMCk4M and Ethyl cellulose which were used in different Ratio and check optimize<br />

weighting for suitable sustained release dosage and using hydrophilic matrix polymer and<br />

hydrophobic matrix polymer resepectly. Batches <strong>of</strong> ibupr<strong>of</strong>en were formulated with using<br />

HPMC K4M, Ethyl cellulose, PEG600, Lactose, magnesium stearate and talc shown table1.<br />

www.wjpr.net<br />

%Cumulative Release<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

0 5 10 15<br />

Time in hr<br />

BATCH1<br />

BATCH2<br />

BATCH3<br />

BATCH4<br />

BATCH5<br />

BATCH6<br />

BATCH7<br />

1338


Patel Sunilkumar <strong>World</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pharmaceutical</strong> <strong>research</strong><br />

Formulated Power blend <strong>of</strong> Different batches were Evaluated. Showed results <strong>of</strong> Power blend<br />

have Bulk density and tapped density <strong>of</strong> F1 to F7 batches that 0.340 to 0.404 and 0.432 to<br />

0.532 Respect. Carr’s Index and hausner’s ratio have good compare to std value as according<br />

to IP <strong>of</strong> F1 to F7 batches that 11.66 to 21.48 and 1.13 to 1.27 shown table 3 Respect. Angle <strong>of</strong><br />

repose has good and Excellent as Compare standard value as According to IP <strong>of</strong> F1 to F7<br />

Batches that 12.62 0 to 22.56 0 shown table3. Ibupr<strong>of</strong>en Tablets were Prepared successfully by<br />

wet granulation Technique. In Weight variation test, the Pharmacopoeia limit for percent <strong>of</strong><br />

deviation for tablets <strong>of</strong> more than 260mg is ±5%. The average percent deviation <strong>of</strong> all tablets<br />

was found to be limit and hence all formulations passed the weight variation test. The hardness<br />

<strong>of</strong> tablets <strong>of</strong> all formulation was in range <strong>of</strong> 2.5±0.51 to 3.8±0.54 kg\cm 2 . The Thickness <strong>of</strong><br />

tablets ranged from 5.204±0.01 to 5.514±0.01.i.e. less than 1%. The Diameter <strong>of</strong> tablets<br />

ranged from 8.301±0.01 to 8.520±0.01. The Friability <strong>of</strong> tablets <strong>of</strong> all formulation was in<br />

range <strong>of</strong> 0.059±0.01 to 0.065±0.01shown table 4.All thickness shown uniform thickness. The<br />

Drug content was found to be uniform all formulation and ranged from 62.11% to 81.99%.<br />

Shown in figure1<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Among all formulation f4 containing 40% <strong>of</strong> ehtylcellulose and 60% <strong>of</strong> Hydroxy propyl<br />

methyl cellulose showed in vitro drug release 62.11% and which is equivalent to marketed<br />

preparation hence considered as most promising formulation. Result also showed that among<br />

hydrophilic and hydrophobic matrix polymer. HPMC sustain more than EC .Combination <strong>of</strong><br />

HPMC and EC retain drug more than that individual matrix polymer. In study concluded<br />

HPMC and EC are hydrophilic and hydrophobic matrix polymer which using matrix foaming<br />

agent by wet granular technique to sustain the release <strong>of</strong> ibupr<strong>of</strong>en.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

We are grateful to Ratmani <strong>Pharmaceutical</strong> Ltd, Mehsana for providing gift sample <strong>of</strong><br />

Ibupr<strong>of</strong>en.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Dabbagh M.A and Beitmashal L.Sustained Release Formulation and In-Vitro Evaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Ibupr<strong>of</strong>en-Hpmc Matrix Tablets. Jundishapur J Natural Pharm Products, 2006; 1:1-7.<br />

2. Prajapati Bhupendra G., Patel Krunal R.Design and In Vitro Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Novel<br />

Nicorandil Sustained Release Matrix Tablets Based On Combination <strong>of</strong> Hydrophilic and<br />

Hydrophobic Matrix System. Int J Pharm Sci. and Res, 2010; 1(1): 2143-2156.<br />

www.wjpr.net<br />

1339


Patel Sunilkumar <strong>World</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pharmaceutical</strong> <strong>research</strong><br />

3. Subramaniam Kannan, Rangasamy Manivannan, Kugalur Ganesan Parthiban<br />

Kakkatummal Nishad and Natesan Senthil Kumar. Formulation and Evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

Sustained Release Tablets <strong>of</strong> Acecl<strong>of</strong>enac using Hydrophilic Matrix System. Int J Pharma<br />

Tech Res, 2010; 2(3):1775-1780.<br />

4. Raghavendra raon.G, Gandhi sagar, patel tarun.Formulation And Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Sustained<br />

Release Matrix tablets <strong>of</strong> Tramadol Hydrochloride.Int J Pharm and pharmaceutical sci<br />

,2009; 1(1):660-671.<br />

5. Sahu Atul Kumar, Singh Shailendra Kumar and Verma Amita. Formulation<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> Buoyant Controlled Release Tablets Containing Chitosan: Optimization<br />

<strong>of</strong> In vitro Dissolution and Release Kinetics.Int J Pharma and <strong>Pharmaceutical</strong> Sci, 2011;<br />

3(2):81-85.<br />

6. Selvadurai Muralidharan, Subramania Nainar Meyyanathan, Kaliaperumal Krishnaraj 1<br />

And Sekar Rajan .Development <strong>of</strong> oral Sustained release dosage form for low melting<br />

chiral compound Dexibupr<strong>of</strong>en and it’s in vitro-in vivo evaluation. Int J Drug Dev, 2011;<br />

3:492-502.<br />

7. Shoaib M. Harris, tazeen japery, Merchant humid a. and yousuf Rabia Ismail. Evaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Drug Release Kinetics from Ibupr<strong>of</strong>en Matrix Tablets Using Hpmc. Pakistan J Pharm<br />

Sci, 2006; 19(2):119-124.<br />

8. Tiwari Sandip B., Murthy T. Krishna, Pai M. Raveendra, Mehta Pavak R., and Chowdary<br />

Pasula B.Controlled Release Formulation <strong>of</strong> Tramadol Hydrochloride Using Hydrophilic<br />

and Hydrophobic Matrix System. American Association <strong>of</strong> pharm scientists Pharm Sci<br />

Tech, 2003; 4(3):E31.<br />

9. Bhagwat Durgacharan A, Kawtikwar Pravin S and Sakarkar Dinesh M. Sustained Release<br />

Matrices <strong>of</strong> Verapamil HCl Using Glyceryl Monosterate and Stearic Acid.Res J Pharm<br />

Tech, 2008; 1(4):405-409.<br />

10. Yeole P.G., gatte UC, babla I B and nakhat PD. Design and Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Xanthan Gum-<br />

based Sustained Release Matrix Tablets <strong>of</strong> Dichl<strong>of</strong>enac sodium. Ind J Pharm Sci, 2006;<br />

185-189.<br />

11. Senthil Kumar B, Prem Anand D C, Senthil Kumar K L, Saravanakumar M and<br />

Thirumurthy R.Formulation and evaluation <strong>of</strong> diltiazem hydrochloride Extented release<br />

tablet by melt granulation technique. Int J Pharm & Indu Res, 2011; 1(1): 36-42.<br />

12. Saleh A. Al-Suwayeh, Mohammed H. El-Shaboury, Saeed M. Al-Baraki, Abubakar S.<br />

Elgorashy and Ehab I. Taha. In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Sustained Release<br />

www.wjpr.net<br />

1340


Patel Sunilkumar <strong>World</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Pharmaceutical</strong> <strong>research</strong><br />

Hydralazine Hydrochloride Tablets Prepared by Thermal Granulation Technique. Aus J<br />

<strong>of</strong> Basic and Applied Sci, 2009; 3(3): 2866-2875.<br />

www.wjpr.net<br />

1341

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!