Emotional inteligence
Because flooding is triggered by negative thoughts aboutthe partner, it helps if a husband or wife who is beingupset by such harsh judgments tackles them head-on.Sentiments like "I'm not going to take this anymore" or"I don't deserve this kind of treatment" are innocent-victimor righteous-indignation slogans. As cognitive therapistAaron Beck points out, by catching these thoughtsand challenging them—rather than simply being enragedor hurt by them—a husband or wife can begin tobecome free of their hold. 28This requires monitoring such thoughts, realizing thatone does not have to believe them, and making the intentionaleffort to bring to mind evidence or perspectivesthat put them in question. For example, a wife whofeels in the heat of the moment that "he doesn't careabout my needs—he's always so selfish" might challengethe thought by reminding herself of a number of thingsher husband has done that are, in fact, thoughtful. Thisallows her to reframe the thought as: "Well, he doesshow he cares about me sometimes, even though whathe just did was thoughtless and upsetting to me." Thelatter formulation opens the possibility of change and apositive resolution; the former only foments anger andhurt.Nondefensive Listening and Speaking282/661
283/661He: "You're shouting!"She: "Of course I'm shouting—you haven't heard aword I'm saying. You just don't listen!"Listening is a skill that keeps couples together. Evenin the heat of an argument, when both are seized byemotional hijackings, one or the other, and sometimesboth, can manage to listen past the anger, and hear andrespond to a partner's reparative gesture. Couplesheaded for divorce, though, get absorbed in the angerand fixated on the specifics of the issue at hand, notmanaging to hear—let alone return—any peace offeringsthat might be implicit in what their partner is saying.Defensiveness in a listener takes the form of ignoring orimmediately rebutting the spouse's complaint, reactingto it as though it were an attack rather than an attemptto change behavior. Of course, in an argument what onespouse says is often in the form of an attack, or is saidwith such strong negativity that it is hard to hear anythingother than an attack.Even in the worst case, it's possible for a couple topurposely edit what they hear, ignoring the hostile andnegative parts of the exchange—the nasty tone, the insult,the contemptuous criticism—to hear the main message.For this feat it helps if partners can remember tosee each other's negativity as an implicit statement ofhow important the issue is to them—a demand for
- Page 232 and 233: 232/661audience of thousands in thi
- Page 234 and 235: 234/661• Organizing groups —the
- Page 236 and 237: 236/661they are having the desired
- Page 238 and 239: more in keeping with their true fee
- Page 240 and 241: 240/661Whether Cecil's deficiency w
- Page 242 and 243: 242/661emotion, and who unwittingly
- Page 244 and 245: 244/661following dialogue from four
- Page 246 and 247: Roger asks, before committing himse
- Page 248 and 249: 248/661Seeing him, the drunk roared
- Page 250 and 251: PART THREEEMOTIONALINTELLIGENCE APP
- Page 252 and 253: 252/661staggering 67 percent! 1 If
- Page 254 and 255: 254/661hers. The roots of these emo
- Page 256 and 257: 256/661When girls play together, th
- Page 258 and 259: 258/661couple has "good communicati
- Page 260 and 261: about how to disagree is key to mar
- Page 262 and 263: 262/661An early warning signal that
- Page 264 and 265: 264/661hurtful is the body language
- Page 266 and 267: 266/661The children are being rambu
- Page 268 and 269: 268/661that he is an innocent victi
- Page 270 and 271: laughing with the same attractive m
- Page 272 and 273: 272/661one or another spouse feels
- Page 274 and 275: 274/661Husbands are prone to floodi
- Page 276 and 277: 276/661specific advice for men and
- Page 278 and 279: 278/661watching the game in the den
- Page 280 and 281: though we may have sworn that we wo
- Page 284 and 285: 284/661attention to be paid. Then i
- Page 286 and 287: yourself. Another is to take respon
- Page 288 and 289: 10Managing with HeartMelburn McBroo
- Page 290 and 291: 290/661"hard" decisions that busine
- Page 292 and 293: 292/661of work by his team to the c
- Page 294 and 295: in terms of what is expected of the
- Page 296 and 297: 296/661reinforces such thoughts. An
- Page 298 and 299: 298/661Consider the alternative.An
- Page 300 and 301: 300/661Otherwise it leaves the reci
- Page 302 and 303: 302/661nothing I can do about it."
- Page 304 and 305: budge the biases of those employees
- Page 306 and 307: themselves that he's just unusual,
- Page 308 and 309: 308/661way; respect for the individ
- Page 310 and 311: Still, since prejudices are a varie
- Page 312 and 313: 312/661that the explicit hierarchy
- Page 314 and 315: 314/661But harmony allows a group t
- Page 316 and 317: 316/661with people whose services m
- Page 318 and 319: 318/661self-motivated enough to tak
- Page 320 and 321: 320/661was irrelevant at that momen
- Page 322 and 323: 322/661by a medical model that dism
- Page 324 and 325: 324/661travel in the bloodstream th
- Page 326 and 327: 326/661cells are stored or made—a
- Page 328 and 329: 328/661bleeding is one of the most
- Page 330 and 331: 330/661percent or greater—a range
283/661
He: "You're shouting!"
She: "Of course I'm shouting—you haven't heard a
word I'm saying. You just don't listen!"
Listening is a skill that keeps couples together. Even
in the heat of an argument, when both are seized by
emotional hijackings, one or the other, and sometimes
both, can manage to listen past the anger, and hear and
respond to a partner's reparative gesture. Couples
headed for divorce, though, get absorbed in the anger
and fixated on the specifics of the issue at hand, not
managing to hear—let alone return—any peace offerings
that might be implicit in what their partner is saying.
Defensiveness in a listener takes the form of ignoring or
immediately rebutting the spouse's complaint, reacting
to it as though it were an attack rather than an attempt
to change behavior. Of course, in an argument what one
spouse says is often in the form of an attack, or is said
with such strong negativity that it is hard to hear anything
other than an attack.
Even in the worst case, it's possible for a couple to
purposely edit what they hear, ignoring the hostile and
negative parts of the exchange—the nasty tone, the insult,
the contemptuous criticism—to hear the main message.
For this feat it helps if partners can remember to
see each other's negativity as an implicit statement of
how important the issue is to them—a demand for