Emotional inteligence
296/661reinforces such thoughts. And yet the managers wereonly further annoyed and provoked by these responses,suggesting the beginning of a cycle that, in the businessworld, ends in the employee quitting or being fired—thebusiness equivalent of a divorce.Indeed, in a study of 108 managers and white-collarworkers, inept criticism was ahead of mistrust, personalitystruggles, and disputes over power and pay as areason for conflict on the job. 6 An experiment done atRensselaer Polytechnic Institute shows just how damagingto working relationships a cutting criticism can be.In a simulation, volunteers were given the task of creatingan ad for a new shampoo. Another volunteer (a confederate)supposedly judged the proposed ads; volunteersactually received one of two prearranged criticisms.One critique was considerate and specific. But theother included threats and blamed the person's innatedeficiencies, with remarks like, "Didn't even try; can'tseem to do anything right" and "Maybe it's just lack oftalent. I'd try to get someone else to do it."Understandably, those who were attacked becametense and angry and antagonistic, saying they would refuseto collaborate or cooperate on future projects withthe person who gave the criticism. Many indicated theywould want to avoid contact altogether—in other words,they felt like stonewalling. The harsh criticism made
those who received it so demoralized that they no longertried as hard at their work and, perhaps most damaging,said they no longer felt capable of doing well. The personalattack was devastating to their morale.Many managers are too willing to criticize, but frugalwith praise, leaving their employees feeling that theyonly hear about how they're doing when they make amistake. This propensity to criticism is compounded bymanagers who delay giving any feedback at all for longperiods. "Most problems in an employee's performanceare not sudden; they develop slowly over time," J. R.Larson, a University of Illinois at Urbana psychologist,notes. "When the boss fails to let his feelings be knownpromptly, it leads to his frustration building up slowly.Then, one day, he blows up about it. If the criticism hadbeen given earlier on, the employee would have beenable to correct the problem. Too often people criticizeonly when things boil over, when they get too angry tocontain themselves. And that's when they give the criticismin the worst way, in a tone of biting sarcasm, callingto mind a long list of grievances they had kept tothemselves, or making threats. Such attacks backfire.They are received as an affront, so the recipient becomesangry in return. It's the worst way to motivatesomeone."The Artful Critique297/661
- Page 246 and 247: Roger asks, before committing himse
- Page 248 and 249: 248/661Seeing him, the drunk roared
- Page 250 and 251: PART THREEEMOTIONALINTELLIGENCE APP
- Page 252 and 253: 252/661staggering 67 percent! 1 If
- Page 254 and 255: 254/661hers. The roots of these emo
- Page 256 and 257: 256/661When girls play together, th
- Page 258 and 259: 258/661couple has "good communicati
- Page 260 and 261: about how to disagree is key to mar
- Page 262 and 263: 262/661An early warning signal that
- Page 264 and 265: 264/661hurtful is the body language
- Page 266 and 267: 266/661The children are being rambu
- Page 268 and 269: 268/661that he is an innocent victi
- Page 270 and 271: laughing with the same attractive m
- Page 272 and 273: 272/661one or another spouse feels
- Page 274 and 275: 274/661Husbands are prone to floodi
- Page 276 and 277: 276/661specific advice for men and
- Page 278 and 279: 278/661watching the game in the den
- Page 280 and 281: though we may have sworn that we wo
- Page 282 and 283: Because flooding is triggered by ne
- Page 284 and 285: 284/661attention to be paid. Then i
- Page 286 and 287: yourself. Another is to take respon
- Page 288 and 289: 10Managing with HeartMelburn McBroo
- Page 290 and 291: 290/661"hard" decisions that busine
- Page 292 and 293: 292/661of work by his team to the c
- Page 294 and 295: in terms of what is expected of the
- Page 298 and 299: 298/661Consider the alternative.An
- Page 300 and 301: 300/661Otherwise it leaves the reci
- Page 302 and 303: 302/661nothing I can do about it."
- Page 304 and 305: budge the biases of those employees
- Page 306 and 307: themselves that he's just unusual,
- Page 308 and 309: 308/661way; respect for the individ
- Page 310 and 311: Still, since prejudices are a varie
- Page 312 and 313: 312/661that the explicit hierarchy
- Page 314 and 315: 314/661But harmony allows a group t
- Page 316 and 317: 316/661with people whose services m
- Page 318 and 319: 318/661self-motivated enough to tak
- Page 320 and 321: 320/661was irrelevant at that momen
- Page 322 and 323: 322/661by a medical model that dism
- Page 324 and 325: 324/661travel in the bloodstream th
- Page 326 and 327: 326/661cells are stored or made—a
- Page 328 and 329: 328/661bleeding is one of the most
- Page 330 and 331: 330/661percent or greater—a range
- Page 332 and 333: 332/661Once heart disease develops,
- Page 334 and 335: 334/661help them soften the attitud
- Page 336 and 337: 336/661that are conjured by the min
- Page 338 and 339: 338/661the most stressful lives, 47
- Page 340 and 341: stress, their ATP levels rose sharp
- Page 342 and 343: 342/661One complication in treating
- Page 344 and 345: 344/661walk again. But depressed wo
those who received it so demoralized that they no longer
tried as hard at their work and, perhaps most damaging,
said they no longer felt capable of doing well. The personal
attack was devastating to their morale.
Many managers are too willing to criticize, but frugal
with praise, leaving their employees feeling that they
only hear about how they're doing when they make a
mistake. This propensity to criticism is compounded by
managers who delay giving any feedback at all for long
periods. "Most problems in an employee's performance
are not sudden; they develop slowly over time," J. R.
Larson, a University of Illinois at Urbana psychologist,
notes. "When the boss fails to let his feelings be known
promptly, it leads to his frustration building up slowly.
Then, one day, he blows up about it. If the criticism had
been given earlier on, the employee would have been
able to correct the problem. Too often people criticize
only when things boil over, when they get too angry to
contain themselves. And that's when they give the criticism
in the worst way, in a tone of biting sarcasm, calling
to mind a long list of grievances they had kept to
themselves, or making threats. Such attacks backfire.
They are received as an affront, so the recipient becomes
angry in return. It's the worst way to motivate
someone."
The Artful Critique
297/661