Emotional inteligence
about how to disagree is key to marital survival; menand women have to overcome the innate gender differencesin approaching rocky emotions. Failing this,couples are vulnerable to emotional rifts that eventuallycan tear their relationship apart. As we shall see, theserifts are far more likely to develop if one or both partnershave certain deficits in emotional intelligence.MARITAL FAULT LINES260/661Fred: Did you pick up my dry cleaning?Ingrid: (In a mocking tone) "Did you pick up my drycleaning." Pick up your own damn dry cleaning.What am I, your maid?Fred: Hardly. If you were a maid, at least you'dknow how to clean.If this were dialogue from a sitcom, it might be amusing.But this painfully caustic interchange was between acouple who (perhaps not surprisingly) divorced withinthe next few years. 12 Their encounter took place in alaboratory run by John Gottman, a University of Washingtonpsychologist who has done perhaps the most detailedanalysis ever of the emotional glue that bindscouples together and the corrosive feelings that can destroymarriages. 13 In his laboratory, couples' conversationsare videotaped and then subjected to hours of
261/661microanalysis designed to reveal the subterranean emotionalcurrents at play. This mapping of the fault linesthat may lead a couple to divorce makes a convincingcase for the crucial role of emotional intelligence in thesurvival of a marriage.During the last two decades Gottman has tracked theups and downs of more than two hundred couples, somejust newlyweds, others married for decades. Gottmanhas charted the emotional ecology of marriage with suchprecision that, in one study, he was able to predict whichcouples seen in his lab (like Fred and Ingrid, whose discussionof getting the dry cleaning was so acrimonious)would divorce within three years with 94 percent accuracy,a precision unheard of in marital studies!The power of Gottman's analysis comes from hispainstaking method and the thoroughness of his probes.While the couples talk, sensors record the slightest fluxin their physiology; a second-by-second analysis of theirfacial expressions (using the system for reading emotionsdeveloped by Paul Ekman) detects the most fleetingand subtle nuance of feeling. After their session,each partner comes separately to the lab and watches avideotape of the conversation, and narrates his or hersecret thoughts during the heated moments of the exchange.The result is akin to an emotional X-ray of themarriage.
- Page 210 and 211: 210/661of an entire group, such as
- Page 212 and 213: 212/661cycle that precipitates thei
- Page 214 and 215: 214/661While there may be some smal
- Page 216 and 217: 216/661been torturers for terrorist
- Page 218 and 219: 218/661results as meaning that psyc
- Page 220 and 221: 8The Social ArtsAs so often happens
- Page 222 and 223: 222/661able to draw on a large repe
- Page 224 and 225: 224/661One key social competence is
- Page 226 and 227: propriety; they dictate how our own
- Page 228 and 229: 228/661emotional skills make us fee
- Page 230 and 231: 230/661mimic the facial expression
- Page 232 and 233: 232/661audience of thousands in thi
- Page 234 and 235: 234/661• Organizing groups —the
- Page 236 and 237: 236/661they are having the desired
- Page 238 and 239: more in keeping with their true fee
- Page 240 and 241: 240/661Whether Cecil's deficiency w
- Page 242 and 243: 242/661emotion, and who unwittingly
- Page 244 and 245: 244/661following dialogue from four
- Page 246 and 247: Roger asks, before committing himse
- Page 248 and 249: 248/661Seeing him, the drunk roared
- Page 250 and 251: PART THREEEMOTIONALINTELLIGENCE APP
- Page 252 and 253: 252/661staggering 67 percent! 1 If
- Page 254 and 255: 254/661hers. The roots of these emo
- Page 256 and 257: 256/661When girls play together, th
- Page 258 and 259: 258/661couple has "good communicati
- Page 262 and 263: 262/661An early warning signal that
- Page 264 and 265: 264/661hurtful is the body language
- Page 266 and 267: 266/661The children are being rambu
- Page 268 and 269: 268/661that he is an innocent victi
- Page 270 and 271: laughing with the same attractive m
- Page 272 and 273: 272/661one or another spouse feels
- Page 274 and 275: 274/661Husbands are prone to floodi
- Page 276 and 277: 276/661specific advice for men and
- Page 278 and 279: 278/661watching the game in the den
- Page 280 and 281: though we may have sworn that we wo
- Page 282 and 283: Because flooding is triggered by ne
- Page 284 and 285: 284/661attention to be paid. Then i
- Page 286 and 287: yourself. Another is to take respon
- Page 288 and 289: 10Managing with HeartMelburn McBroo
- Page 290 and 291: 290/661"hard" decisions that busine
- Page 292 and 293: 292/661of work by his team to the c
- Page 294 and 295: in terms of what is expected of the
- Page 296 and 297: 296/661reinforces such thoughts. An
- Page 298 and 299: 298/661Consider the alternative.An
- Page 300 and 301: 300/661Otherwise it leaves the reci
- Page 302 and 303: 302/661nothing I can do about it."
- Page 304 and 305: budge the biases of those employees
- Page 306 and 307: themselves that he's just unusual,
- Page 308 and 309: 308/661way; respect for the individ
261/661
microanalysis designed to reveal the subterranean emotional
currents at play. This mapping of the fault lines
that may lead a couple to divorce makes a convincing
case for the crucial role of emotional intelligence in the
survival of a marriage.
During the last two decades Gottman has tracked the
ups and downs of more than two hundred couples, some
just newlyweds, others married for decades. Gottman
has charted the emotional ecology of marriage with such
precision that, in one study, he was able to predict which
couples seen in his lab (like Fred and Ingrid, whose discussion
of getting the dry cleaning was so acrimonious)
would divorce within three years with 94 percent accuracy,
a precision unheard of in marital studies!
The power of Gottman's analysis comes from his
painstaking method and the thoroughness of his probes.
While the couples talk, sensors record the slightest flux
in their physiology; a second-by-second analysis of their
facial expressions (using the system for reading emotions
developed by Paul Ekman) detects the most fleeting
and subtle nuance of feeling. After their session,
each partner comes separately to the lab and watches a
videotape of the conversation, and narrates his or her
secret thoughts during the heated moments of the exchange.
The result is akin to an emotional X-ray of the
marriage.