Emotional inteligence

aygun.shukurova
from aygun.shukurova More from this publisher
04.02.2022 Views

82/661discern and respond appropriately to the moods, temperaments,motivations, and desires of other people." Inintra-personal intelligence, the key to self-knowledge, heincluded "access to one's own feelings and the ability todiscriminate among them and draw upon them to guidebehavior." 11SPOCK VS. DATA WHEN COGNITIONIS NOT ENOUGHThere is one dimension of personal intelligence that isbroadly pointed to, but little explored, in Gardner's elaborations:the role of emotions. Perhaps this is so because,as Gardner suggested to me, his work is sostrongly informed by a cognitive-science model of mind.Thus his view of these intelligences emphasizes cognition—theunderstanding of oneself and of others inmotives, in habits of working, and in putting that insightinto use in conducting one's own life and getting alongwith others. But like the kinesthetic realm, where physicalbrilliance manifests itself nonverbally, the realm ofthe emotions extends, too, beyond the reach of languageand cognition.While there is ample room in Gardner's descriptionsof the personal intelligences for insight into the play ofemotions and mastery in managing them, Gardner andthose who work with him have not pursued in great

83/661detail the role of feeling in these intelligences, focusingmore on cognitions about feeling. This focus, perhapsunintentionally, leaves unexplored the rich sea of emotionsthat makes the inner life and relationships so complex,so compelling, and so often puzzling. And it leavesyet to be plumbed both the sense in which there is intelligencein the emotions and the sense in which intelligencecan be brought to emotions.Gardner's emphasis on the cognitive elements in thepersonal intelligences reflects the Zeitgeist of psychologythat has shaped his views. Psychology's overemphasison cognition even in the realm of emotion is, inpart, due to a quirk in the history of that science. Duringthe middle decades of this century academic psychologywas dominated by behaviorists in the mold of B. F. Skinner,who felt that only behavior that could be seen objectively,from the outside, could be studied with scientificaccuracy. The behaviorists ruled all inner life, includingemotions, out-of-bounds for science.Then, with the coming in the late 1960s of the "cognitiverevolution," the focus of psychological science turnedto how the mind registers and stores information, andthe nature of intelligence. But emotions were still offlimits.Conventional wisdom among cognitive scientistsheld that intelligence entails a cold, hard-nosed processingof fact. It is hyperrational, rather like Star Treks

82/661

discern and respond appropriately to the moods, temperaments,

motivations, and desires of other people." In

intra-personal intelligence, the key to self-knowledge, he

included "access to one's own feelings and the ability to

discriminate among them and draw upon them to guide

behavior." 11

SPOCK VS. DATA WHEN COGNITION

IS NOT ENOUGH

There is one dimension of personal intelligence that is

broadly pointed to, but little explored, in Gardner's elaborations:

the role of emotions. Perhaps this is so because,

as Gardner suggested to me, his work is so

strongly informed by a cognitive-science model of mind.

Thus his view of these intelligences emphasizes cognition—the

understanding of oneself and of others in

motives, in habits of working, and in putting that insight

into use in conducting one's own life and getting along

with others. But like the kinesthetic realm, where physical

brilliance manifests itself nonverbally, the realm of

the emotions extends, too, beyond the reach of language

and cognition.

While there is ample room in Gardner's descriptions

of the personal intelligences for insight into the play of

emotions and mastery in managing them, Gardner and

those who work with him have not pursued in great

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!