Emotional inteligence
80/661varieties of intelligence. Interpersonal intelligence, forexample, broke down into four distinct abilities: leadership,the ability to nurture relationships and keepfriends, the ability to resolve conflicts, and skill at thekind of social analysis that four-year-old Judy excels at.This multifaceted view of intelligence offers a richerpicture of a child's ability and potential for success thanthe standard IQ. When Spectrum students were evaluatedon the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale—once thegold standard of IQ tests—and again by a battery designedto measure Gardner's spectrum of intelligences,there was no significant relationship between children'sscores on the two tests. 9 The five children with thehighest IQs (from 125 to 133) showed a variety of profileson the ten strengths measured by the Spectrumtest. For example, of the five "smartest" children accordingto the IQ tests, one was strong in three areas, threehad strengths in two areas, and one "smart" child hadjust one Spectrum strength. Those strengths werescattered: four of these children's strengths were in music,two in the visual arts, one in social understanding,one in logic, two in language. None of the five high-IQkids were strong in movement, numbers, or mechanics;movement and numbers were actually weak spots fortwo of these five.
Gardner's conclusion was that "the Stanford-Binet IntelligenceScale did not predict successful performanceacross or on a consistent subset of Spectrum activities."On the other hand, the Spectrum scores give parentsand teachers clear guidance about the realms that thesechildren will take a spontaneous interest in, and wherethey will do well enough to develop the passions thatcould one day lead beyond proficiency to mastery.Gardner's thinking about the multiplicity of intelligencecontinues to evolve. Some ten years after he firstpublished his theory, Gardner gave these nutshell summariesof the personal intelligences:Inter personal intelligence is the ability to understandother people: what motivates them, howthey work, how to work cooperatively with them.Successful salespeople, politicians, teachers, clinicians,and religious leaders are all likely to be individualswith high degrees of interpersonal intelligence,Intrapersonal intelligence . . . is a correlativeability, turned inward. It is a capacity to forman accurate, veridical model of oneself and to beable to use that model to operate effectively inlife. 1081/661In another rendering, Gardner noted that the core ofinterpersonal intelligence includes the "capacities to
- Page 30 and 31: 30/661able to ponder and reflect. B
- Page 32 and 33: 32/661To better grasp the potent ho
- Page 34 and 35: 34/661them. Because this part of th
- Page 36 and 37: 36/661the family unit and the long-
- Page 38 and 39: 2Anatomy of an Emotional HijackingL
- Page 40 and 41: moment passes, those so possessed h
- Page 42 and 43: 42/661feeling, as well as any feeli
- Page 44 and 45: 44/661It is in moments such as thes
- Page 46 and 47: 46/661did he realize that the girl
- Page 48 and 49: 48/661LeDoux overturned the prevail
- Page 50 and 51: original signal goes straight from
- Page 52 and 53: messages from the brain to regulate
- Page 54 and 55: 54/661memories date from the first
- Page 56 and 57: 56/661falling—illustrates the pow
- Page 58 and 59: sensory information that have not b
- Page 60 and 61: 60/661to the amygdala, but to the n
- Page 62 and 63: 62/661zones to the emotional urgenc
- Page 64 and 65: 64/661capacity of attention that ho
- Page 66 and 67: 66/661the amygdala, whatever the ne
- Page 68 and 69: PART TWOTHE NATURE OFEMOTIONALINTEL
- Page 70 and 71: 70/661After transferring to a priva
- Page 72 and 73: course it accounts for. But what da
- Page 74 and 75: 74/661level of young people of comp
- Page 76 and 77: 76/661margins of games rather than
- Page 78 and 79: 78/661competencies and gifts, and c
- Page 82 and 83: 82/661discern and respond appropria
- Page 84 and 85: 84/661Mr. Spock, the archetype of d
- Page 86 and 87: you get that are essential for inte
- Page 88 and 89: 88/661for instance, so highly value
- Page 90 and 91: the subtle social signals that indi
- Page 92 and 93: 92/661adept in the realm of mind bu
- Page 94 and 95: 4Know ThyselfA belligerent samurai,
- Page 96 and 97: 96/661faculty of mind in writing of
- Page 98 and 99: 98/661• Self-aware. Aware of thei
- Page 100 and 101: 100/661Temple University, to assess
- Page 102 and 103: 102/661Gary was emotionally flat, c
- Page 104 and 105: 104/661silent. When her therapist t
- Page 106 and 107: 106/661Elliot's tumor, growing just
- Page 108 and 109: 108/661accepting virtually every po
- Page 110 and 111: 110/661It may be that a talent for
- Page 112 and 113: 112/661just out of his awareness an
- Page 114 and 115: 114/661proportionate to circumstanc
- Page 116 and 117: 116/661have treated them, leaving t
- Page 118 and 119: worked themselves into a rage in or
- Page 120 and 121: explain why some views about it are
- Page 122 and 123: are so much more prone to anger if
- Page 124 and 125: subsided, and a third on top of tho
- Page 126 and 127: can no longer think straight. When
- Page 128 and 129: it stops that angry train of though
80/661
varieties of intelligence. Interpersonal intelligence, for
example, broke down into four distinct abilities: leadership,
the ability to nurture relationships and keep
friends, the ability to resolve conflicts, and skill at the
kind of social analysis that four-year-old Judy excels at.
This multifaceted view of intelligence offers a richer
picture of a child's ability and potential for success than
the standard IQ. When Spectrum students were evaluated
on the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale—once the
gold standard of IQ tests—and again by a battery designed
to measure Gardner's spectrum of intelligences,
there was no significant relationship between children's
scores on the two tests. 9 The five children with the
highest IQs (from 125 to 133) showed a variety of profiles
on the ten strengths measured by the Spectrum
test. For example, of the five "smartest" children according
to the IQ tests, one was strong in three areas, three
had strengths in two areas, and one "smart" child had
just one Spectrum strength. Those strengths were
scattered: four of these children's strengths were in music,
two in the visual arts, one in social understanding,
one in logic, two in language. None of the five high-IQ
kids were strong in movement, numbers, or mechanics;
movement and numbers were actually weak spots for
two of these five.